Marc Salomone / blog:
madic50 / Book: The two forms
Thursday 22 April 2021
THE RECOGNITION OF THE
DISCRIMINATION OF THE FRENCH IN THE ALLOCATION OF SOCIAL HOUSING
DURING PRESIDENT MACRON'S VISIT TO THE HLM OF MONTPELIER, April 19,
2021.
1) - The facts
On Monday, April 19,
2021, the President of the Republic visits a so-called sensitive
district of Montpellier.
He goes to a hall of a
HLM housing estate where the police have evacuated the dealers who
were
occupying it
militarily.
He opportunely crosses paths with a veiled woman who
complains to him about the lack of diversity. The term mixity and its
developments such as social mix means racial mix.
This is the language code
to say that populations under the control of Islam have become the
soleoccupants of places where the French are erased.
She studied in primary
school in the neighborhood. There was an ethnic mix of European
populations and diverse populations of Muslim background.
Islam merges with
specific and multiple ethnic groups by difference with the European
populations of original Christian culture and become secular.
Secular means that public
thought no longer derives its legitimacy from religious but civil
reflection.
Today, his eight-year-old
son asks him if the first name Pierre exists in real life or if it
only exists in books because he does not know any of his comrades who
have this first name.
This boy is gifted with
curiosity. At eight years old, he is already capable of transforming
what seems obvious to him into rational questioning.
We must therefore wait
for a filmed presidential visit and the declaration of a veiled
Muslim, activist, for it to be said that housing discrimination
against the French is a reality.
2) – History
It is indeed patent that
the French are excluded from the occupation of HLM housing; buildings
or pavilions (where most terrorists grew up).
1- Or, they leave on
their own to no longer suffer the multiple forms of militant Islamic
domination;
starting with its
association with pure criminality.
2- Either the housing
allocation bodies, prefectures, elected officials, donors, prioritize
allocating housing to migrant populations, that is to say Muslim
reference or expressly allied to this ideology; such as Christians
and African animists.
In both cases, we arrive
after a few years at the phenomenon that this lady describes, namely
the disappearance of European first names, that is to say from the
Christian calendar, in favor of the exclusivity of Muslim or African
first names.
3) - The privilege
The response of networks
of French executives to this demographic exclusivity is denial.
a- A militant Muslim
mother can complain about not seeing French and she is neither the
only one nor the first.
b- On the other hand, it
is out of the question for French executives, elected officials or
donors, to take into account the specificity of a French application
for housing. They even make it a point of honor.
d- It was also out of the
question for the President to meet a French woman, who complained of
not being able to "lead a peaceful life" in such and such a
city.
4) - The observation
Clearly, it is the
observation of an ethnic cleansing of these districts to the
detriment of the French.
The phenomena of ghettos
(Jews, Arab nationals, Amazigh, Turks, etc.) are complex realities
resulting from this movement of replacement of European populations
by populations of Muslim reference.
We verify it in
intramural Paris. As in Montpelier, Nice, Marseille, etc., Pierre is
obviously no longer present in a large number of primary schools. The
school path will follow automatically.
There is indeed a public
distinction between two types of populations.
a- The representatives of
the public authorities deny it.
b- The spokespersons of
the Muslim reference population require them to recognize this.
c- The representatives of
the public powers to answer publicly to all the French but agree to
answer in private to the questioning posed by the Muslims.
5) – Purification
This testimony shows that
the prevention of occupancy of housing leads to a cultural and
administrative eradication of first names.
But, it also leads to a
racial cleansing of the labor market.
The population of the
recruitment pool of companies is shifting.
The European salaried
population is replaced by Muslim populations or accepted by them.
With wage labor comes
capital. Corporate ownership is also shifting.
These mutations have
multiple factors linked to the same source:
a- Mechanical scarcity of
French applications.
b- Racialism of new
business owners.
c- Racial selection of
business installation loans on the pretext of helping the poorest.
d- Activation of public
executives who find it beneficial to promote, on the pretext of
diversity, a salaried population acquired by the privatization of
low-cost housing, public enterprises, and the liquidation of
secularism.
Here too, French
executives respond with the denial and lie of free and undistorted
competition.
6) – Vocabulary
The place of the French,
recognized by public vocabulary, including official ones, as working
classes is also changing.
They are not only tax
eliminated from city centers under gentrification and property
prices.
The language, even
official, takes note of their de facto disappearance, or of law when
they are still present, of the administrative and political names of
the metropolises.
Thus, the terms
“suburbs”, “neighborhoods”, “sensitive neighborhoods”,
“periphery”, “working-class neighborhoods”, “disadvantaged
neighborhoods”, etc. are they the synonyms of the exclusivity of
quotation of Arabs, Africans, Muslims.
This is why, when
President Macron goes to a “sensitive area”, he meets Muslims and
talks with a veiled woman. It goes without saying.
The “social”
vocabulary and its variations (social class, social segregation,
social mix, disadvantaged, poor, discriminated against, racialized,
etc.) have also become synonymous with ethnic groups, races, of
Muslim reference. The social is invested and subordinated by the
ethnic and the religious.
The vocabulary to
designate the French of the working classes is that of the exclusion
of metropolises, places of decision, action, economy, knowledge, etc.
The French live in
Rurality, Rural Territories,
They are excluded from
the social vocabulary. They are the "rural". They would
have said in the past, “helots”, “natives”.
From now on, in the
media, the French are commonly referred to by the term
"Franchouillards". It is the exact synonym of: bougnoule,
kid, nigga, slanted eyes, etc.
7) – Disqualification
There is also developing,
here and there, notably through the media, an openly racist discourse
as to the personal qualities of French people and migrants; for the
benefit of the latter.
In fact, in the
Metropolises, the decisive centers of France (economy, culture,
politics, State, etc.), the vocabulary serves the exclusivity of the
presence of Muslim reference populations and the demographic
disappearance, the public inexistence, social uselessness, of
European populations.
During the first
confinement for Covid 19, the employees who remained at work were
identified with migrants of Muslim descent. Not only because they now
occupy a large part of the executive staff in mainland France, but
first of all because they are the only ones to be recognized as
useful and that this recognition certifies the uselessness of the
French.
8) - provisional
illusions
The media, elected
officials, researchers, administrative executives, bosses, do not
recognize themselves in this distinction of two populations in
competition with one another.
This is so because they
still think that they have mastered this division and that it does
not concern the entire French population but only the popular
classes.
In fact, this distinction
between French and Muslims, Pierre and Mohamed, presented by this
lady only concerns workers and employees.
Academics and capitalists
have long thought they were not affected.
And all are happy to get
rid of the French workers and employees who made the heyday of
revolutionary protests.
Long live the
gentrification of cities! The inter-self! The legend of the Center
and the periphery.
In fact, the situation is
changing and academics and capitalists are feeling the wind of the
ball.
This is the reason for
the proliferation of books, studies, debates, on Islamism, so-called
delinquency in the suburbs, etc.
However, the authors must
imperatively keep Islamism at a distance without harming its function
of eliminating the French popular classes.
Huge program!
9) - Two examples
However, through two
completely distinct examples, the French in their mass have an idea
of the future of this logic of irresponsibility:
1- The Police-Gendarmerie
a- The police and
gendarmes believed for a long time that they could serve as an
adjunct to the racialization of gentrification, watch French workers
and employees flee into rural areas, dominate the migrant populations
seen as malleable.
b- From now on, they
commonly live 150km from their place of work, for safety reasons,
which makes them illegal.
c- Their action is
legally subordinated to the will of the thugs from the moment it is
embodied in the ideological filiation of this veiled woman.
d- Now they wonder where
the Power is; on their side or opposite, among Muslim reference
thugs?
e- Good luck to the
police and gendarmes indicted for rape and homicide!
2- The Jews
For a long time, networks
of Jewish university executives wanted to play the card of the social
unity of persecuted minorities.
In 2016, en masse, they
proposed to succeed in France which failed in Israel.
Today, documentaries tell
us that there is no longer a single Jew in the cities or
neighborhoods where they were installed.
The eradication of those
whom their thinkers present as "the vanguard of society" is
banally a part of that of the French.
3- Summary
This Muslim woman tells
the President that her eight-year-old son sees that there is no more
Peter. But, there are also no more Mila, David, cops, firefighters,
doctors, kindergartens, political parties, etc.
This is so because they
were driven out by the Muslims, purged of applications for housing by
the leading executives of the allocation of housing and public
security (the prefectures in particular), set on fire by the rebels
of the Mosque.
10) – Conclusion
Today, the French
executives have the authorization of this woman and of the President
of the Republic to take note in the composition of the HLM of the
absolute demographic imbalance between the populations which produce
Stone and those which produce Mohamed.
The denial of this fact
is therefore no longer possible.
It therefore becomes
possible to rely on the Elysee and the Mosque to allocate housing,
jobs, loans, specifically to French people.
And finally, life will
become peaceful again.
Marc SALOMONE
PS:
11) - An announcing fable
During a program devoted
to the prohibition or legalization of Cannabis, on the evening of
April 21, the Senator and Deputy Mayor of Marseille, Samia Ghali,
served a legend that was developed by journalists from the Parisian
press; in other words, Sciences-Po.
1- La Drogue brings
together the young people of the neighborhoods and the middle-class
people of the beautiful neighborhoods.
2- It is the bourgeois
who once brought drugs to the neighborhoods by forcing young people
to consume them.
3- As the young people of
the neighborhoods are intelligent, they have reversed the balance of
power and now it is the bourgeois who are served by the
neighborhoods.
4- In both cases, the
bourgeois exploit the young people of the neighborhoods.
5- It would be unfair for
legalization to allow bourgeois to no longer pay their reparation tax
to young people.
6- Legalization is
therefore a bad thing.
7- If it took place, the
cartels which direct the young people would spread terror.
You must read :
1- The Corsican maffia
has been supplanted by the Arab maffias.
2- Bourgeois is
synonymous with French and Young people or neighborhoods are
synonymous with Arabs, Africans, Muslims.
3- Consumers, French or
not, are subject to these maffias.
4- This racket and this
dictatorship must not stop.
5- The expansion of this
commercial dictatorship guarantees the institutional installation of
the executives of the community on an ethnico-religious basis.
Conclusion
1- This despicable,
scandalous, abject speech is common to the senator and to newspapers
such as Le Monde.
2- It is characteristic
of this manipulation of words to ensure the primacy of ethnic and
religious distinctions over civil and political distinctions.
3- It is now installed in
the aisles of Power.
12) - Charitable
purification
The racial cleansing of
the beneficiaries of the charity goes unnoticed or rather is
censored.
In Paris, in 20 years,
free municipal restaurants, association packages (Catholic relief,
resto-du-cœur, etc.), evening street meals, have become exclusively
racialist places to the detriment of the French.
The supply of customers
is ensured by social workers and local associations.
The purification is
already there and unsaid.
In March 2021, the
restaurant-du-cœur, which already had practically no more French
among its customers, judged that 1000 euros for a family of two was a
sign of wealth and therefore exclusion.
Under the convenience of
managing poverty, the last and extremely rare French people are being
purified.
In the Salvation Army,
the evening soup is placed under the authority of Arab and African
guards.
Their intrinsic racism is
covered by the management and the public prosecutor.
