region, crime, witness tampering

google translation translation reference text in French.


Paris, Monday, November 5, 2012


Copy to:President of the RepublicMadam Attorney
Your Ref. 12/00 282 (quoted in all correspondence)N. No. :a-Call September 27, 2012Rationale of the b-12 October 2012The Memorandum No. 2 The following is the sequel and complement the Memorandum No. 1 October 12, 2012 accompanying the call sent to the Attorney-General 27 September 2012.
Mr. Attorney GeneralWhenever titled scoundrels are found both cornered and strong, it is they who arraign the Republic and not the Republic that led to the bench of the accused.
PREAMBLEIn Memory of First Call, October 12, I responded to the factual question of the truth or falsity of the assertion of Mr. Prosecutor that there is "no criminal offense "in the texts of August 17 and September 7, he reported.I think I have established that it is false.Mr. prosecutor would be hard to keep his remarks in public. It is indeed difficult to sustain an audience of honest citizens that there is "no offense" to divert for 4 days smig a day per person, under the pretext of a nonexistent work .
 Regarding the car used unduly by Huchon, the text of September 7 is accompanied by a reference to precedents established by judges attesting to the criminal offense.However, this approach to the decision to prosecute is just inadequate but incomplete. It does not answer all the questions raised by it.In the case of text classification, Prime Memory explores the relationship between true and false with respect to the classification rationale. I consider the reports of nolle prosequi its own arguements.In the case of alleged offenders, Prime Memory comes on the presentation of crime facts reported by the press and attributed to alleged offenders.I now answer the following questions:a-Is there one under legal alleged criminal actions alleged offenders? Have they tried to impose a particular through these actions?b-What does Mr. Prosecutor class without result when these two particular texts?This requires entering the privacy of each text word for word to examine what law the floor by this decision.We'll see that these two parties developed, each one on their side, concomittente legal policy and complementary.This is not a decision that Mr. prosecutor wants to endorse the Court of Appeal. This is a policy.This is the definition of the judicial policy that is the second dedicated memory.I will explain:1 - The political legal déinquants suspects.2 - The legal policy of the prosecutor of the Republic.3 - The Conclusion

PART 1: The policy and legal objectives of alleged offenders.1) - Purpose of the studyDuring the summer of 2012, news reports led me to write six requests for opening a preliminary investigation.In these applications, as well as the Memorandum of Appeal, I've studied the content of the alleged offenses and criminal.I want to study here that alleged offenders seek to impose in practice juridiciaire in French society, and therefore judges.These applications have been written taking into account that these press reports are generally recognized as credible. This recognition is the result of the vox populi, which includes the information professions, and the courts, whenever asked about it by judgment dissatisfied with such information. Moreover, in this case, no information has been challenged in court. While people are under the customary defamation.2) - The factsThese applications involve three specific questions regarding:1 - President Sarkozy
 Thursday, July 19 and Friday, July 27 to July 4, article.2 - Mr. BartoloneOn Monday, August 6, for the article of 27 June 2012.3 - Huchon and his teamThis is a group of four texts specifically related to newspaper articles.a-The first is from August 17 to August 14 article.b-The second is from August 28 to August 22 article.c-The third and August 30 to August 29 article.d-The fourth is September 7th article of September 5.Each of these applications to open a judicial inquiry is one or more criminal offenses accurate.But are not limited, and we remember:1 - President SarkozyHead of state at the time of faits.Actuellement member of the Constitutional Council.It would have required a Member to give him a blowjob. He would have used for this purpose formulas and terms specific to this category of rapists.In doing so, he would at least:a-Raped simultaneously:- A woman- A Member of- A representative of the Legislative Branch by a representative of the Executive Branch,- The Constitutionb-created center Hotels prostitution, pimping.c-Violated the rules of the tax code by undeclared work.2 - Mr. BartolonePresident of the General Council of Seine-Saint-Denis at the time. Currently President of the National Assembly.It would have created a situation of aid and return between a politician and racketeer.He would have supported the interests of a racketeer with a Prime Minister or Minister of Finance.In turn, this would have affairi offered participation in private hunting, various benefits, particularly the cost of a birthday is manifestly a springboard for his political career.Personal enrichment and returns would then be inevitable obvious.He calls this racketeer "My brother" and pretend that this is a legal reason. In other words, replace it right "brothers" or Mafia law, the civil law of the republican state.3 - Huchon et alPresident of the Regional Council of Ile de France.Elected leaders and senior employees of the Regional Council.Huchon is directly involved on denunciation likely frames consecutively honest and repression against Mr. Director General of CRT, Mr. Blat. On the other hand, it is ultimately Huchon that supports all public responsibilities in this case. That is why I take it as the representative of the Council officials.The Regional Council of Ile de France would be crossed by a fight, clear and public, between the honest employees and executives who are corrupted.Corruption has at least one supporting the Regional Tourism Committee, or CRT, responsible for the promotion of tourism.This organization is a mutual friends for the political parties represented at the Regional Council, and a cow responsible for organizing the distribution of public funds to elected officials and some senior employees. By means, among other unnecessary travel professionally.Following revelations of corruption by at least one frame employee, witness tampering offense was committed.All these texts are sent a copy to the President of the Republic.On 18 September 2012, Mr. Prosecutor shall prepare a notice of nolle prosequi.It reads:"RE: Your letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012N / Ref: 12/00282 (to be quoted in all correspondence)I have received your letters of 17 August 2012 and 7 September 2012 that caught my attention.But I can not give them away because they do not refer to any criminal offense.Accordingly, I proceed to a nolle prosequi.P / ATTORNEY OF THE REPUBLICBrigitte FRANCESCHINIFirst Deputy Prosecutor "I Call on September 27 of this decision.Memory of the October 12, on the bottom I answer the question of the presence or absence of criminal offenses.For the text of 17 August, it is clear that y personal enrichment and violation of administrative practices legal deception. Called an "abuse of law".For the text of the September 7, it is clear that the enrichment is also present. Case law addresses issues raised by the allegations.Abuse of rights is thus defined by M ° Gastaud:- "There is abuse of rights. Fraud the law. Letter of the law is observed. On against the spirit of the law is bafoué.Les means appear legal. The end is not.".September 10, 2012, I sent these texts copy to Ms. La Garde des Sceaux.On September 14, Mr. Chef de Cabinet of the President of the Republic, replied:"The Chief of Cabinet of the President of the RepublicDear Sir,The President of the Republic received the mail you want to send it to me and entrusted the care of you.Be sure it has been taken careful note of your approach.I beg you to accept, Sir, the assurances of my best.Pierre BesnardRefer to: PDR/SCP/CDO/AES/A005882 "The notice of nolle prosequi is dated September 18.It is difficult to believe that Mr. Prosecutor has not been informed of these procedures and it has ignored in its deliberations and decision.3) - Advertising factsThe classification decision occurs in a particular context and original.None of the offenses reported has been produced clandestinely. Quite the contrary.Each of these alleged crimes are held in public and the perpetrators voluntarily take public witness.Sarkozy, organized rape and alleged pimping at a discount decoration. It calls an MP in a ceremonial hall. It does just after decorating the Prime Minister autrichien.Tout is carefully calculated for that to know and tell.Mr. Bartolone, organizes the business premises of the racketeer who is sponsoring the reception given policy on the occasion of his birthday. It gives the perfect reception reception feudal logic to organize his personal promotion with institutional frameworks. It boasts the return of reciprocal services rendered. The mix of genres is to claim the vocabulary mafia. This wheeler is his "brother". This notion of "brother" here is opposable to the legality. It is a legal concept of a right is not based on the Civil Code but the Code Mafia.
Huchon and his team display their provision of public funds for personal purposes as if no one would or could ask them for consideration.Huchon M already has a luxury car. The car that consumes ceremony illegally, knowingly, it does not help. It adds nothing to its prestige or its comfort.It does so only to show above the law.What is the link between all these approaches is the voluntary challenge launched against the Republic and specifically justice.


On the one hand, none of the actors can not ignore that it violates the law.a-No participating Agapes London can not ignore it spends more than a day without smig corresponding contribution to the growth of tourism in the Ile de France.b-Huchon can not ignore that it does not legally offending vehicle.On the other hand, each actor insists that the attacks against the law to know.It is clear that these executives want to act in the public practice of law as their favorite criminal forces involved in the formation of a dedicated case managers in some networks. It would be creative right.4) - Duralite legalSome would argue that these alleged criminals do not want publicity they protest when the facts are disclosed their misdeeds.They protest that to prevent the risk of popular knowledge, ie political facts. From this knowledge universal public control frameworks fades and justice must come out of public service.That's what they are protesting against.They protested against in any way that network managers are informed of work in violation of the law course, the acceptance of it by the judiciary, the possibility of formation of a double feudal law and open .Is that one of the functions of this crime is precisely to divide the people. Hence these offenders break the indivisibility of the Republic and the continuity of the State.They want to force the government to recognize two kinds of public.For example:1 - The public managersa-DirectlyThe Head of State is that the guests know that the Palace commits rape against an MP.The President of the General Council is that the Council Framework and the Frames PS know that relationships with sulphurous wheeler refuge in Switzerland.President of the Regional Council wants parties, senior employees, the Board or the employees know that illegally monopolizes a public good.Senior employees and elected officials want to know that they are the same in London at taxpayer expense.Indirectly b-From there, they are willing to see the network executives know these facts.It is the role of journalists to propoger for each network frame keeps its books in days.2 - The PeopleBy cons, these same people want to disqualify the masses.People can read information, it should never have the means to discuss and make policy.He should never see the crimes of executives discussed or considered.a-mediaTo construct a dam between public managers, public popular among executives and justice, the media uses writing processes that signal the network executives if you just note the information or whether to continue debate.Eg- "More subtle than firebrand, a pamphlet less direct, but no less fierce: a narrative key acidity crunches with a five-year life of ordinary politics in the Hauts-de-Seine, five years of depravity. ".- "Cooking policy loses its charm when it is bitten way too realistic. 'One can cite examples shovel.In other words, I want to inform, but beware: no debate!This is the principle of "voice off" approach to public informationt said.This is a privatization of public speaking.No network connection will not resume information into a public debate open to all.b-The BBCThe case currently being discussed in England, under the leadership of Prime Minister Cameron, star presenter of the BBC, is a classic.The presenter has violated for years dozens of young girls on his workplace, including the offices of the BBC.When we wanted honest journalists after his death, to report on the facts alleged, the BBC has censored their reporting. It will be released by a third string.Justice has done nothing by itself.c-CyclingMr. Armstrong has been stripped of his title winner of the Tour de France 7 times.It took that to be the U.S. authorities to do so.The French government or European have not been able. Then they were responsible.The information worked that way which indicates that encrypted network executives need to know what to expect but to ensure that the people, ie the political and judicial debate, does not interfere.3 - The cases citedIt is the same with the characters of the crimes which we are over with the public authorities.Mr Sarkozy attacks the book Ms. Guillaume that to mean that all those who speak would be considered enemies. And obviously, everyone is afraid of this clan of adventurers.Mr. Bartolone found to exhibit normal ties with racketeer. He knows that the lock is secured.Huchon suit. There is only the exact extent of a possible spillover into public debate, therefore legal. In the case of a possible overflow public or judicial, it represses.This is the legal significance of this repression Mr. prosecutor ignores and he wants us to ignore.
 This is exactly the political journalists and Mrs. William.Let us stay informed but us.All these people do not want at any price, nor the intervention of public, political debate, or the intervention of the judiciary, the opening of a preliminary investigation.For this, they should disqualify the facts. This is not serious, it's funny, their management is one of professional quality frames, etc..5) - The testThese alleged offenders have reason to act guidelines.a-The concrete benefit.Delinquency, these people have access to activities that their personal financial resources do not allow their.Delinquency, they may engage in activities that are not permitted to people as it should. Rape a woman with impunity has become very difficult nowadays. It is a privilege to do so. A must.b-Test Republic.Like other groups today, these frameworks and networks they represent, want to see how far they can go too far at time T.If the state says no, they recede and deliver it later.If the state let go, they go further, ever further.The benchmark is the renvesement of the Republic and the installation of a right differentialist I call feudal we can call otherwise.ConclusionThis duality is certainly still legal. Actors crime brought to the attention of the justice want it to become a principle of law. Porosity observed by all specialists from the world of the State and civil crime can only grow.
Part 2: The policy of the prosecutor of the Republic1) - PreambleIn this second part of the second memory, I want to examine the policy implemented by Mr. Prosecutor.It's fine to take it up with those we despise, yet it must not extend the criminal action is brought to the attention of the court.It is therefore necessary to enter into the intimacy that text verbatim to examine what law the floor by this decision.The prosecutor establishes the ranking on the certainty of having built a relationship of exteriority between justice and the facts alleged. Judges are not bound in any way to these facts. They make a calm judgment.The immediate question raised by the seizure of two texts on four texts Huchon group is as follows:1 - The prosecutor publishes two rankings without consequences.2 - Why not 4?3 - Why the first and fourth texts they are not followed up and not the second and third texts?4 - Why is there no mention of the 2nd and 3rd law?Mr. prosecutor is as if the two texts cited had been selected as parqu'ils were received they were perfectly alone or separable from the others.2 - Texts and linksMr. prosecutor can not argue that these texts are not interrelated.Reading the letters to Mr. Prosecutor, we find the following links between texts:1 - Our letter dated Tuesday, August 28:In Ref. : Our letter of 17 August 2012Introduction by:- "The newspaper" The Chained Duck ", Wednesday, 22 August 2012, provides a complement to the request for a judicial inquiry that I made to you on August 17 ... ";
 Chapter 1:"The distribution of positions is not necessarily criminal in itself. In fact, this is one of the functions of elected officials to recommend people.This action becomes criminal when it is manifest that accompanies grabbing public funds for specific purposes, they were collective, and a diversion of official objectives of the entity. 'Conclusion:"The involvement of CRT in the adventure of the delegation of the Olympics is not a coincidence. The CRT had a function can be honest initially became a means to include corruption in the ordinary operation of the Regional Council of Ile de France. '2 - Article of 29 August 2012:"The revelations of the" Duck "on the Regional Tourism Committee (CRT) in the Ile-de-France, became the piston machine politicians in the region, have earned a serous avoinée the Director General of the agency, Jean- Pierre Blat But this is not to be hired by the dozen children, spouses, relatives or friends of the heart of its elected leaders rallied her bracesHis mistake: he confessed to waterfowl that "in 47% of cases, the presence of employees (tourism committee) is in connection with regional politicians or their political past." Since Blat was asked to retract his confession,,, "3 - Our letter of 30 August 2012.It is consequential to the cited article of August 29.A-Introduction"Re: Request to open a preliminary investigation (cont'd: 3)N. No. :a-du17 letters and August 28, 2012b-The Chained Duck, Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012. P.3."The squeaking of the piston engine." And Dominique Hervé Liffran Simonnot. "B-Text:- 1st and 2nd paragraph: Relates to the CRT and texts 1 and 2.- 3rd paragraph: Relates text on the alleged misconduct of Mr. Sarkozy.3 - Article 5 September"The other local elected who practiced this sport have also been persecuted by evil judges moons.But to discourage Huchon Saab to ride the beautiful roads of France ... "4 - Our letter of 7 SeptemberA-Introduction- "N. No. :a-du17 letters and August 28, 2012b-The Chained Duck, Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012. P.3."The squeaking of the piston engine." And Dominique Hervé Liffran Simonnotc-Letter of August 30. 'B-textSecond paragraph:"If this newspaper insists and, by publishing an article every week on the institutionalization of corruption in the Regional Council of Ile de France is a number of frames of the Ile-de-France have enough to watch helplessly, even participate in this orgy of corruption to ensure the feudal ideology of elected officials. 'Third paragraph:"I request the opening of a preliminary investigation into the issues raised in the letters that have been sent. Or facts relating to Mr. Sarkozy, Mr. Bartolone, the Regional Council of Ile de France, the call certainly policeman. 'We see that the four texts are held, entangled, are justified by one another.It is impossible to understand:a-The first text without knowing and studying the second dealing with the operation of the CRT.b-The role of CRT without knowing it digs into the fracturesRegional Council.c-The purpose of these collaborations executive employees of the Council with the press without knowing the existence of opposition to illegalities.By these revelations, the opposition makes public the internal struggle that book. She knows that by doing so it calls for justice.It is impossible to understand the article of September 5 and September 7 letter without repression quoted in the article of 29 August and submitted to the court by letter of 30 August. Executives released a honest example of personal crime Huchon President to warn that any punishment would be followed revelations.Mr. prosecutor can not say that it separates these texts because of their dissimilarity, their heterogeneity. They constitute a homogeneous and united.
Conclusion1 - Mr. prosecutor does not take two consecutive texts.2 - It does not take more than two texts of the same series interspersed receive texts from another series.3 - It is the first and last text of the same series in which each text is organically linked to the other.4 - It is therefore organizing the concealment of intermediate texts.5 - This occultation is done knowingly.This process is not natural. It is calculated. The entry of these two texts is Manoeuvrist.3) - Specificity and conflict between managersThere are "criminal offense", it is certified by judges in similar cases.Without classifying result, Mr. Prosecutor finds no abscence of a criminal offense, as he says. He closes the door to investigations relevant to the judicial conpréhension facts.Mr. Prosecutor is violently party to block any investigation preliminary characterization of concealing facts as criminal by the jurisprudence cited by employees who have requested the press to know the public and the judges.He can not just say he is sovereign. It is another thing to use its power Apreciation of prosecutorial discretion.This is not Mr. Salomone, or the press, outside the facts that judges cite comparaîtres with established jurisprudence. Senior employees are honest or resistant.On the one hand, the press would not have known without them.On the other hand, it is clear that information on the car Huchon is a reprisal payroll to employee ratonade frame that is displayed with the press in the termination of CRT, the second text, hidden, and therefore Crime confirmation trip to London, the first text classified.Obscuring the reference to the law and rejecting a backhand personal enrichment is evident that the accaparrement private luxury vehicles spéfiquement reserved for public functions prestige, Mr. Prosecutor built thus decision that misrepresents the facts.It ignores calls from employees of the Regional Council. It takes advantage of the leaders for abuses.This coup is not taking sides in a conflict that opposed Mr. Salomone Mr Huchon.The conflict between the executive employees honest, we do not know the name of Mr. Blat, Mr Huchon and others whose political group leaders and executives who are their allies in these cases.The classification of this text takes us into the specificity of this folder isolation and classification of these two texts is to hide.These errors are not highlighted by individuals. Mr. Salomone mail is the transmission of an e-thirds presented by the press.This is the third that meets Mr. Prosecutor.Who are they?They are not victims. They are in no way personally affected directly by the mistakes made by the leaders fault.They are not in the case of the member violated.These are the executives, Directors General, the General Council of Ile de France.5) - Disqualication framesWhen Mr. Prosecutor class mail from Mr. Salomone September 7, he set up an operation disqualication of these executives and elected officials and employees who support them.These people are the representatives of the law to the Regional Council.The only employee who is involved publicly because he is an executive, Mr. Blat is: Managing Director of Regional Tourism Committee (CRT) in the Ile-de-France, a public body.It is not a victim. This is a senior officer of the State. He is accountable for the practice of law in the administration he leads.Expressly stating that to enrich themselves, to Offir days off undue be absent from work without lawful reason, to make false reports of activities to the administration service an illegal enterprise, has no criminal offense, Mr. Prosecutor does not refer Mr Director-General of his misery CRT staff, it disqualifies professionally.In addition, it is involved in the composition of the legal government in legalizing their political nepotism. It will be hard to say that it is the attention to scrupulous observance of the separation of powers.Mr. prosecutor says Huchon not commit "No offense" using a car it is prohibited to use. It ignores the precedents established by other judges. He refuses to acknowledge in the article of September 5 frames concerns employees CR.In doing so, it disqualifies managers who manage the ad hoc administration.- "This premium car was purchased by the Region in May 2011, 44 150 euros. At one end, said a letter signed by the Director General of services to be "used by the regional representation, including the President at official ceremonies. ". It is therefore impossible to borrow as does Huchon. 'What is a Chief services these days? Mr. Prosecutor invalid publicly the legal value of the signature of the Director.The Director General of services is also disqualified.That does not tell us we do not know the concerns of executives. Mr. Blat takes care to tell the press:- "Do not search, I did the math"Calculations, these ladies and gentlemen have done much more. It would suffice to ask them.This disqualification extends to all other sequences of their responsibilities.Thus, Mr. Director General of CRT was beaten for telling the press that:- "In 47% of cases, the presence of employees (tourism committee) is in connection with regional politicians or their political past."Mr public prosecutor says that senior employees so leaders of the Regional Council are incompetent to judge the proper use of the right to Regional Council on:- Cars,- Public funds,- From the rules of employment.Repression of their interventions on these issues becomes legal.
M.le prosecutor does not recognize the illegality of fraudsters. He knows organize the field against the legality of retaliation against those who expose fraud.M.le prosecutor built for this purpose a case management of public finances Royal (London), nepotism (CRT), arbitrary (Ratonade), despotism (Car).Decisions will certainly dates. We thought we'd be rid of the practice of law in 1789 and 1945.By classifying these two texts as they do not contain "No offense," Mr. prosecutor disqualifies the executives of the Regional Council who have indicated otherwise. And the networks they embody. All those who are responsible for implementing works democratic and administrative arrangements do not support the criminal misuse of legal forms.We see that as a function of separation of the group of texts Huchon, extraction of two pieces, the dimming of the other two. The senior employees disqualication honest. Consolidation of networks dishonest leaders.Mr. Prosecutor consolidates border public training factious this activity a second law.There's another one.6) - hidden textsA Truth-criminal offendersHowever, Mr. PROSECUTOR Republic can deny the existence of criminal offenses as much as he wants. It can not prevent offenders know they have committed, to worry about those they have committed, the risks involved because of denunciations which they are subject.Nobody disputes the veracity of the allegations. The convening of Mr. Director Genral of the CRT to obtain his denial is a serious position on the criminalization of alleged facts.B-The public hearingWe know that the only risk they take into consideration are the political risks. These mean that the information has overwhelmed the context of networks of colleagues to reach the public, and the then justice.As we have seen précéement these offenders do not worry no publicity for their actions. As it is between people of the same world, these acts are contrary to gradually form a kind of parallel civil code. Such as the Code "brothers" asserted by Mr. Bartolone.By cons, they intervene when they think the general public, the classes could be informed to the point of making a political issue. Then it becomes political.Mr. Sarkozy C-It is for this reason that Mr. Sarkozy mobilizes against the release of the book Mrs. William.It mobilizes the sarkozye, not to prevent the "it" to know. Instead, it held that "it" for "it" to know, to diffuse, to jurisprudencialise. It mobilizes networks to serve all "it" must stop there. This is Ira said Mr. Balkany Canal +. This is the logic that resume example, The Chained Duck, Le Nouvel Observateur, we quote.Each other and do nothing but demand that refute the "it" remains a self-between frames.Admitting guilt masochistic Mrs. William means it accepts this logic. It may therefore find work. Journalists rely on withdrawal are not to go forward.And all is well that ends well.D-Mr. BartoloneMr Tapie receiving his party organized under the laws of "brothers", Mr. Bartolone has already told all those in the know that marigo is well represented in its receptions. It's good for the silence necessary for elections between people as it should.Sleep good people!E-HuchonHowever, with Huchon et al, executives compromise Regional Council, things get complicated imperceptibly. Mr. prosecutor who is a connoisseur of the law will not have failed to perceive anyway.This is the raison d'être of the organization of the occultation of the two central texts temporally among the four that have been addressed.7) - Witness TamperingHuchon not do to journalists, competitors, adventurers, etc.. It is intended for employees of his administration, which is more of Heads of the administration.This is not an inquiry but a single institutional confrontation.If Huchon let go, institutional mechanisms can be put in motion. Either labor or opposition (Ms. Pécresse, former minister, candidate for M.Huchon, ask questions, even if isolated from its own), or other institutions (taxes can sometimes cause trouble mechanically ). Etc..
Huchon must show that he is a captain in the boat. The information is good, solidarity colleagues face the vast world full of danger, is better.
Accordingly, Mr. Blat is summoned. By whom? The investigation alone will tell. He was ordered to return to his remarks. The press tells us: "Since Blat was asked to retract his confession."I do not know why the press uses the term "confession". This is a possible slip.However, the term goes back to the same logic as the writings of Mrs. William. It uses a novel logical to give us a true crime that she also wants to conceal the scope of justice.Nobody reverses the facts.It is the same for Mr. Blat and those who informed the press about the use of cars by Huchon in person. These people are certainly not Mr. Blat, but they are probably Heads of services. Otherwise the newspaper probably not cite the writings of a Director General in this episode. In addition, they are clearly in support Director clan with their colleague. Public information on the car is also a warning to those who called their colleague.Mr. Blat tells us that the CRT is corrupted into its composition. It confirms that the action of the TRC "Agapes London." Nepotism, personal enrichment, violation of all administrative rules for hiring. All this has been extensively discussed in the text of the August 17 and in the call of October 12.
Huchon not deny the facts. It simply requires that they be concealed. He did not ask Mr. Blat to recognize that he lied. He just wants to accept denial.However, these facts are judicial.Certainly, there is no complaint from Mr. Blat.But there are already two requests for opening of criminal investigations.Here is the table:1 - Wednesday, August 14, 2012. Article Chained Duck.
 Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor
 Friday, August 17, 2012. Letter to the President of the Republic2 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012. Article Chained Duck.
 Tuesday, August 28, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor3 - Wednesday, August 29, 2012. Article Chained Duck. (Announcement of the withdrawal of admissions of Mr. Blat)
 Thursday, August 30, 2012. Letter to Mr. Prosecutor4 - Wednesday, 5 September 2012 Article of the Chained Duck
 Friday, September 7, 2012. Letter to Mr. ProsecutorWe see that the convening of Mr. Blat is after the receipt of the complaint by Mr. Prosecutor. August 17. She is also back to mail received by the President of the Republic.It is not absurd to think that the direction of the Regional Council is aware that legal action is underway from August 17, due to the issue dated 14 August Chained Duck.She was able to call Mr. Blat soon as his name appears in the next issue of the journal, August 22.It is urgent to prohibit senior Council to testify.This highlights the willingness of employees to express their oppostion honest practices in force.As soon as Mr. Blat is called the Chained Duck after the case is informed of this meeting and its grounds, Article fate next week, August 29.Then, in retaliation and warning indicated in Chained Duck Mr Huchon engages in practices prohibited by the law. The article appears in the following week, on September 5.It is characteristic that these items follow from week to week. It's a real tussle within the Regional Council.This session is not forced withdrawal of the statement by the management of an invalidation of the facts mentioned by Mr. Blat on the grounds that they would be false in any manner whatsoever.This question the veracity of the facts is not mentioned by the Directorate or by Mr. Prosecutor. We do not want to discuss it, that's all.However, it changes the status of the discussion.Management does not argue his point of view. She just wants to compel Mr. Blat to deny its own, because it's not consistent with the management.However, the point of view of Mr. Blat is not a civil point of view. It is a judicial point of view. He denounced publicly delinquent activities. Therefore, during the meeting Mr. Blat, these facts fall asleep and already legal action. By the press, by Mr. Salomone.Asking Mr. Blat lying to oneself, the Directorate of Regional Council asks M.Blat to misrepresent the facts to justice, lying to him. It prevents, by coercion, M. Blat bring his remarks to justice in any way whatsoever.She knows that a request for a preliminary inquiry is submitted.This is therefore constitutive of an offense of Bribery of witness.9) - The role of prosecutorsSeptember 10, 2012, I sent these texts copy to Ms. La Garde des Sceaux.On September 14, Mr. Chef de Cabinet of the President of the Republic, replied:On September 18, Mr. Prosecutor class the request of 17 August and 7 September.What is the function of this distinction in two articles in the same group. a-texts publicly recognized and classifiedb-The hidden text.

We have seen that the distinction between the two texts, apparently technical, factual, leads Mr. prosecutor in the disqualification of managers of the Regional Council. It is no longer outside. He was involved himself. It is not serene, it is partisan.The concealment of texts intermediates, 28 and 30 August, corresponding to the articles 22 and 29, leads Mr. prosecutor on another ground.Obscuring the texts interim, Mr. prosecutor has the means to ignore the debate within the Council.But this ignorance is impossible. It is fake, cunning, deceptive.Mr. prosecutor knows there is a conflict within the Regional Council and some of the executives organize public questioning of judges, through press.It is also possible that they thought a seizure by the prosecution elected. Elected officials being completely locked by the distributions of positions and annuities is that citizens take the initiative to challenge judges.Without further classifying the two texts êtrémités, Mr. Prosecutor gives the impression to use its power of opportunity in matters strictly technical. We have seen that there is nothing. It disqualifies professional executives, employees, the Regional Council. It borders the judicial support networks dishonest antics of the Council. Thus, it allows these networks to demonstrate to employees that the Council is only business managements sovereign internal Council.It goes without saying that Mr. prosecutor moved there a law which will now be claiming all jurisdictions face this kind of situation. Private communities continue their demand to be tried by magistrates private. As in the case Tapie gave the example to the public.Mr. prosecutor knows that the two texts that occult instalent action honest and competent employees in the debate. He knows that this subject Mr. Salomone is the transmitter of the application of these employees.
 He knows this and that is because he knows these texts censorship. This occultation turns reading legal texts recognized. They appear as technical texts as they are the manifestation of public condemnation by competent employees.
The question of jurisdiction is crucial. Mr. Prosecutor sweeps a backhander requests Mr. Salomone. Everyone will think that a chap has no competence to judge or prejudge the guilt of persons so great. By cons, if the prosecutor retains the opinion of Mr. Chief services or Mr. Director General of Regional Tourism Committee, the famous CRT, it is quite otherwise.That is the role of the occultation of the offense of Bribery voluntary control.Mr. Prosecutor can still remove a formula from a Director if it is a quote from a journalist. SINCE recess truncated, distorted, taken out of context. This is the text of 28 August, following the August 22 article.
 By cons, if the prosecutor retains the text of the August 30 consecutive Article August 29, it must examine the qualification of Bribery of witness. In this case, it must give the floor to the Director-General himself. It is no longer possible to use delaying tactics and socially abject moral contortions to disqualify the word citizen Mr. Salomone.Contrary to what we want to believe the prosecutors, the occultation of the two texts intermediaries who report the name of a prostestataire and illegal repression which it is subject is voluntary.Mr. prosecutor engaged there in a voluntary exercise in which he puts his duties as prosecutor in the service of paralysis legal action to ensure impunity for certain types of offenders.Indeed, we can be certain that no further action before the rankings of all applications. As usual when the judicial action requests impede those judges consider to be above the common laws.10) - What does the proc hiding the DST?Forcing the threat a Director General to reconsider his statements, the direction of the Regional Council concerned is guilty of Bribery of witness and at least the organization of a concerted barrier to justice information by organized falsification of facts through the repression of witnesses, that they and all that impressed repression.This maneuver is illegal and made public by the newspaper article.

Mr. prosecutor can not say he does not know. It is public and it is formally submitted to its attention. By employees of the Council through the newspaper and citizen action Mr. Salomone.Obscuring the texts interim, Mr. Prosecutor legitimizes Bribery of witness.It remains to say that he does not legalize for anyone that the right is not the same for everyone.Rankings by no later he has already disqualified the Council executives who brought the corruption of the Council to press for justice's knowledge.By occultations, it brings certainty to corrupt leaders that they are masters of their own and they have the word, and therefore the person employees as they see fit. Outside the rules of public law.By concealing two texts and classifying the other 2, Mr. Prosecutor will not consider requests for reports preliminary initiations and ratonade suffered by Mr. Blat. Also need the silence of the lambs.For this, Mr. Prosecutor ensured that the common crime itself organizes its relations to civil justice.The entry of these two texts organizes occultation of the other two.The classification of these two texts organized:- The disqualification of managers of the Regional Council responsible for implementing the law in the public FUNCTIONING Council.- Participation in the privatization law in the Council by ensuring that only the Council is source of complaint légétime.- The legitimacy of privatization mechanisms of legitimation by law offenses to prohibit any citizen dispute the facts.
 Mr. prosecutor does not inadvertently. It acts voluntarily, consciously, collegiality.It is not a judge serene. He finds no one outraged innocence as claimed by Judge Salas. It takes advantage of how Manoeuvrist, cunning, clever.Mr. Prosecutor embodies the main policy claim alleged offenders whose acts are brought to its attention.
 They just claim the exercise of a right uneven among citizens. Right for executives. A right for the homeless ranks. Corruption frameworks leads to tiersmondisation France.Anyway, the fact of personal enrichment by elected or administrative duties is illegal.Follow Mr. Prosecutor in its findings back to legitimize action delinquent officers on behalf of inequality in French law. This decision is all the more discriminating as it establishes, by the repetition of this fact, a disqualification of the plaintiffs according to their social class.I ask the Court of Appeal set out the principles of constitutional law.
ConclusionRatings without these suites M.le prosecutor organizes an obscurantist juridiciaire that supports executives thugs against the executives honest.Mr. Prosecutor has not filed without further requests for a nobody. He took part in a fight in the French public administration between executives. He ruled in favor of executives thugs.
 Mr. prosecutor does not only defend factual situations. It organizes the legalization procedures crimininelles to legally enslave honest people to offenders, such as the Bribery of witnesses.This process is based on religious devices. They say that the hand of a woman is equal to man and other enact a penal code article saying that if a woman was beaten by her husband "with good intentions" and no damage interest can be requested.There is no doubt that Mr. Prosecutor disposif extend this support representatives of the Executive Branch officials who violate the Legislative Power.It will be the same for the support frameworks that support their career elected on fraternal relations with private financiers. The fact of establishing a system of reciprocity in using financial vehicles and elected vice-versa will be declared without "No offense." In doing so, Mr. Prosecutor recognize the Code "brothers" in place of the Civil Code.Case law and established by Mr. prosecutor will be understood by those who have the means to study and its universal application. What is now called the generic term lobbies.For example:a-rape of a representative of another public authority may extend the rape of a representative of public power by the representative of civil power. Today, the action Danone and Coca-Cola has already replaced the bonds for placement reference. Demand for legal recognition will follow.b-The Code "brothers" Italian may extend Sharia "brothers" Muslims.c-The superiority of the Council of thugs frames frames honest Council is itself a universal model.This is not exhaustive. Reality quickly provide concrete examples to replace these simple logical evidence.One of the reasons that crime is director of the desire to test the capabilities of defense and decline of the Republic. Mr. prosecutor gives them reasonI request the removal of these rankings and suites without opening these preliminary investigations.
Marc Salomone