Marc Salomone / blog: madic50 / Book: The two forms
Thursday 22 April 2021
THE RECOGNITION OF THE DISCRIMINATION OF THE FRENCH IN THE ALLOCATION OF SOCIAL HOUSING DURING PRESIDENT MACRON'S VISIT TO THE HLM OF MONTPELIER, April 19, 2021.
1) - The facts
On Monday, April 19, 2021, the President of the Republic visits a so-called sensitive district of Montpellier.
He goes to a hall of a HLM housing estate where the police have evacuated the dealers who were
occupying it
militarily.
He opportunely crosses paths with a veiled woman who
complains to him about the lack of diversity. The term mixity and its
developments such as social mix means racial mix.
This is the language code to say that populations under the control of Islam have become the soleoccupants of places where the French are erased.
She studied in primary school in the neighborhood. There was an ethnic mix of European populations and diverse populations of Muslim background.
Islam merges with specific and multiple ethnic groups by difference with the European populations of original Christian culture and become secular.
Secular means that public thought no longer derives its legitimacy from religious but civil reflection.
Today, his eight-year-old son asks him if the first name Pierre exists in real life or if it only exists in books because he does not know any of his comrades who have this first name.
This boy is gifted with curiosity. At eight years old, he is already capable of transforming what seems obvious to him into rational questioning.
We must therefore wait for a filmed presidential visit and the declaration of a veiled Muslim, activist, for it to be said that housing discrimination against the French is a reality.
2) – History
It is indeed patent that the French are excluded from the occupation of HLM housing; buildings or pavilions (where most terrorists grew up).
1- Or, they leave on their own to no longer suffer the multiple forms of militant Islamic domination;
starting with its association with pure criminality.
2- Either the housing allocation bodies, prefectures, elected officials, donors, prioritize allocating housing to migrant populations, that is to say Muslim reference or expressly allied to this ideology; such as Christians and African animists.
In both cases, we arrive after a few years at the phenomenon that this lady describes, namely the disappearance of European first names, that is to say from the Christian calendar, in favor of the exclusivity of Muslim or African first names.
3) - The privilege
The response of networks of French executives to this demographic exclusivity is denial.
a- A militant Muslim mother can complain about not seeing French and she is neither the only one nor the first.
b- On the other hand, it is out of the question for French executives, elected officials or donors, to take into account the specificity of a French application for housing. They even make it a point of honor.
d- It was also out of the question for the President to meet a French woman, who complained of not being able to "lead a peaceful life" in such and such a city.
4) - The observation
Clearly, it is the observation of an ethnic cleansing of these districts to the detriment of the French.
The phenomena of ghettos (Jews, Arab nationals, Amazigh, Turks, etc.) are complex realities resulting from this movement of replacement of European populations by populations of Muslim reference.
We verify it in intramural Paris. As in Montpelier, Nice, Marseille, etc., Pierre is obviously no longer present in a large number of primary schools. The school path will follow automatically.
There is indeed a public distinction between two types of populations.
a- The representatives of the public authorities deny it.
b- The spokespersons of the Muslim reference population require them to recognize this.
c- The representatives of the public powers to answer publicly to all the French but agree to answer in private to the questioning posed by the Muslims.
5) – Purification
This testimony shows that the prevention of occupancy of housing leads to a cultural and administrative eradication of first names.
But, it also leads to a racial cleansing of the labor market.
The population of the recruitment pool of companies is shifting.
The European salaried population is replaced by Muslim populations or accepted by them.
With wage labor comes capital. Corporate ownership is also shifting.
These mutations have multiple factors linked to the same source:
a- Mechanical scarcity of French applications.
b- Racialism of new business owners.
c- Racial selection of business installation loans on the pretext of helping the poorest.
d- Activation of public executives who find it beneficial to promote, on the pretext of diversity, a salaried population acquired by the privatization of low-cost housing, public enterprises, and the liquidation of secularism.
Here too, French executives respond with the denial and lie of free and undistorted competition.
6) – Vocabulary
The place of the French, recognized by public vocabulary, including official ones, as working classes is also changing.
They are not only tax eliminated from city centers under gentrification and property prices.
The language, even official, takes note of their de facto disappearance, or of law when they are still present, of the administrative and political names of the metropolises.
Thus, the terms “suburbs”, “neighborhoods”, “sensitive neighborhoods”, “periphery”, “working-class neighborhoods”, “disadvantaged neighborhoods”, etc. are they the synonyms of the exclusivity of quotation of Arabs, Africans, Muslims.
This is why, when President Macron goes to a “sensitive area”, he meets Muslims and talks with a veiled woman. It goes without saying.
The “social” vocabulary and its variations (social class, social segregation, social mix, disadvantaged, poor, discriminated against, racialized, etc.) have also become synonymous with ethnic groups, races, of Muslim reference. The social is invested and subordinated by the ethnic and the religious.
The vocabulary to designate the French of the working classes is that of the exclusion of metropolises, places of decision, action, economy, knowledge, etc.
The French live in Rurality, Rural Territories,
They are excluded from the social vocabulary. They are the "rural". They would have said in the past, “helots”, “natives”.
From now on, in the media, the French are commonly referred to by the term "Franchouillards". It is the exact synonym of: bougnoule, kid, nigga, slanted eyes, etc.
7) – Disqualification
There is also developing, here and there, notably through the media, an openly racist discourse as to the personal qualities of French people and migrants; for the benefit of the latter.
In fact, in the Metropolises, the decisive centers of France (economy, culture, politics, State, etc.), the vocabulary serves the exclusivity of the presence of Muslim reference populations and the demographic disappearance, the public inexistence, social uselessness, of European populations.
During the first confinement for Covid 19, the employees who remained at work were identified with migrants of Muslim descent. Not only because they now occupy a large part of the executive staff in mainland France, but first of all because they are the only ones to be recognized as useful and that this recognition certifies the uselessness of the French.
8) - provisional illusions
The media, elected officials, researchers, administrative executives, bosses, do not recognize themselves in this distinction of two populations in competition with one another.
This is so because they still think that they have mastered this division and that it does not concern the entire French population but only the popular classes.
In fact, this distinction between French and Muslims, Pierre and Mohamed, presented by this lady only concerns workers and employees.
Academics and capitalists have long thought they were not affected.
And all are happy to get rid of the French workers and employees who made the heyday of revolutionary protests.
Long live the gentrification of cities! The inter-self! The legend of the Center and the periphery.
In fact, the situation is changing and academics and capitalists are feeling the wind of the ball.
This is the reason for the proliferation of books, studies, debates, on Islamism, so-called delinquency in the suburbs, etc.
However, the authors must imperatively keep Islamism at a distance without harming its function of eliminating the French popular classes.
Huge program!
9) - Two examples
However, through two completely distinct examples, the French in their mass have an idea of the future of this logic of irresponsibility:
1- The Police-Gendarmerie
a- The police and gendarmes believed for a long time that they could serve as an adjunct to the racialization of gentrification, watch French workers and employees flee into rural areas, dominate the migrant populations seen as malleable.
b- From now on, they commonly live 150km from their place of work, for safety reasons, which makes them illegal.
c- Their action is legally subordinated to the will of the thugs from the moment it is embodied in the ideological filiation of this veiled woman.
d- Now they wonder where the Power is; on their side or opposite, among Muslim reference thugs?
e- Good luck to the police and gendarmes indicted for rape and homicide!
2- The Jews
For a long time, networks of Jewish university executives wanted to play the card of the social unity of persecuted minorities.
In 2016, en masse, they proposed to succeed in France which failed in Israel.
Today, documentaries tell us that there is no longer a single Jew in the cities or neighborhoods where they were installed.
The eradication of those whom their thinkers present as "the vanguard of society" is banally a part of that of the French.
3- Summary
This Muslim woman tells the President that her eight-year-old son sees that there is no more Peter. But, there are also no more Mila, David, cops, firefighters, doctors, kindergartens, political parties, etc.
This is so because they were driven out by the Muslims, purged of applications for housing by the leading executives of the allocation of housing and public security (the prefectures in particular), set on fire by the rebels of the Mosque.
10) – Conclusion
Today, the French executives have the authorization of this woman and of the President of the Republic to take note in the composition of the HLM of the absolute demographic imbalance between the populations which produce Stone and those which produce Mohamed.
The denial of this fact is therefore no longer possible.
It therefore becomes possible to rely on the Elysee and the Mosque to allocate housing, jobs, loans, specifically to French people.
And finally, life will become peaceful again.
Marc SALOMONE
PS:
11) - An announcing fable
During a program devoted to the prohibition or legalization of Cannabis, on the evening of April 21, the Senator and Deputy Mayor of Marseille, Samia Ghali, served a legend that was developed by journalists from the Parisian press; in other words, Sciences-Po.
1- La Drogue brings together the young people of the neighborhoods and the middle-class people of the beautiful neighborhoods.
2- It is the bourgeois who once brought drugs to the neighborhoods by forcing young people to consume them.
3- As the young people of the neighborhoods are intelligent, they have reversed the balance of power and now it is the bourgeois who are served by the neighborhoods.
4- In both cases, the bourgeois exploit the young people of the neighborhoods.
5- It would be unfair for legalization to allow bourgeois to no longer pay their reparation tax to young people.
6- Legalization is therefore a bad thing.
7- If it took place, the cartels which direct the young people would spread terror.
You must read :
1- The Corsican maffia has been supplanted by the Arab maffias.
2- Bourgeois is synonymous with French and Young people or neighborhoods are synonymous with Arabs, Africans, Muslims.
3- Consumers, French or not, are subject to these maffias.
4- This racket and this dictatorship must not stop.
5- The expansion of this commercial dictatorship guarantees the institutional installation of the executives of the community on an ethnico-religious basis.
Conclusion
1- This despicable, scandalous, abject speech is common to the senator and to newspapers such as Le Monde.
2- It is characteristic of this manipulation of words to ensure the primacy of ethnic and religious distinctions over civil and political distinctions.
3- It is now installed in the aisles of Power.
12) - Charitable purification
The racial cleansing of the beneficiaries of the charity goes unnoticed or rather is censored.
In Paris, in 20 years, free municipal restaurants, association packages (Catholic relief, resto-du-cœur, etc.), evening street meals, have become exclusively racialist places to the detriment of the French.
The supply of customers is ensured by social workers and local associations.
The purification is already there and unsaid.
In March 2021, the restaurant-du-cœur, which already had practically no more French among its customers, judged that 1000 euros for a family of two was a sign of wealth and therefore exclusion.
Under the convenience of managing poverty, the last and extremely rare French people are being purified.
In the Salvation Army, the evening soup is placed under the authority of Arab and African guards.
Their intrinsic racism is covered by the management and the public prosecutor.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire