blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The
Two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris, Saturday, July 20th, 2019
CONTRIBUTION (30) TO THE NATIONAL
DEBATE WISHED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC IN 2019.
(Continuation of the reflection of
September 11, 2018. see: madic50.blogspot.com)
THE CONTINUATION OF THE EXCLUSION
DEVICES OF CHILDREN IN THE STATE OF THE RECOGNIZED DRIVING LICENSE
ESSENTIAL BY THE GOVERNMENT. THE DISCRIMINATION OF THESE CHILDREN FOR
THE GROUPS OF CHILDREN DEFINED AS USEFUL BY THE TRIPTYQUE OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY FORMALIZED BY TERRA NOVA (CAPITALISTS,
UNIVERSITY, IMMIGRANTS).
For the Government, Parliament,
Justice.
FLAGRANT DISCRIMINATION
On Friday, July 19, 2019, Mr. Castaner,
Minister of the Interior, details the reform of the driving license
that he qualifies as "essential everyday object".
He says the government's goal is "to
have a license that can be passed sooner, faster and cheaper".
Such a decision is both political and
budgetary. It costs.
It raises the question of the
principles of equality and universality.
When the Minister cites a target of his
action, he names the Students.
Indeed, the only ones who will be able
to turn this Permit at 1700 euros to 1700 euros are the children of
executives and employees well settled or benefiting from parallel
community aid; like those of Qatar put in place by the Minister of
Economy Montebourg.
This is the second time that the
government, this one and the previous ones, put in place a system of
targeted aid that is not illegal but discriminating.
Already, the children of Harkis
benefit:
"Decree No. 2018-1320 of 28
December 2018 (A) establishes a support system for the children of
former members of the auxiliary and assimilated forces who served the
French army during the war in Algeria.
From 1 January 2019 to 31 December
2022, a solidarity aid scheme is hereby established to provide
financial assistance to children of harkis, moghaznis and staff of
the various auxiliary civilian status local law and assimilated
having served in Algeria. "
The legality of these solidarity
schemes is based on the exceptional nature of a situation for the
Harkis or support for an activity that is particularly important for
society such as higher education.
In this sequencing, we recognize the
shadow of the doctrine of administrative policy formalized by Terra
Nova, according to which the useful citizens are composed of
capitalists, academics, immigrants.
However, the accumulation of these
solidarity mechanisms would become manifestly discriminatory, and
would be tainted by illegality, if it were established that they
arbitrarily exclude a part of the obviously vulnerable population
from specific targeted assistance for an indispensable activity and
recognized as "essential" by the government: that of
driving a car.
These populations are those of
children, even adults, with whom the state is specifically committed
to bear the costs of their access to active life today.
De facto and de jure, these children
are legally children of the state.
However, it is now common knowledge
that he does not fulfill any of his training obligations (neither
academic nor professional) with regard to his children.
However, it is a fact that the state is
committed to the children of the ESA and to the Nation, to assume the
burden of families until their 18 years and to help them settle down
to their 25 years.
By recognizing the Permit as an
"essential everyday object", the Minister of the Interior
includes this Permit in the family expenses that come to him.
It also allows in the future the
passage of this License before 18 years; in the home or foster home.
Ensuring his own children the payment
of the Driver's License and thus increasing their employability
tenfold is first and foremost a restitution on the part of the State.
Of course, state children will never
break stores or bombs.
They have none the less the right to
consider the public authorities and to examine the commitments still
not kept to date.
Marc SALOMONE
PS: letter of September 11
Paris, Tuesday, September 11, 2018
In copy: Presidents of Parliament /
Chairmen of Parliamentary Groups
Mr. President of the Republic,
You are concerned about poverty.
Would it not be possible for the state
to involve its own children in measures to prevent poverty from
recurring indefinitely?
State children are those with whom the
state has engaged in the responsibilities of parents.
They are called "Pupils of the
Nation" or "Children of the ESA"; formerly Children of
Public Assistance and then Dass.
Often, they were abducted from their
parents in the cradle, at the state nursery.
They come out weakened or even
annihilated.
Social discrimination and hatred of the
poor are the norm. State officials do not even look for the least
interim solution. Children are seized simply because one of the
parents is at Cotorep and the other parent is generally poorly
educated.
The poverty trap is working at full
capacity. The parents leave the Dass, the children return from birth,
the grandchildren are sure to be seized by the ASE.
Great-grandparents were already there.
The result is almost constant. They are
expelled at 18, without training, without a diploma, without a
driving license, without a job, without a home, or the ability to
have one.
What can the state, with the support of
Parliament, do for the children of Harkis, do it for its own
children, whose birth he took responsibility?
To this end, I ask to be received by
the competent person whom you will designate to speak of concrete
cases likely to provide a jurisprudence.
Thanking you for your attention and
waiting to read you,
Please accept, Mr President of the
Republic, the assurances of my highest regards,
Marc SALOMONE
