lundi, mars 11, 2024

12.03.24, Ukraine, peace, war, primacy, priority, Roussel Fabien, PCF, de Villiers, Kennedy, Jean XXIII

 

Marc Salomone / marcsalomone@sfr.fr / madic50.blogspot.com


Paris, March 12, 2024


For Fabien ROUSSEL / Member of Parliament / Fabien.Roussel@assemblee-nationale.fr


TWO “DYNAMICS”


Mr. Deputy,

The war is in Europe and it is imposing its policies.

The peace that has been enshrined in European political principles for centuries is today just an opinion, even if it is yours.

It does not define any state policy, does not bring anyone together, does not demand anything.

The object of political action in the face of this war in Europe is to define which “dynamic” (that of war or that of peace) makes it possible to take control of it and impose its solutions.


1- The Communist Party calls on “all of our fellow citizens to mobilize and express themselves (..) and to gather in front of the war memorials […] to shine the candles of peace”.

2- In front of the dead our fellow citizens remain silent. They will only express themselves to formulate or support a political line. They will only mobilize if this line becomes a collective, national and European platform.

3- The primary function of a party is therefore not to call on “fellow citizens” but to call on parties and political executives to come together to develop this political platform.

I ask you to take the plunge.

The first question posed to everyone is what takes precedence (or is “in dynamic”) war policy or peace policy.

Should the war party be left free to organize public action and define peace as a result of war or should the peace party be able to subordinate war to its objectives?

You call yourself, statically, the “Peace Party.”

I imagine that you do not believe you are in a position to bring together the 500 million Europeans alone, or with your left-wing “allies”.

In this case, “in dynamics”, all supporters of the primacy of the policy of peace over the policy of war must be able to come together, develop a platform, come together and address all Europeans.

Being the vanguard means bringing together antagonistic networks that think the same way on this subject.

The theoretical references to this policy of the primacy of peace are plural.

You refer to Jaurès, there is Lenin but also a more recent statesman who dealt with this subject, John Kennedy, on June 10, 1963. He thus dealt with the aftermath of the Cuban crisis.

Mr. de Villiers, Minister, from the right, who is on this line of the primacy of peace over war, refers to Mazarin and the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. cf. his intervention on CNEWS on March 2.

Pope ; as already John XXIII, April 11, 1963.

Their distinctions between bleating pacifism and political pacifism, Munich peace and useful peace, pax americana and living peace, etc., cover the same political line.

To this end, I am sending you the two texts that I wrote based on the text by J. Kennedy and the letter that I addressed to Mr. de Villiers.

As everyone sees, the supremacy of peace or war has become the dynamic political issue of the forefront, and undoubtedly soon to be decisive, of the moment.

As in other circumstances, none of the interested parties will abandon their program. However, they must understand that they are saying the same thing on this issue and that they must make it the general European line instead of the war party line which is becoming predominant and which you reject without knowing how to substitute another dynamic. .

Supporters of the primacy of war do not hesitate to publicly consider the transition to atomic war.

Will the supporters of the primacy of peace be able to publicly consider the observation of their convergences, to meet and establish the platform on which to address these 500 million Europeans?

The French Communist Party is particularly well placed to take the initiative of this policy which is a continuation of the Thorezian invention of "the outstretched hand", in 1934. No one is asking to ape or stutter but to create and speak clearly.

This requires reflection, work, action. Please invite us all in our diversity.

Thanking you for your attention and looking forward to hearing from you,

Please accept, Mr. Deputy, the assurance of my cordial greetings,


Marc SALOMONE

Retired worker

Aucun commentaire: