Marc Salomone / 06.28.22.88.96 /
salomone.marc@neuf.fr
blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The
two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris, Friday, May 29, 2020
REFLECTION ON THE NEW 'COLD WAR'
IMPOSED BY THE UNITED STATES ON THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC);
THE LOGICAL DUALITY OF EXTERIORITY AND INCLUSIVITY; THE PROCESSES OF
INCLUSION OF THE CHINESE COMMUNISTS AND THE AMERICAN LIBERALS.
(Continuation of the reflection of
April 20, 2020)
1. Preamble
Whereas, by its efficiency, China
imposes the authority of its state; the United States gives the great
organs of the anti-Chinese offensive.
They are again organizing a "Cold
War".
a- It primarily targets the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) ruling the Chinese People's Republic (RPC).
b- It takes up the ordinary themes of
American action: the criminalization of the state concerned and the
racketeering of its finances.
Now it won't stop.
French academics have theorized this
confrontation by noting that, in history, all situations of
competition between an aging dominant power and an emerging dominant
power have always had war as the only solution. They cite the example
of the confrontation between Germany and England before 1914.
On May 24, 2020, Chinese Foreign
Minister Wang Yi spoke on two points. It is part of the two axes of
the global American offensive against China.
1- It notes that China and the United
States are "on the brink of a new cold war". He said China
is ready to take up the challenge.
It is exactly the same term used by
French commentators.
2- He declares that China is "ready"
for international cooperation to identify the source of the new
coronavirus. But such cooperation must refrain from any "political
interference".
This new American policy has another
effect. It places the Chinese Communist Party, which leads the
People's Republic of China, faced with a challenge.
The following reflection is devoted to
the logic of this challenge from a European point of view.
1) - The challenge
One of the decisive techniques of this
“Cold War” strategy is to organize the exteriorization of the
power aimed at with regard to the state network controlled by the
Western camp (first the United States and Europe which is today
European Union (EU).
a- The disqualification of
international organizations where China is present and which escape
the USA is part of the maneuver.
b- The ousting of Huawei from 5G is
also a part of this externalization device.
The CCP therefore faces the following
challenge:
1- Either, the PRC which he directs
locks himself in the bunker of a policy of "exteriority".
It peddles around the world a policy
known as the "Berlin Wall".
2- Either, the PRC is part of an
"inclusiveness" policy.
It is included in the western societies
which are the places of the current world direction.
The German Federal Republic (FRG) can
serve as a reference:
a- Before the Maastricht Treaty, she
was said to be an economic giant and a political dwarf.
b- Since joining the EU, things have
changed.
As long as the PRC remains in this
configuration of exteriority, all the States concerned are in the
perspective of war, even "cold".
In this case, all, including China, are
subordinate to the American device.
2) - exteriority
The registration of the PRC in the
logic of exteriorization where the Western party wants to assign it
is noticeable in the type of offensive, of response, which it opposes
the American offensive of the Cold War.
1- In this type of response, the PRC is
present by:
a- Its economic power.
b- Its embassies and local extensions
c- Its relationships in the networks of
indigenous executives.
d- The local diaspora and its members
become influential people, even powerful, locally.
2- In this case, the means of
discussion between China and the European authorities, local or
federal, are inevitably locked by the Western party which holds all
the levers of orders.
They are reduced to the strict
discussion of economic relations and power relations.
The diaspora will itself be locked into
a local exteriority. The Chinese will be a kind of Arab of Israel.
This conclusion is not imaginary since
it is exactly the logic which is essential today.
The fight that the PRC embassy is
waging for the manifestation of the truth has been recovered as a
major piece of the "Wall" that the western camp built
around it, that is to say of the PRC and therefore of the CCP.
3) - The misunderstanding
However, this policy no longer
corresponds:
a- To the economic reports of China and
the world.
b- The CCP's inclusive policy since
1979.
1- The novelty
a- China is not a world economic power
because it would be "the workshop of the world". Such a
situation has been unstable and temporary since England invented the
world market.
b- China is equal to the United States
first of all because it is in all the industrial and university
processes of the world and also because it is now in all the
institutions and all the economic centers of the world. It is present
in clubs in Shanghai or Davos.
2- The illusion
By transporting their industries to
China, the Western leaders believed to perpetuate, in a modern form,
the ordinary relationships of exteriority between local sovereignty
and the imperial presence of the West.
They thought they could repeat the
economy of the "Comptoirs" and the town planning of foreign
areas closed "to dogs and Chinese".
3- The reality
In fact, unexpectedly for them, it is
China which has settled in the dominant western world by organizing
its arrival at home.
The CCP therefore achieved in China the
inclusion of the PRC in the world market under the leadership of the
PRC.
4- The inversion
The object of the Cold War is to cause
the CCP to reverse this logic in China's relations with the Western
countries.
China must be in a situation of
exteriority in Western countries.
5- The trap
The CCP must refuse the trap of
exteriority to the western countries which is thus set for it by the
Western party.
It is certainly in an "external"
position in political matters of sovereignty.
However, it would be a step backwards,
and he would neglect his job of establishing himself fully on the
leading economic forms of the world (the market), if he locked
himself in the practices of the "Berlin Wall" ', wanted by
the Americans, in its reports to European countries.
This inclusive political practice does
not only question the CCP. It is already common practice.
4) - The logic of internalization of
power
A- The American presence
1- Europe is linked to the USA by
secular ties of civilization but also because the United States is
present in Europe in an indigenous way.
American logic is represented by
European leaders, companies, administrations, associations.
These entities are not part of the
American diaspora. It’s America installed in Europe. It is part of
Europe.
The privilege of the United States is
to be able to associate supranational organizations such as NATO with
it.
2- For these purposes, since 1945, the
United States has transferred billions of dollars to Europe to
establish its ideological and political leading presence: the economy
in addition.
B- The Muslim presence
Less attention is paid to the presence
of the so-called Islamic protean current. It is, however, remarkable
in terms of our subject.
1- Political financial transfers
a- Thus, in 2013, at the request of
French Muslim associations, in common with the French government the
Emir of Qatar contributed a fund of 100 million euros to subsidize
Muslim Arabs who wanted to open any business .
b- The Maghreb States have funded
hundreds of mosques all over French territory. c- This Muslim
presence is already at the origin of the constitution of territories
of particular administration and jurisprudence.
2- The diaspora
These states can rely publicly on their
diaspora for two reasons:
a- The States concerned are considered
as subordinate States, of the third world, by the Western States.
b- The Muslim diaspora is assigned by
the Western party a political role in the countries of Western Europe
and in their relations with the Muslim countries.
c- For example, the opening of the EU
to Muslim populations, which vary according to the host country, is
the humanist guarantee of Western intervention in China concerning
Xinjiang.
d- This support for Xinjiang can also
be a lever for negotiations with Turkey.
3- The Chinese diaspora
The PRC could not rely on the Chinese
diaspora in the same way. She is in a separate situation.
It is now an equal, competing power to
that of the United States.
If it relies directly and mainly on the
Chinese diaspora, it will quickly be considered singular or even
dangerous.
Links from Chinese embassies and
diasporas will be suspect and monitored.
The media is already calling for
surveillance of executives suspected of being friends of China.
5) - Flattery
This new policy of "containment"
or containment and "Rollback" or repression imposes almost
psychological political mechanisms.
a- Guilt
It aims precisely to cut the ties of
the targeted country everywhere with the Western countries and their
subordinates.
The country subordinated to the
doctrine of exteriority comes to consider its intervention in the
West as an intrusion, a form of clandestinity.
His relationships with Westerners are
made up of conflicts to be mastered or opportunistic accommodation.
b- Flatter
The paradox of this policy, the
condition of its success, is that it exploits, magnifies, even
arouses, the pride of the targeted country to be strange, singular,
isolated.
Not enough attention is paid to the
fact that the Western party has flattered as much as it has fought
against the strangeness of the USSR and the Communist parties.
c- Medusa
In France, the defeat of the PCF in
1981 (it goes from 22% to 15%) is conditioned by the revolutionary
flattery imposed by the leftists from May-68.
The communists were hypnotized by the
verbiage and the so-called revolutionary poses of the "leftists",
"Maoists", "Trotskyists", "anarchists"
and this led to their defeat.
Likewise for the USSR. CPSU leaders
were flattered to be the target of "American imperialism"
after being the target of Nazi Germany: for the same reasons.
It froze and destroyed them.
c- Mobility
The Western party always presents
itself as that of a single camp. However, it attacks from all sides.
He does not neglect any aspect of the fight for his supremacy.
This is what Lenin tried to teach the
Communist parties.
d- The reverse
On the other hand, inclusive states
(the United States, or Muslim countries) trivialize their presence.
6) - Inclusiveness
The PRC must imperatively trivialize
its presence, include it, like the United States, Muslim countries or
others.
a- This imposes that it settles in
Europe as do the Americans or the Muslims.
b- It will then be able to build a
partnership between Europe and China within European societies.
c- This registration in society must be
done, today, according to the canons of Western liberalism; by
Capital and the law.
In this orientation, the networks of
dialogues between Europe (the nations and the federation), and China,
will be able to take the direction of the constitution of a stable,
sustainable, ordinary Europe-China axis.
The European-Chinese partnership axis
will acquire the same evidence as the European-American axis.
Such logic is based on voluntarism,
patience, and above all honesty and loyalty.
Why shouldn't China have the audacity
to retain that it is also European?
7) - The problem of inclusiveness in
China
When the market was included in the
statist socialist economy, the communists of the countries concerned
were faced with a problem.
As soon as private, personal money
became an essential component of power, would the Communists be
included in the capitalist sector or would they remain foreign to it
and exclusively civil servants when they were leaders?
There are many answers to this
question, but they contain a specific answer. Just as the Communists
are in the military, they must be in the capital.
Communists were appointed millionaires
and accompanied the mobilization of energies which followed the
slogan of personal enrichment.
Part of the capital is therefore held
by communist executives.
It is the same in Vietnam and today in
Cuba.
8) - The problem in Europe
Similarly, in Europe, in France, the
CCP must install a capitalist base linked to the PRC and install
people there who guarantee the permanence of this link. Its
organization being distinct.
The Chinese diaspora is particularly
dynamic but it cannot find itself in a situation where its financial
policy would amount to creating a Chinese front on European
territory. It would be going back to the policy of exteriority and
reproducing the Rollback.
It is therefore necessary that
Europeans have ad hoc capital to establish the Chinese presence in
France, in Europe, in the same way as others implant the American
presence.
a- This creation can be the fact of the
public economic power or the private economic powers.
b- It is a medium and long term
commitment.
The difference between China and Europe is that in Europe the acquisition of capital cannot be linked directly to the exercise of a function.
The goal is not to create a Chinese nationalist economic reality; to politicize the diaspora. It does not need this circuit to thrive.
It is to create a European or national societal reality which by its functioning guarantees the joint work of Europe with China
10) - Conclusion
For the moment, the Chinese Communists
can only count on the effects of the power of the nation they rule.
Alone, they lead to isolation.
Having logic is not the best way to
impose your own.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire