President of the Republic, the Minister of Justice, corruption and justice

Paris, Wednesday, December 5, 2012

François HOLLAND
President


The care of
Mr. BESNARD
Chief of Staff




Mr. President

I have the honor to submit, for your information, the attached text.

I beg you to accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration,


Marc Salomone



 Paris, Wednesday, December 4, 2012


Christiane TAUBIRAAttorney,Minister of Justice
Chief of StaffMr. Christian Vigouroux
Business technical adviser reservedEric Lafontaine
13, place Vendôme75042 PARIS CEDEX 01Tel. : 01 44 77 60 60Fax: 01.44.77.60.81

Madam Attorney General,
I have the honor to send you the enclosed text.
For the purposes of his defense, in the office of judge Gentil, Sarkozy has shown that in practice the government, the "separation of powers" is an illusion.
- "I can tell you that neither Philip nor Courroye myself have acted to delay, modify or complicate the Bettencourt affair,,, I want proof that your name has intervened in Intitiative Philippe Courroye on the instruction of the Attorney General of Versailles. And who would have thought that the PG of Versailles would have this instruction if the Minister of Justice did not agree? And who can imagine that the Minister of Justice gives its approval if the President does not agree?;;, This is proof that I do not interfere ... ".The Chained Duck, the mercrdit November 28, 2012, P. 8With these words, uttered under his experience as Head of State, Mr Sarkozy shattered the manipulation of the doctrine of the independence of the judiciary, by departmental representatives, to deliver the common people dark desires only to judges.
Minister, as a representative of the Executive by universal suffrage making can and should tell the judges that breaches of loyalty are mistakes.
Judges ranked after all applications without opening preliminary investigations before them for two reasons:a-They think that the executive power, the only worthwhile in their eyes, is not that Mr. Sarkozy and Mr. Bartolone are the subjects of a public judicial Interogation.b-They do not imagine for a moment an inquiry about a person they consider the "state nobility" at the request of another person they see as a beggar. This was publicly theorized by Judge Salas researcher.c-business frameworks for the Ile de France are classified offices for failing to show that covers both those cited above.
It goes without saying that to spend the taxpayers' expense, a smig per day, four days per person in London, under a pretext professional untrue, for his sake, as well as the fact of using a car or forbidden to engage in witness tampering, are criminal offenses.
It goes without saying that the fact that elected maintains relationships with reciprocal services wheeler proved creates conflicts of interest and opens on mafia-type reports, which justice to worry. As it does elsewhere, for the same information to Mr. Cope.
It goes without saying that the fact that a head of state to be sucking on order, with the vocabulary identified by the psychiatrist as the type of vocabulary rapists also rape. In this case, the rape of a member, and the rape of the Constitution.
I ask you specifically, Madam Minister, to ask the prosecutor and the Attorney-General to review the texes loyally offered to them, as Mr. Sarkozy told a judge us as you power.
Permissiveness judges elected to the porosity of the requests of businessmen is a direct cause of the Mafia stranglehold on Corsica, the accumulation of violent deaths is a visible and bloody.
The Judge Salas researcher raise the specter of moral order as soon as he comes to question the justice of criminal activity executive. My answer is that the position of senior executives of the state is unusual.
Nobody asks them to be exemplary. But when they commit crimes are made public policy and organize networks of frames that go with citizenship legal action is fully justified.
If we look at the acts under judges we see that they are intentionally public. One of their major reasons being, besides the pleasure they provide is to be public to organize political life.
On the other hand, in the case of the Ile de France at least, is the fact that their knowledge of employees, executives here, which combine with the press to challenge the government.
Not communicate these facts to the court is siding with corrupt employees and elected against employees and elected officials honest.
It is said that the annual report of Transparency International. Citizen Action is déterminente in reducing corruption, a major scourge of our time.
Covering the crime of executives because of feudal ideology of another time, prevents judges to modernize France. We are back.
Can you remain neutral in this debate, Madam Attorney?
Please accept, Madam, the assurances of my highest consideration,

Marc Salomone