Email:
salomone.marc@neuf.fr / blog: madic50.blogspot.com
Paris,
Thursday, October 4, 2018
Madam
Minister of Justice,
I do not
have money for the RAR. I hope nobody will take this opportunity to
erase the text below.
1) - The
overflow
1- On the
one hand:
Magistrates
use the press to say the President of the Republic "this guy is
crazy. He does what he wants. For the sole reason that he recalls
that the magistracy is an authority and that he alone is a power;
that is, he proceeds from universal suffrage.
They also
take the opportunity to say that "Nicole Belloubet is a minister
without power and unable to choose the right person. "
2- On the
other hand:
They
consciously organize the inequality of the French before the law by
social and racial segregation.
I lived
their solidarity with the rapists, the torturers, the thieves,
according to the social status of the aggressors and the aggressed.
Today, I
learn that the same goes for racism and the immediate individual
consequences of this practice; in this case the deprivation of meals.
Even in
case of danger the poor French can never access justice.
I'm fed
up !
3- The
maneuver
The Union
of Magistrates USM says about the appointment of the Prosecutor of
the Republic of Paris: "There is a kind of power maneuver that
is problematic."
It
recognizes that the activity of the top executives of the state can
be "maneuver" and "problematic".
This is
exactly what the action of the prosecutor of the Republic in this
complaint.
2) - the
facts
The
simplicity of the facts:
Two men,
aged 20 and 68, both leave the hospital for a broken ankle. They both
have a brooch and screws as an ankle.
They
arrive the same day, at the same time, simultaneously, at the
Salvation Army Soup, in the lobby of the former Chamber of Commerce.
They both
claim, simultaneously, not to be forced to go into the queues that
are reserved for them, because of the danger they run obviously for
their ankles in the jostling inherent in these files.
The three
customary guards recognize these dangers.
They
accept the request for one and refuse it for the other.
They tell
one to stand aside to avoid the jostling.
They
enjoin the other to join his line.
The first
is Arabic, the second French.
The
guards are Arab and black.
When
French tells the guardian that racism is constituted, he tells him to
the magistrates:
You tell
them that! And He waves up and down a finger of honor.
Then he
mobilizes Arabs who come to the soup.
There is
no doubt about the racism of the approach and the consequences of
endangering others.
The
Director of the Center and the National Directorate of the Salvation
Army say that the guards are their exclusive representatives.
3) - The
complaint
You will
find the full complaint below.
I lodge a
complaint for:
"Complaint
against x for racism, refusal of assistance to a person in danger,
refusal to comply with the public purpose of his business, refusal of
food, association of criminals, calculation and premeditation. "
The
prosecution receives the complaint on September 17, 2018, the RAR
being taken as proof.
He
answers on September 19, 2018.
In other
words: he answers by return mail.
The
public prosecutor says: "I have the honor to inform you that I
have read your complaint of September 10, 2018, which has received my
full attention. "
He did
not take the time to pay any attention.
As for
rapes, tortures, thefts:
a- He
gauged the social condition of the speakers, the assailant is poor,
the aggressor is a semi-public institution.
b- As a
result, he covered the offense or the crime of the institution of the
strongest socially.
2- All is
allowed with a poor person.
A- The
maneuver
a- The
public prosecutor conveys this complaint in the service of the "press
and protection of freedoms".
b- It
finds that the "facts" are "denounced under a
qualification other than that of insult"
c. He
therefore creates facts which he declares to be nonexistent for this
service.
B- The
trick
a- He
discovers that these facts that he himself invented:
b- Do not
therefore concern the 6th division, section AC4
c- "Do
not appear characterized" under the qualification of insult.
C- It
follows:
"As
a result your complaint is closed to my prosecution under the number
indicated above. "
D- The
signature is intentionally made illegible. Why name yourself in front
of a poor person?
3- The
undue transfer
By
resorting to this trick, the public prosecutor himself says that the
racist action without sentence and the refusal of assistance do not
belong to the 6th division, AC4.
The
transfer of the complaint in this service is therefore corporatist
solidarity.
4) - The
injury
Addressing
a poor, the public prosecutor believes smart, funny no doubt,
stacking vexations:
"Furthermore, I tell you that the prosecutor's office does not take the initiative to investigate and prosecute personal injury. "
"Furthermore, I tell you that the prosecutor's office does not take the initiative to investigate and prosecute personal injury. "
I recall
that the only "insult" that was made and that is
"characterized" was intended for "justice".
Even a
sub-man knows that "justice" is not a "particular"
but an institution.
The
prosecution can therefore take "the initiative of investigation
and prosecution of insult".
5) - The
obstruction
By
referring to the Dean of Investigating Judges, the public prosecutor
knows full well that he is obstructing the functioning of justice.
1-
Accessibility
a- The
procedure initiated by the prosecution is free.
b- The
procedure initiated by the Dean is paid. Regardless of the law, the
Dean requires a sum that was in 2000 2000 euros for a complaint for
rape and torture filed by a smicard. It did not have to diminish.
Money,
therefore, automatically eliminates the poor.
2- Legal
Aid
These
remarks are all the more odious because the public prosecutor knows
that the condition for legal aid or private legal insurance to work
is the opening of an investigation, the judicial consideration of the
complaint.
The
presence of a lawyer is necessary first of all to understand the
legal mumbo jumbo such as: "You have the faculty either to seize
the competent civil or criminal jurisdiction, or to (see) before the
Dean of the investigating judges. "
This
institutional requirement is mentioned in the complaint. The
prosecutor has read it, he knows it, he has fun.
3-
Deprivation of a lawyer
When the
public prosecutor says: "I invite you to contact a lawyer who
can assist you in your approach",
He knows
:
a- That
he addresses a poor man who eats at the charitable soup
b- It
prohibits him any legal aid by refusing the engagement of pursuits,
c) It
therefore prohibits the access of this litigant to a lawyer.
6) - The
inequality of the French before the courts
If the
roles were reversed, if the complainant was an Arab French and the
aggressor a European French, the judicial information of the media
show that the prosecutor would have followed this racist aggression.
The
public prosecutor is there in "a sort of maneuver" which
"poses a problem".
7) –
Conclusion
Under
cover of a ritual reminder of the settlement, the public prosecutor
threatens to take sides with the attackers.
I would
not say it surprises me. These threats are the ordinary course of
action of magistrates towards the poor and the vulnerable.
Certainly,
I do not allow myself to say who will be the prosecutor of the
republic
But I am
able to ask you that the one who is in place for everyone, that he
works according to the rules of equality of all before the law, and
that it allows access for all to a lawyer.
It took
them less than a day to take up the fight for the racists. I hope it
will not take much more to compel them to take sides for the right.
Please
accept, Madam Minister, the assurances of my highest regards,
Marc
SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire