Marc Salomone / blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The Two Forms (Amazon)
Paris, Wednesday April 13, 2022
Eric MATHAIS
district Attorney,
Address :
Judicial Court of Bobigny
173 AVENUE PAUL VAILLANT COUTURIER
93008 Bobigny
Email: tj1-bobigny@justice.fr
Phone: 0148951393
Fax: 0148951585
Mr. Public Prosecutor,
1)- The shock
Your television statement of April 5, 2022 concerning the Jérémy Cohen affair is chilling.
I am particularly sensitive to this because I work alongside people with mental disabilities. Every Saturday, I take in an autistic person whom I then bring back to his home.
This Sunday, I myself had to intervene with children aged 7 and 8 led by leaders of 9 and 10 who were methodically and noisily preparing to attack an autistic person, and were training to this end to foment a crisis. of collective hysteria, under the benevolent eye of the adults who took care not to see anything.
I feel your statements as an alliance with these thugs of all ages but not of all origins and faiths.
These origins and confessions you name them yourselves in a publicly coded way by immediately affirming that there is no anti-Semitism. Everyone now knows these codes: "No anti-Semitism", "no connection with terrorism", etc., that means community thugs.
Your television statement draws a judicial line in this case and thus builds case law.
This names the mentally handicapped as publicly invisible and judicially neutral targets.
Their attackers are assured of never being sought as such if they attack a mentally handicapped person without adding "grounds of discrimination" reserved for real human beings.
There remains then the aggression, this night when all the cows are gray. It's worth a call to the law.
Why not? Why not be prepared to pose as a victim; as so often happens?
2)- The logic of the intervention
On the one hand, you concede a penal prohibition of anti-Semitism made to thugs to tacitly legitimize another source of criminality which is the aggression of the mentally handicapped.
On the other hand, you declare that the criminality conceded is not present and your silence indicates that the criminality ignored is not wanted.
The death of this man thus falls into judicial nothingness.
3)- The two sources
From the outset, you favor one source over any other.
You say: "Of course, any element allowing to establish a discriminatory reason for this scene of violence, in particular anti-Semitic, will give rise to an aggravation of the criminal qualification retained".
1- Anti-Semitism
Immediately, you close the way to this discrimination.
"To date, there is no evidence to establish with certainty whether or not the victim was wearing a yarmulke or not at the time of the scene of violence."
This affirmation of the evidence of an absence of anti-Semitism is, moreover, contradicted by the facts.
This is how the public learns that a Kippah was found near the victim's body and returned to the family by the police.
It is necessary for that that she was out of her clothes, therefore out, therefore visible for those who scrutinized this man.
It seems difficult to declare on television that anti-Semitism is excluded from the hypotheses.
At the very least, you must answer this question and explain that vis-à-vis people who scrutinize you, a Kippah held in your hand, if only out of fear, is invisible and imperceptible.
2- Mental disability
There is another source of discrimination which is obviously present and completely ignored.
It's mental disability.
It is impossible that these people did not realize that this man did not react like a valid person, neither in gesture, nor in word, nor in mentality.
4)- The consequences
On March 29, the prosecution opened a judicial investigation against "unnamed person" for "violence committed in a meeting resulting in death without intention to give it".
Taking this criminality into account would have consequences on the very qualification of criminal misconduct.
Indeed, if the mental disability, established, were taken into account, the death of this man would no longer be simply accidental and the absence of intentionality would be questionable.
There would no longer be an obvious separation between aggression and percussion by the tram.
The video shows that there is no explanation for this collision on such open ground.
Unless we take into account that this handicapped man has lost his faculties of location in space and time because of this aggression.
The aggressors, presumed, innocent or martyrs, then become co-authors of the death of this man.
They are the ones who voluntarily provoked, in meetings, in consultation, consciously, the psychic imbalance which produces this blindness.
5)- Qualifications
You say: "In particular, the strength of the causal link between the scene of violence and the death of the victim should be established. »
You refer to a video that the public saw which showed that "several individuals were beating the victim, the violent scenes ceased and the attackers dispersed. The victim then began to cross the roadway and then the tram tracks before being struck."
a- Antisemitic criminality does not necessarily establish a causal link between aggression and shock.
b- On the other hand, crime against the disabled establishes a mechanical, psychic continuity between the aggression, the loss of bearings, the shock.
Nothing else can explain that on such an open site, this man did not see the tram.
6)- the culprits.
It is necessary to distinguish the blows and the complete action
a- Those who have dealt blows are personally responsible for these blows.
b- However, it is all of those who attacked this disabled person who, each in their own way, caused this loss of reference and who are individually responsible for this loss of reference, this imbalance,
this deprivation of the senses, and therefore of the fact that this shock took place.
7)- Digression
It would seem preposterous to post here the usual speech of this type of delinquent:
a- we forced him to walk on a bar hanging in the air.
b- but we are not for nothing if he fell into the void.
c- I didn't do anything, I just blocked him so he wouldn't save, I held him for a moment so he wouldn't lose his balance.
d- afterwards, it's up to him to see. He didn't have to fall.
All present will have contributed to the formation of a criminal situation.
8)- Consciousness
Did these thugs realize they were putting Mr. Cohen in danger.
The answer is yes.
They wanted to imprint their omnipotence on his person.
Besides, people burst out laughing at the incident.
It's just a circus act.
9)- Justice
Does justice have to take into account the representation that criminals have of their crime?
Yes for the personality analysis.
Not for qualification.
Most criminals of this type leave the victim responsible for his or her downfall or death.
Beating husbands laugh at the physical decay or suicide of the battered wife. Or on the contrary take the public to witness their own pain. Ditto for rapists, harassers, discriminators.
The SS feed the prisoners. It is the latter who are incapable of holding on. Etc.
This bunch of amused scoundrels simply wanted to squeeze the lemon. They let go of the peel.
Justice must remind them that their pressing is the first phase of the crime and that it is totally in solidarity with it.
10)- The public
It is remarkable that no association presented itself to the debate on disability.
We do not disturb the able-bodied for anything and especially for anyone.
The family don't care too much because they fought for the disabled son to be "normal".
Jew, yes, invalid, no.
On the other hand, a childhood friend of Mr. Cohen testifies to the visibility of his handicap. This is even the reason why the school management had put him in his room, to protect him.
11)- The truth for whom?
"We owe this truth to the victim and his family, to whom I send my condolences," concluded Eric Mathais,
You owe the truth first to the "French people" in whose name justice is served. This is how you will pay homage to this dead person and protect the living concerned.
12)- Conclusion
As it is, once again, an equivalent acquittal will be pronounced in the name of the crowd effect perfectly mastered by the community thugs.
You have to be a Minister or Head of State to go to prison these days.
I ask you to please retain the count of Assault on a mentally handicapped person who took the conscious risk of causing death, this risk having been followed by effect.
Please accept, Mr. Public Prosecutor, my sincere greetings,
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire