blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The Two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris, Thursday, October 31, 2019
CONTRIBUTION (36) TO THE NATIONAL DEBATE WISHED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC IN 2019.
REFLECTION ON THE REGISTRATION OF TERRORISM, ISLAMIST OR CORSICA, IN A LEGAL FUNCTION, ON THE ORGANIZATION OF A BREAK OF CONTINUITY IN FRENCH LAW, ON THE TWO DIRECTIONS OF VIGILANCE, ON THE PRIMACY OF FREEDOM ON CENSORSHIP.
(Continuation of the contribution October 23, 2019 relating to the opposition of vigilance and freedom, see: madic50.blogspot.com)
THE POSITIVITY OF TERRORISM
1. Preamble
The massacre of October 2, 2019, at the police headquarters of Paris, gives the impression of a mechanics without effects that would reproduce to infinity the madness of the killers and the police stalking.
This is not correct.
This terror has effects on the definition, organization and exercise of the public authorities. In this sense it is a real policy and the Islamist movement a real political party.
1- By the fear that it imposes on the population and the administrative executives, the disqualification that it brings from the State; This terror is first and foremost a place for negotiations between the Islamist party and the masses it influences, and also certain leading networks of French executives.
2- Islamist terror is not the only one that modifies the public authorities. The so-called independence terror in Corsica obtains the same results by similar means.
It is with the evocation of the transactional quality of these terrors, that this reflection is devoted.
2) - the goal
On October 2, 2019, during the massacre of the Prefecture, the Muslim criminal dies voluntarily in combat.
It had no other purpose than to assert the legal presence, violent or not, militants of Islam in the organs of the Executive power and thus to inscribe the terrorist activity Islamist, of which his , in the meshes of the legality.
3) - The waiting time
During the previous attacks, in 1995, it was not until this inscription of terrorism and lawful factionary action was publicly supported on the one hand by academics and the media, and on the other hand produced its positive effects for communitarianism and its correspondents among French leaders on the other hand.
1- In 2015, Friday, November 13, 130 people are massacred at Bataclan, Paris. The positive consequences of the massacres for the Muslim party were then discrete.
For example :
The rulers of terror were vilified.
b- The academics who supported the Charlie-Hebdo massacre on the basis of the proclaimed racism of the French, colonialism and imperialism were opposed.
c- In the field, discreetly, it was otherwise.
Thus, on Thursday, November 20, 2015, eight days after the carnage, at the Saint-Joseph hospital in Paris, a specialist doctor was seen in consultation with a student in a burqa. What he did not do before. Management and justice let it go.
2- In 2019, however, the massacre of the prefecture is immediately theorized by the academic Eric Fassin.
Commenting on this carnage, on the 28mn show, on Arte, he says: "Segregation provokes communitarianism. Terrorism is a crazy response to the real question of the martyrdom of Muslims. "
a- The use of the term "martyr" is an implication of religious concepts in the public debate. In this case, this term refers to Jewish and Muslim religious ideologies.
b- These religious concepts are both political and administrative.
c) This scholar is an invitation to the political alliance of these two religious parties.
d- Moreover, the categories of Islam, Muslims, migrants, Islamism, gangsterism, local terror, cities, Muslim militancy, etc., are implicitly placed in a uniform ideological space by this statement.
4) - The two pillars of the religious hold
This massacre led to a discussion of the Islamic veil during field trips.
This is so because, with circumcision, the religious veil is one of the two pillars of continuity and expansion of the religious hold.
5) - Circumcision
It organizes the separatism of men with the rest of humanity.
a- It is not allowed to discuss it since this administrative practice concerns men and therefore the dominant ones.
b- Conversely, excision is exactly the same work of gutting the vagina of children as Circumcision that cuts the penis of children.
It is discussed and criminalized because it concerns women.
d- These being considered inferior, the modalities of this inferiority can be discussed.
e- These are two pedophile practices.
On May 7, 2012, a Cologne Court in Germany equated "the removal of the foreskin from a prosecutionable injury" and affirmed that "the child's right to physical integrity took precedence over the right to circumcise for religious reasons ".
This decision immediately provoked a clash between two camps:
1- The religions concerned and those who support the form of the German state.
a- The Muslims declare: "Beyond the religious step, it is an act which seals the membership to the community"
b- The Jews say: "I do not see how Jews could continue to live in a country considered as illegal an act constituting their spiritual life. This conflict is impossible to resolve, except to leave Germany, "says conservative Michel Friedman, lawyer and editorialist, former president of the European Jewish Congress.
c- On July 19, national elected representatives asked that (as of this fall of 2012) the government submit to them a text giving a legal framework to non-medical circumcision.
d- "Jews and Muslims must be told that their freedom of belief is guaranteed in Germany". summed up the "responsible religion" of the Greens, Josef Philip Winkler, worried, like many others, of the ineluctable associations with the German past.
Throughout Europe, particularly in France, the decision of the German court was described as a worse attack than Auschwitz.
This indicates that religious leaders do not attach any seriousness to the evocation of historical facts.
2- Civil society
In support of the court decision to criminalize this pedophile practice, the press mentions "many associations for the defense of children's rights, supported by the pediatric federation and the police union".
a- It is clear that there can be no democratic evolution of this community logic as long as its members are penned at birth.
b) There can be no general respect for the child as long as it is possible to cut off the sex of some of them to make them slaves of any doctrine.
c- Men are thus parked in an area of domination, especially on Women. Without being aware of it, by capillarity, this practice supports the entire system of male domination over women.
6) - The religious veil
A- Note
1- The buckler organizes the subordination of the principle of the woman for the man.
a- That it is worn on the head, chest, buttocks, hands, eyes, etc. The only function of the religious veil is to state publicly that women are congenitally slutty, slutty.
a- They are by themselves places of sin and temptation.
b- In the same movement, men appear as carriers of an uncontrollable virility.
c- They are responsible for the excitement of men and guilty of rape to which they lead these men.
d- This guilt of women, by way of natural temptation, by definition, is translated into law in all countries of Muslim dictatorship.
e- It causes civil physical violence throughout the Muslim cultural space. f- For example, during the war in Yugoslavia in 1990, raped Muslim women were repudiated or killed by their husbands who were finally free from communist atheism and the obligation to respect women it imposed.
2- The religious administration
a- Modesty
The religious terms used to describe the veil are "modesty" and "decency".
They appear to be not strictly religious.
This is so because the veiling of women is an administrative function of religion and not a spiritual function.
This confusion with their secular homonyms allows religious to impose on secular terms the evidence of a religious meaning.
But this civil administrative function is well defined by religion and is subject to it.
b- The call to order
This veil is therefore essential for all women. The so-called muslims are simply women who are lucky enough to know.
They wear this veil to affirm the condition of the woman, to warn the public, and to oblige the public and its legal representatives to comply with it.
B- The answer of French executives
1- parties
Apart from the elected representatives of the Republican Party who will never go beyond a timely quarrel and advertising; all the actors of the state apparatus, beginning with the general rapporteur of the Observatory of secularism, took the opportunity to continue the work undertaken for several decades by governments and magistrates marginalization of secularism .
2- The framework of the debate
From now on, the wearing of the religious veil in school activities is defended by the blackmail to the change of the law 1905.
The religious freedom which is not established by the 1905 law and which it merely remembers becomes a priority in the examination of this law in the face of the separation of religions and the state which is its own object, its invention .
It is considered that this law only concerned Catholicism while it concerned all religions; including Islam and Judaism.
a- In 1910, for reasons of slavery enslavement of the colonized masses, the colonial party obtained a waiver of application for Islam.
b- It is appropriate to recall that the continuity of the subjugation of the old colonized masses to Islam is the fact of colonialism. The evidence of faith is colonial.
7) - Conflicts in power
1- The two administrative policies
This double work of separating men and subjugating women is politically a continuous struggle to impose a corresponding administrative order that is contrary to the principles of freedom and equality created by Europe.
The issue of the continual practice of police "ambushes" by thugs is to obtain, in the exercise of public order in the so-called "neighborhoods". the recognition of a diplomatic distinction between representatives of French law and the masses subject to Islam with special representatives.
The police are at fault because they do not respect this diplomatic distance.
A rupture in the French law is built between the populations which fall under the ordinary right and those which come under a diplomatic practice of the same right.
2- Both languages
This political subversion is organized on the basis of religious questions, that is to say administrative, such as the "martyr" used by the academic Fassin, whereas the French, and beyond the Europeans, perceive the public debate only in political and legal terms that refer to the clash of civil society.
This explains the laborious work of religious translation towards the laity that the authorities are engaged in to make believe that there is a homogeneous dialogue.
3) - The place of confrontation
The meeting point of these two policies of organization of society is precisely Power.
Hence the permanent confrontations, multiform, inextricable.
8) - Accommodation
For reasons that are not part of this reflection, it seems that the authorities of the European states have chosen the solution of the division of power; accommodation.
It is this principle of accommodation and thus rupture of the continuity of the state that the magistrates implement, on October 25, 2019, during the ambush, at the Cité du Val-Fourré, in Mantes-la- Pretty one.
From now on, rioters of Muslim faith have legal prerogatives equal to those of the police.
Following the ambush of Val Fourré in Mantes-la-Jolie, the floor announces concomitantly, in the same legal quality:
1- That the IGPN is seized and that the investigations of this one will relate to the conditions of use of the police weapons of defense.
2- That he open an investigation of the leaders of violence in meetings with ambush and weapon as well as participation in a group formed for the commission of violence and outrages on person custodian of public authority.
3- The media announce first the seizure of the IGPN for the rioters and then the investigation for violence against the police.
a- When a rioter is injured, he claims the same medico-legal protection as the police and his case is also prioritized by the media.
b- Soon after the end of the clashes, two individuals presented themselves at the François Quesnay hospital center, claiming to have been wounded by LBD shots. One was touched at one eye, a second at the testicles.
c- A BST officer (Specialized Field Brigade) was injured by a mortar fire.
4- It is the convocation of the IGPN and thus the examination of a possible fault of the representatives of the Public authorities which is the priority of these two initiatives and which gives them their public sense.
9) - The standard
This emergence of a territorial and universal rupture of the continuity of the state becomes a legal norm.
1- At first, it is the legal power that holds the definition of legality. It is also he who voluntarily organizes the rupture of the continuity of the State in favor of two distinct functions of the law. He thinks he can handle them.
2- In a second time, it becomes possible that the unity of the two practices is managed by those same ones to which the first ones will have recognized an access to the legality.
The public now knows that it is not possible for the police to fight the thugs in all circumstances because they are already acting in the cracks of legality.
10- The avant-garde Corsica
The mafia is the action of private thugs in the field of public administration.
In Corsica, we are already at the second stage, where it is the mafia who organize the cohabitation of the two legal practices.
This ability of the mafia to take the direction of the administrative policy of Corsica has just been denounced by a group of honest citizens in the appeal of September 26, 2019.
They take "the initiative to invite the population to an awareness of the threats that seriously jeopardize the collective interests of our society and particularly those of our youth".
10) - The uncertainties of law
This discontinuity results in uncertainty of the law.
Whether in Corsica or in cities, magistrates and the media explain to the public that it is impossible to defeat the mafia because the law is with them.
1- It is no longer one-off cases but case law.
2- The only argument presented publicly to justify the inclusion in the law of a legal break is the fear of the capacities of the populations recognizing themselves in the factious ones to sow extraordinary disturbances with the public order.
National Muslim cadres have already publicly threatened the Civil War.
To act according to the fear inspired by particular masses is to negotiate.
In this case, the discussion aims to accommodate secularism with Sharia, Democracy with Fascism, Liberty with slave subversion.
11) - The trend
The power of the subversion enterprise of the Republic is marked on the one hand by the institutionalization of censorship and the judicial repression of opinions and on the other hand by the resurgence of the Vichyist doctrine of corporatism as a university political theory and as a practice of masses of social bodies.
Admittedly, nothing is acquired, everything is in negotiation, but the main thing for the factious is precisely that the legal authorities recognize them as "valid interlocutors" according to the historical formula to which all the parties think.
What makes the choice difficult for the authorities in their undeniable fight against terrorism is that the Islamists are the vanguard of the Muslim party and as such the vanguard of the Petainist party.
As for the leftists of May-68 and the 70s; there is a world and a beautiful world behind them.
As an indication, note that Denis Olivennes, ENA, Sciences Po, associate of letters, CEO of multinationals, member of the French-American Foundation-France, former leftist, Jewish executive, said during a recent broadcast of Zemmour and Naulleau, on the occasion of the release of his book "The delicious French misfortune" that "in 1945, France has committed a fault".
The action, the program, the government of the Liberation are at fault.
12) - Freedom
Proponents of this political doctrine are therefore led to fight freedom of opinion and expression.
The primary concern of their questioning is the erasure of the word freedom and its reality. They are constantly working to forget him.
But our society was founded by Freedom.
There can be no solution to anything that does not go through freedom and its variations; including freedom of opinion and expression.
Again, between De Gaulle and Pétain, the French must choose; and quick.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire