Blog:
madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The two forms, ed. Amazon.
Paris,
Sunday, November 11, 2018
REFLECTION
ON THE TWO LOGIC OF PRODUCTION OF THE PARITY OF BOTH SEXES
Part1:
The glass ceiling
1.
Preamble
We can
not do everything with ignorance and good will.
The
"glass ceiling" which illustrates the current inability to
realize the equal presence of both sexes in the direction and the
social functioning is also built of the misunderstanding of the place
of the two sexes in the functioning of the society.
This
"ceiling" therefore also proceeds from ignorance that makes
one blind. Knowledge is the bedrock of victorious efficiency.
This is
why this text is devoted to the understanding of the social and
political function of the two sexes and their relationship to the
Power.
2) - The
National Assembly
On
September 12, 2018, on the occasion of the election of the President
of the National Assembly, known as the "perch", the macho
party inflicted a spectacular derangement on women and the parity of
democracy.
During
his inauguration speech President Ferrand will take note of the
archaism of this election with these words: "I am perfectly
aware that my election is more the result of political realities than
the outcome of a talent competition. ".
This
regression towards the conservatism of which the French cadres are
accustomed does not contradict President Ferrant's remarks on the
legality of his election. Each gender held its place and remained
there.
1- Men
Certainly
the victory of Mr. Ferrand is a victory of machismo. But, the men
have won because they are known, by culture, to define the political
character of this battle.
In this
election, the monopoly of the candidacy by a politically homogeneous
party eliminates the primacy of the stakes of political lines.
The fight
between the candidates was to reserve the place of investiture to men
instead of registering the position of power in the parity evolution
of society.
To do
this, the macho network of this party did not hesitate to use the old
world methods by using powers of the internal administration of the
party to eliminate a candidate and morally impress his sisters and
their potential voters.
The
machists fought a battle for the exercise of power. They called on
the constituents of the parliamentary group to renew the dominant
networks of power formation.
2- Women
The women
candidates lost first because they did not behave in politics, as
fighters, on the ground imposed by the circumstances, namely a
competition between the two sexes for the exercise of power.
They have
remained in the field of accommodation between colleagues and have,
as usual, subordinated to the good will of men when it comes to
power.
They
locked themselves into the corporatist circle which was imposed upon
them while they wanted to break with the macho evidences of its
functioning.
They
wanted a discontinuity by staying within the same corporatist unit
that rejects this break.
They thus
condemned themselves to mask the confrontation of the sexes which was
the only real stake of this debate of nomination of the single de
facto candidate to the Perchoir.
To say
the same thing that everyone men are much better settled in the
evidence of the vote.
Instead,
they had to appeal to the people, that is to say to the National
Assembly and the citizens who would have followed the debates.
President
Ferrand recognized the political legitimacy of this approach by
opposing the "majority political realities" and the "talent
competition".
It is the
privilege of the dominant to recognize that they are wrong and that
they are just the winners of one of these fights whose victory is the
only issue.
Women's
access to Perchoir would not have changed its line with men since
they claim to be similar to that of the President.
However,
a President has shown that women have gained access to this title by
mastering political battles. It would have been a lever for mass
parity.
The
precedent of such mastery of the power issue is Angela Merkel. Her
education by the German Democratic Republic has allowed her to
understand that she can compete in the Chancellery.
On the
other hand, the women of the Federal Republic of Germany assigned to
the three Ks (kitchen, children, church) are still not able to meet
this challenge.
4- Batho
MP
MP Batho
draws the conclusions of this defeat by stating: "Women must
take power and no longer accept their exclusion. "
This is
an indication that this is not the case today and it could be good
news.
However,
his conquest of power is based on the call to women to be "in
solidarity with one another", and therefore to get out of the
stakes of power. It is still not out of feminine unionism and its
corporatist limits to enter politics and the universal.
Part 2:
The function of both sexes
For women
to "take power" and cease to be excluded, the place of both
sexes in the functioning of power must be understood.
There are
two forms of organization of society.
1- The
economic form
The class
struggle forms the social and economic system and ultimately
determines all political issues.
a- The
economic form produces class conflicts and their political
expression. In 1789, between feudalism and the bourgeoisie.
b- That
is why the exercise of the Power, of the Powers, can do without the
presence of the women, even even to forbid them the access. The Duck
continues to run.
It is the
world of great human masses.
2- The
administrative form
The
distribution of the two sexes is the concrete, human matter of the
administrative form of the exercise of these social and economic
functions.
It is
therefore the frame, the physiology, the administrative modalities of
exercise of the policy.
It is the
world of the individual of society, of individuality and totality;
that of the 1 and 0 of computer science or 1 and 2 of social
security; that of the redistribution to infinity of the "individuals"
of the "totality" of the two sexes.
The
administrative form produces the perimeter of social inclusion of the
Power: Who is part of democracy or dictatorship, nationality and
foreign?
The
determination of the enlargement of the masses included in the
exercise of the Power depends on the balance of forces in the
economic form and thus on the organization of the Politics.
3- The
links between the two reference systems can be compared to the double
helix of the DNA.
5) - The
visibility of these two forms
Switching
from one mode of production to another transforms the administrative
reports
a- Before
89, the officials, subordinated to the feudal economic form,
therefore to the person of the King and the Lords and their civilian
counterparts, had to devote all their energy to the financing of the
feudal and royal lifestyle.
The road
network was just as bad in the 18th century as it was in the 15th
century.b- After 89, the same people were distributed in the public
administration generated by the public administrative form
subordinate to capitalism.
The same
officials as under the old regime, at first, could devote their
energy to the Nation.
The 19th
century, particularly brutal in its clashes of classes, organized the
entire road network, railway, postal, school, administrative, sewer,
lighting, etc.
6) - Both
votes
The
passage from the feudal administration to the public administration
provoked a duality in the administrative functioning.
Only the
passage of the suffrage by universal suffrage allowed the universal
access to the whole with the sewer and after 1945 with the
electricity.
7) - The
constitution of the suffrage
1- The
census suffrage
The
census suffrage seems to be the direct expression of the dictatorship
of a ruling class.
a- The
suffrage censitaire is based on the payment of the tax which is an
economic data par excellence.
With
universal suffrage is born the universal tax. Even today university
networks claim that the poorest pay a tax to justify their right to
vote.
b- The
census suffrage eliminates:
An
important part of the dominant classes, the middle classes, are
indispensable to the proper functioning of domination.
bb- The
dominated classes, workers, peasants, artisans, administrative labor.
c- The
census suffrage always eliminates women.
2-
Universal suffrage
Universal
suffrage begins with the exclusion of women.
In 1848,
universal suffrage is proclaimed. It only concerns males and more
importantly metropolitan or colonial males.
The
history of national suffrage is at once the construction of political
citizenship and the recognition of the involvement of both
administrative genders in its composition. Universality implies the
inclusion of women.
3-
Suffrage and the economy
Class
relations determine the passage from one suffrage to another; with
sometimes subtle possibilities of round trip.
However,
the mode of suffrage only very imperfectly matches the balance of
power between classes, social groupings, social categories.
The
addition of social classes forms only an appearance of universality.
This is
true as well:
a- In
Europe with census or universal suffrage when reserved for men.
b- In the
southern countries where universal suffrage is the hiding place of
the feudal dictatorship in different forms. cf. the following.
4- The
element of suffrage
Universal
suffrage reveals that it is not class relations that first determine
universality.
A common
element in the functioning of both votes indicates that there is
another reality included in the functioning of the voting modes.
Suffrage
is immediately subordinated to the expression of the relations
between the two sexes.
It is
through the exercise of this administrative function that the
suffrage allows the political intervention otherwise economic.
Voters
are administrators, civil servants. Voters are citizens, politicians.
The
function of suffrage is first of all the politicization of the
administrative form. As such, he defines the social basin of power.
To what perimeter of population will the public administration extend
its inclusive action? With what populations do they work and which
populations are they subject to?
To the
extent that they want to use elections to change the economic and
social system, social revolutionaries have always looked at the
elections with caution.
These do
not directly answer the questions posed by the conflicts produced by
the economy. They do it only by the detour of the circuits of the
administrative form.
5-
Elections and politics
To the
extent that social policies understand this functioning of the
suffrage, they can obtain not the revolutionary change of ruling
classes but the consolidation of the classes that they represent in
the social basin of the Power.
This is
the case of the Popular Front and the Liberation.
This is
what enables them to intervene in the economic order and to
participate, in fact or in law, in the exercise of power.
It is singular that in France, the suffrage of all
the major inhabitants, the one that associates in law and equality
the two sexes, goes hand in hand with the accession to the right to
vote of the old natives but also with the Social Security. It took
the political upheaval of the Second World War and the victory of
Democracy over fascism.
The reality of suffrage (now always proclaimed universal) and administrative boundaries (now always total) are subject to fluctuations.
8) - The
brutal intrusion of the economy
According
to the verse of Aragon: From time to time the earth trembles.
Revolutions,
coups de force, wars, treaties, etc., tear the administrative veil in
place to rewire another.
Revolutions
far from rejecting legality are on the contrary a work on the
legality to bring about a new economic mode.
But in
these cases, it is always possible to notice that this new
administration corresponds to modifications of the relations of the
two sexes and to note which ones.
A return
to more domination and exclusion of one sex by another is necessarily
a step backwards from Democracy.
Part 3:
Parity
9) –
Preamble
1- The reason
The
debate on parity is born from the observation that the formalism of
universal suffrage leaves the organization of the public authorities
to the administrative policy based on the domination of one sex on
the other.
Humanity
finds itself facing global challenges with an administration whose
functioning is based at best on the good will of one sex towards the
other.
We do not
mobilize the world population by peeping an eye.
2- The
global necessity
A- The
North
In the
North, universal suffrage may have seemed to impose itself on social
classes and their conflicts. In this case, the parity of the sexes
seems to come as a finish of this emancipation and this universalist
contribution.
This is
so because the administrations of these countries are already
universalist. They are composed of individuals and societies since
Luther in the 15th century.
The
religious world has been destroyed and the emancipation of the
administrations towards the classes is confused with the emancipation
of the people.
Nonetheless,
gender equality based on the goodwill of one sex with respect to the
rights of the other is beyond its limits and is manifestly attained.
Regression
is the observation of all analysts.
B- The
South
This is
not the case in the South.
Archaic
administrations have been almost entirely preserved by colonial
globalization. They have just been asked to accept the necessary
public administration of Capital.
They have
seen the development of capitalism as an unequal mode of production
among others and behave as providers of docile labor.
Universal
suffrage is a façade concession. It preserves back the dictatorship
of archaic administrative forms, slavery, based on the subjugation of
women as administrative, social, of all social servitudes.
These are
ways of feudal or colonial religious administrations.
In this
context, parity is not the continuation of a movement of emancipation
but the condition of its beginning.
It is the
parity that will break the monolithic and especially religious
administrative form and allow the realistic expression of the
modernities of the economic system.
France is
constitutionally parity since the 1999 reform.
It is
therefore possible to examine its operation and achievements, and to
make proposals so that, finally, according to the proposal of MP
Batho: Women take power and no longer accept to be excluded.
We
realize that parity is organized according to two ways that are
identifiable to the two paths of suffrage: the censitaire and the
universal.
These two
parity channels are competitive parity (censitaire) and parity of law
(universal).
11) -
Competitive parity
Having
embarked on a competitive parity with Prime Minister Jospin since the
1999 reform, we are condemned to run after all the injustices made to
women, one after the other, and the negative social consequences of
dominations between the sexes.
This
reform founded parity on a subjective or competitive right between
the sexes to form and express their formal equality.
a-
Competitive parity makes special arrangements so that parity results
from the meeting of individuals of both sexes with personal, social,
administrative and equal capacities.
b- This
parity is necessarily partial and precarious.
c- She is
a shameful parity and enfeebles degrading qualifiers such as
"quotas".
It drowns
in an identification with all the differences, those of the varieties
of the same quality: sexual, racial, cultural, etc.
Pressed
to obtain results which it does not want but which it authorizes,
this parity is condemned to multiply the police buttresses to force
to the success a logic voted otherwise to fail at least to succeed as
late as possible.
The facts
show that it does not work.
It is the
very principle of competitive law that subordinates the relations of
the sexes to the relations of domination defined by the economy.
These are now favorable to the holders of capital and unfavorable to
the employees therefore to the dominant more than ever defined
against the dominated.
Indeed,
this logic leaves, in all the doctrines, of right as of left, a
guiding place to the sexual transfiguration of the domination which
is the machismo.
It can
only result in this political regression that voluntarism said
political and personal reality. Whether people are moral or physical.
Now, the
miracle of individualist emancipation is to reproduce to infinity the
dominant logics.
This
logic of Sisyphus feeds the martyrdom of the combatants. As soon as
their goal is achieved, it disintegrates before their eyes.
All the
feminist interventions most knowledgeable of the issue report that
women's rights are falling behind the outside of their accession to
various positions of CEO.
Remaining
to be mobilized for abortion, battered women, the image of women's
place for girls, equality in municipal offices, places of government
and administrative leadership, France, Europe, etc. .
It is the
popular, civil expression of the fussy democracy that competitive
laissez-faire requires if it is to not lead directly to the outright
elimination of women who do not belong to the ruling classes.
But the
Democrats will never run as fast as the reactionary and religious
wave that submerges the world; including the European Union.
The most
ideologically archaic circles constantly hear that the presence of
women in the regular operation of the "Powers" is a
permanent conquest, uncertain, difficult, always challenged, prone to
retreats, made for the elite.
How can
it be surprising that the most obscurantist ideological and religious
regressions develop there as alternative solutions?
12) - The
reasons for success
The
success of competitive parity comes from its social consequences. It
preserves the circuits of existing dominations by including women who
share the principles.
Its
female curators want a parity that certainly allows women to form a
communitarian totality but only for the benefit of the women of the
ruling classes and the servants of authority.
Women in the dominated classes are excluded in
advance from the benefits of participation in power and its
consequences. They will never be competent enough.
In fact,
under the outside of radicalism, many feminists develop a logic of
the same model as the suffrage censitaire or, according to the
current term, elitist.
13) -
Parity of right
To move
to the universalist logic, parliamentarians have the window of the
constitutional reform wanted by President Macron.
Democrats
could on this occasion impose the parity of right.
Legal
parity places gender parity in the regular functioning of
institutions and public authorities.
It is no
longer an option, a will, a policy. It is an administrative routine
for the formation of deliberative assemblies, administrative
directorates, colleges of decisions such as juries, etc.
The Mayor
can dismiss the assistant from the municipal office who is too keen
on his taste. She will be replaced by another woman and he will
eventually calm down.
We often
take the example of little girls who lose their professional
ambitions when they look up to the machismo of the competition
juries.
When they
find it obvious that the municipal councils, the offices, but also
the mayors of the department or the region, are parity, when they
know that the juries are parity, they will find it obvious to prepare
for their career.
This can
extend to the formation of all organizations delegated a public
service mission or benefiting from a well-known support of the public
finances.
The
Norwegians have already reportedly said that "boards of
directors" must be parity or aim to be.
14) -
Universal parity
Parity of
right is an extension of the logic of universal suffrage.
Women are
not present in the functioning of institutions because they are
better or the same as men, but because they are women; the other half
of humanity.
We pass
from the census logic of the chosen voters to the universalist logic
of the required voters on the sole criterion of belonging to the
human totality.
15) - the
two representations
This
question is similar to those posed over the centuries by
representation.
Who
should represent the people in their most diverse names?
It seems
obvious to us today that it is humans who represent humans and direct
society.
It has
not always been the case and it is not even the case everywhere.
16) - The
archaic representation
Gods,
abstract or animal, or natural, directed the ancient states.
Kings and
Lords with Gods.
Priests
intercessors with the Gods,
We must
wait for the foundation of secularism by Luther and the developments
of it so that societies admit that only men are competent in this
respect.
This
passage from extra-human representation to exclusively human
representation has required the affirmation in principle that humans
have by nature in them all the skills required to do so.
Not so
long ago, in France, universal suffrage was fought for the inability
of men to govern, to teach, to cure, etc., without God.
The
ideology of human inability to govern alone is still present in the
European Union.
Recently,
in a debate on France info, the filmmaker Jean-Claude Carrière
declared that the secular school is not enough to give morality to
children and that it is responsible for abuses of school and other
violence.
It was
not contradicted.
In the
United States, although the state is perfectly secular, that is to
say that churches are separated from the state, the President has the
coquetry to swear an oath on the Bible as well as the parties during
a trial .
How can a
man who is incapable of speaking the truth, of understanding and
respecting the Constitution himself, be able to do these things by
the detour of a God because he does not even understand the meaning
of them? ?
The same is true in Russia, which has a perfectly
secular Constitution but whose government finds it clever to impose
the war of religious archaisms.
These
feats are nothing more than a dangerous, even criminal, quackery.
17) - The
democratic representation
Parity of
law, like universal suffrage, is based on the logic of the
exclusiveness of human representation in all dimensions of the
direction of society.
Men are
not first in command positions because they are the best but because
there are positions.
These
positions are the men who created them. They therefore know the
questions and are empowered to provide answers.
18) -
Suspicions and segregation
The move
to parity is accompanied by the same questioning of women's
abilities.
This
questioning is taken up by competitive parity.
This
logic echoes this suspicion of a possible incompetence of women that
priests developed towards men and that the enemies of Democracy
constantly put on the agenda to disqualify Democracy and especially
parliamentary representation.
This
detour by suspicion makes it possible to construct and justify a
distinction between the so-called elite women, those who can, and the
common women who justify the suspicions weighing on women. In short,
to sort. This is the census principle.
Nevertheless,
this elitist logic, even segregationist, technically reinforces the
finding that today the suspicion of incapacity of women for
leadership positions is unfounded.
It
follows that the main function of the census parity is to prevent the
transition to a logic of universal suffrage, that is, parity of
right. It is an archaic tenacious diversion.
19) - The
age-old ritual of obstruction
The
constitutional reform of Mr Jospin and the arrangements for
installing parity are typical of this logic.
In 1999,
Parliament reinstated the parity route it imposed on women from 1880
to 1944 to justify their accession to formal equality and the right
to vote.
As women
are potentially incapable but can be competent, they must be given
the opportunity to gradually integrate the responsibilities that the
Males already exert from the outset.
These
speeches want to make us forget that men do not occupy the place
first of all according to their competence but first of all because
it exists and that a human is needed.
This
progressivity backwards is the specificity of French executives for a
century. The vote is distinguished from the eligibility, the degrees
of election are as many ranks to be crossed to access the grail of
the male vote; One day.
This
intellectual approach allowed France to be one of the last
democracies to recognize women's right to vote.
20) - The
democratic invention
This
obstruction of access to universal suffrage and constitutional
equality was lifted in 1944 by the National Council of Resistance.
The
conflict between the two orientations, censitaire or universalist,
competitive or of right, took place on March 24, 1944 in Algiers to
the provisional Consultative Assembly, opened on November 3, 1943.
During
this session, Fernand Grenier, Communist, is Air Minister of the
Provisional Governor appointed by General de Gaulle in Algiers, April
4, 1944.
In 1959
he published "It was so ... (memories)". ed. Social.
"It
was also this House which, during the discussion on the
reestablishment of public authorities at liberation, decided to grant
women the right to vote.
A draft
of the Provisional Government admitted the vote of the French for the
National Assembly but rejected it for the municipal and cantonal
elections.
A
Commission of the Consultative Assembly, presided over by the radical
Senator Giaccobi, further aggravated this already timid project,
leaving no more than the right of the woman to be elected without
being herself a constituent!
My
comrades charged me to defend an amendment which put an end to all
these subtleties.
It read
as follows:
"Women
will be voters and eligible under the same conditions as men".
it was
clear and clean.
After a
courteous but passionate discussion, the communist amendment was
voted by 51 to 16 out of 67 voters.
It is
from this meeting of March 24, 1944 that date actually the vote of
women of France. "
The
passage from the census logic that paralyzed the French Parliament
during the interwar period to a universalist logic is obvious here.
General
De Gaulle, President of the Government of Liberation was able to
transcribe without discussion this text into law. Could his
successors be able?
21) - The
militant regression
The
French cadres gave ground in the heat of the democratic action of the
Liberation. However, they did not abandon their census logic of
selection of women and their constitutional capacities.
This
logic seems consubstantial with the thought of the French cadres
because it is in their formation the inscription of their role of
guardian of the defeat of the French Revolution. The only "never
again" that they have ever joined.
In 1999,
the reform Jospin is the return to the logic of census, elitist. Down
with Liberation! Long live the rooms that can not be found.
Parity in
the deliberative assemblies is acquired by the filter of the
electoral action of the parties. These "favor" parity and
therefore delay it as long as they want.
Consequently,
given the equality of the elected representatives within the
Assemblies, parity can not be the distribution logic of the elect in
the internal dispositions.
The
novelty is that the communal level this time is designated as the
place of experimentation parity and the test of women in their
leadership abilities.
Women
will have real parity in deliberative assemblies if these, by the EU
and the market, are no longer used for nothing.
Parity
must be placed within Assemblies and Public Authorities.
It
imposes itself then on all the modalities of organizations of these.
In this
case, the political parties, constitutional bodies, are no longer the
delegates of the parity of the Assemblies but they include it in
their own womb. This is certainly more modest but more effective.
23) –
Proposals
President
Macron is organizing a reform of the Constitution. It is a fact.
It may be
appropriate for women and all democrats who support parity to propose
the necessary reforms to install parity of right and to remove it
from the subjectivity of the framework of circumstances.
The
additions to the 1999 reform for Sovereignty and political parties
are:
Art. 1,
paragraph 2: "The law promotes the equal access of women and men
to electoral mandates and elective functions, as well as to
professional and social responsibilities. "
Art. 4,
paragraph 2: "They contribute to the implementation of the
principle set out in the second paragraph of Article 1 under the
conditions determined by law. "
I propose
the deletion of these articles constituting subjective or competitive
parity.
They are
replaced by two modifications of Art.1, paragraph 1 and the addition
of a paragraph 5 to Art. 3
Art. 1,
paragraph 1:
"France
is an indivisible, secular, democratic and social republic.
It
ensures equality before the law of all citizens without distinction
of origin, race or religion.
Members
have already voted:
"It
ensures the equality before the law of all citizens without
distinction of origin, religion or sex. "
NB: In
July 2018, adding the indistinction of the sexes, the deputies voted
the suppression of "without distinction of race". This
necessarily leads to the organization of parties and then to public
authorities based on the constitutionality of the distinction of
races.
This
suppression of "the indistinction of the races" (under the
pressure of communitarian lobbies and the American state) necessarily
entails the suppression of the "indivisibility" of the
Republic and the principle of "continuity" of the State.
The
demand for the suppression of these principles is already the subject
of books by ideologues of religious communitarianism.
It will
only be left to the factious to make the unconstitutionality of these
principles recognized by the Constitutional Council. Which should not
be too difficult.
It seems
that the addition of the indistinctness of the "sexes" is
the screen of the tribalisation of the Assemblies and the Public
Authorities.
Art. 3:
Addition
of paragraph 5: "The public authorities, the deliberative
assemblies, are constituted by the joint, equal, universal, de jure
presence of both sexes. "
This
proposed wording ensures parity of rights. Both sexes will then be
equally and legally present wherever public decisions are made.
24) - The
cancellation of women
1- The
subjectivity of the Jospin reform subjects women to the goodwill of
men to recognize their value.
a- On
August 30, 2016, the Superior Council of Magistracy (CSM) was to
provide for the replacement of ten Attorneys General.
b- The
CSM found that none of the candidates was fit to perform this
function.
2- All
the systems of dominations, so open they always seem to remind on the
occasion that they are
based on
principles of domination and not of equality.
25) -
Parity and Politics
The joint
presence of both sexes does not give a particular political line.
The
latter is the result of political struggles that are ultimately the
concerns of social classes.
Unlike
competitive parity, parity of law does not assign women to any
qualification whatsoever. Only the sexual characteristic is a
determinant of equal and legal presence in administrative networks.
It is
therefore a guarantee of the personal freedom of women. As access to
elections has been a guarantee of the personal freedom of men.
On the
other hand, parity imposes on the policies to govern by including the
two sexes which are an administrative figure of the totality of the
population in its software of positive actions.
Politicians
would like to transpose the modes of democratic organizations of the
past into supranational bodies, such as the European Union or the
sketches of global governance.
1- Europe
After the
illusions of societies led by the blind action of competition, the
Europeans must be well aware of the paramount importance of the
administrative form.
Transposed
to the European scale it is multiplied.
The
universalist formalism is more and more the mask of machismo
regressions.
I do not
develop here, but it is clear that one of the reasons for the support
of certain networks of senior executives to migration is the desire
to use these archaic cultures, without the knowledge of these
populations, to smash the mouths of women, to girls, and beyond to
secularism and political democracy.
2- the
World
On a
global scale, the emancipation of the colonized peoples and their
increasing weight in the construction of a world governance puts the
parity at the center of all the administrative debates distinct from
the economic debates.
There
will be no Europe and no global governance without the establishment
of women in all instances of public authorities and deliberative
assemblies in an equal, joint, de jure and universal way.
One can
lie to oneself, deceive oneself, but one can not escape this
question.
27) - A
historical comparison.
In 1978,
the historian Philippe Dawson published an article on the conditions
of the drafting of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the
Citizen.
Cf .:
Historical Annals of the French Revolution Year 1978 pp. 161-179
In July
1789, the National Assembly formed the 6th Bureau, to draft a draft
declaration of human rights. It is not a "great man" who
wrote these articles but the National Assembly on presentation of
this report.
Parliament
today faces a constitutional break in principle. He is in the same
situation as his ancestors of 1789.
I would
like parliamentarians to compare the quality of their situations,
their training, their public capacities, to those of these editors
and to look at each other in the mirror:
Marquis
de Fumel Monségur, Field Marshal, nobility, Agen
Vauquelin,
Marquis de Vrigny, captain of cavalry, nobility Alençon
The Count
of Culant, brigadier of the armies of the King, nobility, Angouleme
The
Marquis de Guilhem-Clermont-Lodeve, naval officer, nobility,
Arles-ville.
Repoux,
lawyer, Third Estate, Autun
Bouchette,
lawyer, Third-state, Bailleul
David,
parish priest of Lormaison, clergy, Beauvais.
The hen,
lawyer, Third Estate, Besançon
De Luze
Létang, Notary, Third Estate, Bordeaux
Baron de
Wimpffen, sergeant, nobility, Caen.
Count de
Toulouse-Lautrec, Field Marshal, Castres
Bouvet,
merchant and judge consul, Third Estate, Chartres,
Lemoine
de Bellisle, nobility, Chaumont-en-Vexin
Lubois,
priest of Fontenay, clergy, Coutances
Baron de
Chalion, advisor to the Dauphiné Parliament
Guilloz,
priest of Orchamp-en-Vennes, clergy, Dôle
Beauperray,
farmer and horse dealer, Third Estate, Évreux
The
Marquis de Biencourt, camp marshal, nobility, Guérêt.
28) –
Conclusion
Television
regularly teaches us that:
1- the
leaders of the country are looking for cheap ways to reform, to bring
closer the power of the citizens, to give hope to the little girls,
to democratize the governing bodies, etc.
2-
Governments are concerned about France's place in the world and the
usefulness of its message.
Parity of
right corresponds to all these criteria. All over the world, people
are waiting for this message from France.
It would
suffice to ask Asia Bibi, American women who want to abort, French
girls who give up scientific studies.
Marc
SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire