blog:
madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The Two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris, Sunday, March 24,
2019
CONTRIBUTION (14) TO THE
NATIONAL DEBATE WISHED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC IN 2019.
REFLECTION ON THE MERIC PROCESS AND ITS REPLACEMENT DUE TO THE
REASONS INDISCUTABLE ON THE REALITY OF THE ANTIFAS (Continuation of
the contribution n ° 13 of Monday, March 11, 2019, cf .: Madic50)
1) - The facts
1- 2013
Since June 5, 2013, two
men, Samuel Dufour and Esteban Morillo, are swept into the legal
turmoil. The Paris Assize Court of 14 September 2018 sentenced them
to 11 years for one, 7 years for the other. The Appeal allowed the
provisional release of Morillo.
Their crime?
One of them, Morillo, was
wanted by the "Antifas" who had pinned his portrait on a
dedicated painting of their local with the mention: Wanted.
The Antifas have searched
for him, found him, provoked him. No one worried about their
responsibilities in the death of one of them.
On the one hand, this
display action alone should have given them a judicial challenge for
usurpation of quality and power, whatever the legal statement.
Indeed, only the police can "search" a person considered by
his trackers as "criminal".
On the other hand, from
the moment when there was a death this search and this meeting can no
longer be considered as a game of schoolboy.
Justice treats the case
as a criminal case and not an accident. The least thing would have
been to know by what chance the Antifas found a man, Morillo, they
were looking for, in the manner of the national police.
Instead, on the one hand
the Antifas are released from custody, where they are interrogated as
victims and witnesses, on the other hand, one of them, probably their
leader. , is heard at trial as a Civil Party.
2- In 2018
In 2018-2019, the Antifas
remember the good memory of the public. Their name is mentioned among
the so-called "professional breakers" Champs-Elysees during
demonstrations of yellow vests.
On the subject of the
action of these demonstrators, the Executive Power uses the
qualification of rioters and enemies of the Republic to overthrow it.
Whatever the protections
from which it seems they benefit, the Antifas can not be the
embodiment of Good on September 14, 2018 and the incarnation of Evil
on December 8, 2018.
This hiatus leads to a
return on the course of the Meric trial and a reflection on its
conclusions.
It is to this reflection
that this text is devoted.
2) - The trial of
September 14, 2018
1- Class justice
The construction of the
trial of 14 September 2018 was first the lynching of two workers by
the university caste. A human sacrifice to purify oneself of the
years when academics had to treat the workers as "comrades"
and their representatives as Ministers.
There, they can finally
restore the text of the discourse of domination.
On this occasion, the
dominated become again "dangerous classes", criminals born,
as always, and the agents of the dominants become reeds of the
civilization.
Finally ! We feel better
when we are Master of the in-between!
2- Integration
This process has a second
effect: its unfolding, from June 2013 to September 2018, has produced
a form of institutional integration of Antifas and the recognition of
an implicit public service delegation to them.
It extends to all groups
or militias organized under the name of Antifascism code. The latter
is erected as an ideological state administration.
Today, police fear the
judicial consequences of their actions in the repression of Antifas
and other subversive common rights.
a- the case Meric
Prior to June 2013, the
certainty of impunity for the display of a person's photo as
"research", the meeting of "researchers" and
"wanted" to provoke it, indicate the assurance of these
groups vis-à-vis the legality.
This inclusion of the
Antifas in the apparatus of formation of the legality is confirmed,
as from June 5, 2013, by the support of the Public authorities and
the services of investigation to the speech of the Antifas on the
bloody facts, as well as in September 2018, in court, by hearing an
Antifa as Civil Party.
The heavy use of
Morillo's tattoos as evidence of guilt at the trial consolidates the
Antifas in the merits of their approach.
b- The riots
In December 2018, on the
Champs-Élysées, the control of the public space by these groups and
their relations with the forces of order also comes from this
recognition.
a- The offensive of the
rioters, of December 8, 2018 and of March 16, 2019, is the
implementation of this legalization of their action.
b- In the same way that
they can, in 2013, "search" a person, summon her to a
fight, they can, in 2018 and in 2019, organize the occupation of the
public space and impose their order by terror.
c- The legal status
By this process, they
have judicially acquired the legal quality to fight what they call
"fachos" on behalf of what they call "antifascism".
For them, there is no
difference between killing a horrible skinhead or ransacking the
insulting Fouquet's; correct the insolent "facho" or lynch
the villainous policeman.
Rioters claim less to
take power than to multiply it. They only provoke the forces of order
to challenge their universal authority, the indivisibility of the
state.
They want to fight, lower
the cackling of the "facho" or push back the policemen, not
to defeat them and build something else, but so that both understand
that force must remain in the law and that they are representatives
in certain places and under certain circumstances.
This was conceded to them
by the Meric affair.
3- The association of
fact
The trial established a
community of thought, of definition, of purpose, between the
representatives of the Public authorities and the militants of these
groups that the justice receives like witnesses and civil party,
therefore like collaborators, and with which the State is engaged in
agreeing to take sides, to include, in the opposition of two camps
defined by these groups.
In this trial, the state
has in fact joined the militants of these groups in the definition of
a public enemy on ideological bases that are degraded forms of
religious logic and subversive policies.
3) - A right go and a
static wait
It is said at the trial
that in this brawl, the skinhead go "right" on the scene
where the Antifas wait while waiting for them.
a- They wait, that is,
they are waiting for the skinheads who are not there.
b- They could go home.
c- It is not disputed
that the Antifas waited for the skinhead exclusively to fight.
Clearly, if some "right"
on the obstacle, the others create the obstacle by waiting on these
places to fight.
If some did not come to
these places, the others did not have to be present or to stick to
it.
But justice will make the
coming of some a presumption of guilt and the previous presence of
others a mark of innocence.
This is so because the
Antifas are virtually assimilated to guardians of public order.
As "antifascists"
and even better "young antifascists", they are the last
defense against the foul beast embodied by the "fachos".
Skinheads "right"
on the Antifas as Hitler goes "right" on Poland. The
Antifas are the victims of this repetition of barbarism.
In this case, the state
does not define its role as the opposition to disorder and
subversion. He puts himself in a position to support the associative
instruments of these two policies.
4) - The crime of
wickedness
1- The Godwin point
This association of the
state and these scoundrels is based at trial on the recourse to what
an American sociologist has called "The Godwin Law".
"The longer an
online discussion lasts, the more the likelihood of finding a
comparison involving the Nazis or Adolf Hitler approaches 1".
In the confrontation,
there is no question of the Jewishness of Meric.
On the other hand, the
trial will stage the parents of Meric to justify the absorption of
the debate by the ideological references attributed to the extreme
right, linking them to anti-Semitism, Auschwitz, thence to a threat
of apocalypse of which the confrontation of June 5th would be
Armageddon.
This falsely historical
and truly religious incision makes it possible to do what one wants
facts and, beyond, defendants.
2- The face-to-face
However, if the raid
Vel'd'hiv establishes the cosmic guilt of the accused, it does not
found a personal report of the accused vis-à-vis Meric.
This is why the Attorney
General completes the apocalyptic, or anti-Nazi, device by a device
that is both medical for Meric and psychological for the accused.
Meric was recovering from
leukemia. He was particularly weak and vulnerable. As such, he
represented "no danger" for the accused.
Unbeknownst to its
author, this evocation of the weakness of Meric induces the
possibility that his death comes from his only fragility of
constitution.
To evacuate this path
that innocent Morillo, the Attorney General accuses Morillo of a
charge of cowardice. He would have attacked a weak and helpless
person.
5) - The use of weakness
This argument of weakness
has two parts:
1- The personal report
Morillo could not know
this weakness for two reasons:
factual reason
Morillo could not know
that Meric represented "no danger" for him. It is not
written on his forehead that he is suffering from leukemia.
He observed the
individual and calculated that he did not represent "danger".
That's why he set out to
fight with another.
It was because Meric
attacked him in the back that he turned to end his blows.
So, Morillo did not hit
Meric because he was dangerous or not. He responded to an attack by
Meric. He did it by the reflex of a person who turns around and hits
because the aggressor is patting him on the back.
b- legal reason
Morillo is in the
legality. That is, he does not "look for" Meric. He does
not know his face, his name, his quality. He did not investigate.
Everyone understands that
this is exactly the opposite of the position of the Antifas and
consequently that of Meric.
Antifas are in the
illegal. They are there because they are looking for Morillo. Even if
it turned out that they did not come expressly for him, they
recognized him and arrested him because they investigated him. They
cling to their provocation and wait until they can hit it, because
they chase it as prey.
Unless he equates Morillo
with an officer of the Army of Occupation, he is in no power to
postpone a political fight on a private person who does his shopping.
The deputies want the
respect of their private life by their political opponents. The
workers too. Their quality, called right, does not allow academics,
said left, to challenge them out of the political field.
2- The functional report
It was not Morillo who
used a weakness he could not otherwise know. On the other hand, it is
the fact, voluntary, conscious, organized, Antifas.
Meric is indeed dead of
the staging of his congenital weaknesses but he owes it expressly to
the hierarchy of Antifas.
The media tells us that
it is indisputable that the weakness of Meric was regularly exploited
by the Antifas; in this confrontation and in all others.
It was they who summoned
Meric for a confrontation in which, as the Attorney General said in
essence, he was not a match.
But this is precisely
what the hierarchy of Antifas expected; that he does not make weight.
Thus, they could again fight in the name of the Good.
We know that on the one
hand, it was used in the demonstrations by the Directorate of Antifas
because of its weakness. He was charged with insulting and provoking
the other side. When this one reacted, the Antifas could attack it in
the name of the defense of the martyr. Videos and photos show that
there is at least one question about it.
On the other hand, the
day of provocation:
a- the watchman of the
store testified that Meric's intervention in the store was not
spontaneous but constantly relaunched by his supervisor.
b- a video shows that he
attacked the accused from behind.
The Antifas were not
alone in watching for the opportunity to defend the Good.
The succession of events
related to transportation at the Meric hospital should be studied.
This attack was obviously
backed by a political operation of magnitude from a state offensive
against the far right. Only the unforeseen death of Meric, due to a
constitution weakness that no one could have foreseen, the same day,
disorganized this action and put it in the boxes.
6) - The functioning of
Antifas
It is easy for the state
to play in 2018 the frightened virgins. But the Méric affair of June
2013 already made it possible to predict the "professional"
Casses of December 2018.
We see all the logics of
existence of these extremist groups:
1- Tactics
The Antifas provoke,
retreat, organize a trap, then, before the consequences of their
actions, accuse and martyrise. One of them parade at trial as Civil
Party.
We find the same logic
from the provocateurs who accompany the movement of yellow vests.
a- The martyrdom of Meric
is represented here by the cut hands, the grenades collected on the
ground in order to be revived, the eyes bored by the shots of the
policemen.
b- Injured police
officers are deemed to have looked for him.
2- Anti-fascist quality
Justice has admitted that
Clement Meric is an "anti-fascist" because he is registered
in an "Antifa" movement and it is written on it as for the
Port-Salve.
Today, the same factious
people use this official stamp recognized by the judiciary, in other
words the state, to carry out anti-capitalist destructions against
businesses, anti-repressive assaults against the police, anti-Semitic
attacks to defend against attacks coming from Jews; if not in France
at least in Palestine.
Islamists stuck S are
naturally present in 2018 since they were there in 2013. It is so
because the fight to break the indivisibility of the Republic is
common to them.
3- The brawl
It was also said that it
was "a fight between left-wing activists and extreme right-wing
skinheads, after a chance encounter in a private sale of clothing."
In the same way, the
Antifas, and their Black block associates of the Champs-Élysées,
are in a "fight" with the police and the tradesmen. This
means that they are equally responsible for violence, face-to-face.
As such, they rebel when
the police arrest them while they walk peacefully on the sidewalk and
go on a sightseeing tour at the Arc-de-Triomphe. It's their word
against the police.
a- Except that on June 5,
2013, there was no "brawl". Antifas do not cause a
skinhead. They assault the customer of a store doing his shopping
peacefully.
b- It is the same, by the
same, on the Champs-Élysées in 2018-2019.
All this device of
action, fallback, martyr, offensive, was validated by the State on
the occasion of the trial of the Meric case.
7) - Return to the trial
The trial of September
14, 2018, held in the evidence of the innocence of people whose
government is led to say, December 8, they want to overthrow the
Republic.
It is no longer possible
to fly over the chronological facts, to deny the evidences of a trap,
and perhaps even to be premeditated, to invoke the manna of the
deportees in order to solve the problem, to charge only by ideology
people who did not look for anyone and who really did their shopping,
to exempt from their accounts persons who "sought" their
prey, to conceal their part in the coming of the mortal fact, etc.
1- One of the parties,
Morillo and Dufour, knew how to draw the consequences of the 2013
gear.
a- The death of Meric
intervenes on June 5th, 2013:
b- As of September 2013,
Morillo and Dufour challenge the lawyer of their political movement
and take lawyers out of it.
From the outset, they
have always refused to identify this event with any political action.
2- On the other hand, the
other party was incited by the political leaders of all sides and by
the members of the government of the time, by the media, to claim
loudly and loudly its victory against the "fachos".
Even if it is permissible
to think that the death of Meric has spoiled the party, cut the
impulses and broke the relations.
The trial of September
14, 2018 is in line with this artificial storm of 2013 or state
cadres play their part with thugs under the pretext that they cause
revolutionary and join the revolt of the oppressed.
The results are seen
every week on the Champs-Élysées.
8) - Balance sheet
This trial was neither
serene, educated nor objective.
The reality is that Meric
died accidentally because of a delicate constitution that he asked
too much for the exhibition of ideas that no one can deny they were
and are always deleterious.
Hitler and the Illuminati
have nothing to do with it.
No one can ignore that
the Antifas are factious thugs or that their responsibilities in the
facts of June 5, 2013 have never been educated.
They certainly continue
to be useful in murky waters.
But their place can no
longer be that of associates of the public authorities.
Or you must have the
honesty to issue them official maps so that the police, as in other
times, know what to do.
The arguments underlying
the trial are no longer admissible.
The trial is based on the
legalization of the ideological public service delegation (a right to
"search" people, provoking the fight in a civilian place)
granted to the Antifas, by the government, in the Meric case.
It can not be anymore.
A young man got up in the
morning to go shopping. He slept in prison at night with a murder
charge and two comrades who came to rescue him.
The only reason for this
calvary is to have crossed a band of factious charlatans whose
approach is illegal in every way.
Méric voluntarily
offered to the Antifas so that their hierarchy exploited his weakness
of constitution.
It was agreed that he
always dodged his encounter with the force he was provoking. The big
guys in the group did it.
An inevitable dysfunction
of this device, as imbecile as villainous, placed Meric in the face
of the fist he had provoked, as usual. He died of it.
In view of the literature
published in the media, I retain as a credible hypothesis that his
stay in the hospital and the trumpets of fame that accompanied him
could be expected. His death alone shifted the profitability of
street action to the courts.
The rest we know now. The
riots of the Champs-Elysees are a moment of the unification of these
factious. The worse is yet to come.
9) - Conclusion
Pride can, of course,
triumph. The reason too.
The question arises as to
which Antifas and Magistrates dominate the action of the other.
For reasons of justice as
well as public order, the court must rule on the facts, their real
environment, their history.
The Court of Appeal is
fully empowered to prosecute this accident and the mistakes that led
to it.
The adventure must give
way to the right.
MARC SALOMONE
