Google translation at the end of the text
Paris
on Sunday 3 September 2017
Copy:
Embassies
of China, South Korea, North Korea, United States, Europe, Japan, Russia.
President
of the French Republic
Reflection
on the Korean crisis
The
poverty of the remarks of the statesmen leads the quidams to participate in the
public reflection on the reasons for the repetition of the Korean crises.
Instead
of seeking the Good and the Bad, it is better to ask what drives the policies
of the two Koreas and ultimately constitutes their raison d'etre.
Before
being a different social-economic regime, the two Koreas are first of all zones
whose primary function is the exclusion of the military power of the opposite
camp and the preservation of a political monopoly in its own camp.
It
is not the populations that define these two state entities. These are the
military-political apparatuses that were produced by the rifts of the Second World
War.
The
frontier of the 38th parallel is not a separation of two sovereignties but the
true constitutional reference of these two political regimes.
This
separation strictly defines the political line of these two military regimes.
It is the quest for reunification. Separation justifies, legalises, and bases
the thesis of reunification.
Both
sides consider that this peace in separation is transitory and that the aim of
the policy of each of the two parties is to unify the two parties and to
reconstitute a single country.
In
other words, unifying reconquest is the political and diplomatic standard for
both parties.
Today, the novelty is that
one of the two camps can no longer support civil competition vis-à-vis the
other and that the unifying reconquest is no longer a rhetoric for him.
North Korea has missed a
turning point and neither the Russian Federation nor the People's Republic of
China envisage participating in any reunification of the two Koreas and a
fortiori to support North Korea in such a chimera.
These
two powers support North Korea first because it is the territorial access to
their own territory. These two countries can not agree to see the United States
moving to their borders.
If
North Korea can no longer ensure this continuity in unifying ambition, it does
not come out of the unitary demand.
She
finds it in the other side, the alliance of South Korea and the United States.
It
adapts to its inferiority vis-à-vis South Korea and expresses the unifying
ideology in uncompromising defense of a besieged country.
South
Korea has strengthened its positions and preserved its unifying impulses
intact.
The
numbers of hesitation are there only to mask the primary purpose of the South
Korean policy supported by the United States, or the reverse, which is to
integrate North Korea to its power perimeter.
The
arming of North Korea does not therefore disturb the peaceful tranquility of
peaceful coexistence.
It
is an answer to a double question:
a- The inability of North
Korea to subjugate South Korea and develop a declared policy of unifying
reconquest.
b-
The inclusion of South Korea in the continuation of the policy of unifying
reconquest.
By this armaments, North
Korea reproduces the ideology of the reconquest by transforming it into a policy
of opposition to any absorption or subjugation by South Korea.
North
Korea thus maintains the military debate and has the means to oppose all forms
of right-of-way on the part of South Korea and the United States.
The
Camp that can no longer win this race for reunification remains in the
competition by forbidding the other to do so.
The repetition of
antagonisms as well as the constitution of the means to support them are
produced by the denial of the nonsense of the policy of reunification.
As
long as this issue is not addressed publicly, the reunification of the
reunification remains the primary function of each of the two camps and
continuously produces adventurous policies.
The
only way out of these battles is to acknowledge the inanity of the policy of
reunification.
The
powder magazine of Korea can only be pacified under the following conditions:
1-
By treaty, the two Koreas give up any policy of reunification, of hegemony over
one another, of the state encroachment of the sovereignty of one on the other,
of the subjection of one to political or military units desired by the other.
2-
The United States and Japan commit themselves by a treaty with the states
concerned to never cross the 38th parallel, to invade North Korea, to install troops
there, to include it in a military network that is favorable to them, either
directly or through intermediaries.
3-
The Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China undertake by treaty
with the States concerned to never cross the 38th parallel, invade South Korea,
install troops there, include it in a military network either favorably,
directly or through intermediaries.
These
discussions could be held in Paris where a place had already presided over this
function during the Vietnam War.
If
no one wants to give up anything, the military and nuclear arsenal will
continue to accumulate and eventually explode; by chance but necessarily.
The
whole question is whether, once again, the States concerned have no interest in
maintaining a powder magazine which they are convinced of controlling; as in
Sarajevo in 1914.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire