Paris, Friday, August 11, 2017
Copy :
1- President of the French Republic
2- European Commission
3- UN
4- Embassies:England, Germany, USA, Russia, China, Vietnam, Japan, North Korea, South Korea,
5- Presidents of Parliament and French Parliamentary Groups
Reflection on the dispute between two governments concerning Korea.
We must go back to 1939, and then to 1914, to find a precedent for the
level of infantilism and intellectual cowardice that today governs the
treatment of the two Koreas affair.
Humanity takes the risk of a war rendered uncontrollable by the mere fact of the imbecility which presides over it.
The only proposals formulated by the governments concerned are for one
to treat the other as morons who understand only the effects of atomic
bombs and for the other to promise nuclear fire to his alter ego.
The only intervention of other governments is to be prepared to say that whatever happens they have nothing to do with it.
The end of the experts' wise analysis is to repeat in heart that they do not believe in the possibility of a war.
In France we are accustomed to this lucidity. They said the same thing on 31 July 1914 and 2 September 1939. Then they announced the short and surgical thing.
Faced with this bankruptcy of rulers and academics, as well as the
crime of Libya, ordinary citizens have the right and the duty to say
their word.
What
journalists call a Cockfight between the President of North Korea and
the President of the United States is actually a debate on the
intangibility of the boundary of the 38th parallel established at the
Yalta Conference on 11 February 1945 And constitutive of these two political regimes.
Before being different social-economic regimes, the two Koreas are
first of all zones of exclusion from the military power of the camp
defined as other and the monopoly of the power of the camp defined as
its own.
It is not the people who define these two political entities. These were the military-political apparatuses that were produced by the rifts of the Second World War.
They have no other function than to reproduce this division eternally.
If the conflict resumes such an antagonistic turn, it is because the
propaganda on the unification of the two Koreas works in denial of this
reality.
The first Korean war was already provoked by the myth of possible
reunification for the benefit of one or other of the hegemonic
doctrines.
Mechanically, the only aim of these policies of reunification,
whatever the ideological dressing, is the military subjection of one
part by the other.
The only way out of the institutionalization of this primordial
exclusion and to leave a chance to immediate peace and far-reaching
reunification is to take note of it and formally renounce the falsehoods
of a factitious unification.
It is impossible to have Chinese or Russian troops in Seoul as well as American troops in Pyongyang.
The powder magazine of Korea can only be pacified at the following two conditions:
1-
The United States undertakes, by means of a treaty with the states
concerned, never to cross the 38th parallel, to invade North Korea, to
install troops there, to include it in a military network that is
favorable to them, or by intermediaries.
2.
The Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China undertake,
through a treaty with the States concerned, never to cross the 38th
parallel, invade South Korea, install troops there, include it in a
military network Either favorably, directly or through intermediaries.
This double guarantee of respect for political realities will lead to
the disqualification of adventurous policies and the legitimation of the
obligation of appeasement and dialogue on the part of the two Koreas.
The parties can meet in Paris where a place has already presided over
this function of agreement between these two militarily divergent
interest groups.
From then on, the UN can act.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire