Translation google translate
The French text is the reference
Marc Salomone / marcsalomone@sfr.fr / Blog: madic50.blogspot.com (censured) / Book: The two forms, ed. Amazon.
Paris, Wednesday, October 5, 2022
For: Mr. Attorney General at the Court of Appeal
Appeal of the dismissal decision of August 24, 2024 by the anti-terrorism public prosecutor, via Aurélie Belliot, deputy prosecutor, of the complaint of June 8, 2022.
N./Ref. : Complaint of June 8, 2022 / supplement of June 20, 2022
V./Ref. attached: Letter of 24.08.2022 / P.22236000384
"You can challenge this classification decision by sending a reasoned letter and accompanied by a copy of this classification notice to the Attorney General at the Court of Appeal. »
Mr. Attorney General at the Court of Appeal,
1. Preamble
A lawyer and the Point d'accès au droit tell me that the notice of classification without follow-up of August 24, 2022, posted on August 26, 2022, does not include a deadline. There is none in the Notice.
So I took the time to work on the arguments of the Appeal.
The purpose of this letter is not to establish the facts and the analysis developed in the complaint but to respond to the arguments of the Classification without follow-up of the Public Prosecutor's Office.
The public prosecutor dismisses his classification opinion because of one and only argument: "the facts that you denounce do not fall within the territorial jurisdiction of the French courts. »
He sees it as a "legal obstacle".
This argument is based on a motivation of the complaint: "Complaint dated June 08, 2022 received in my services on June 17, 2022 against X counts of war crimes"
I will demonstrate that these two elements on which the prosecution bases its decision are falsifications of the text of the complaint and of the law.
It is a voluntary operation that is morally based:
a- on the one hand on a lack of consideration of the equality of all in law and therefore of the capacities of everyone, indiscriminately, to address the justice system to bring to their attention a crime.
In accordance with art. 1 of the Constitution: "It ensures the equality before the law of all citizens without distinction of origin, race or religion. »
b- on the other hand on the misunderstanding, to say the least, of the urgency for the law and its representatives to take their place in a debate where they must occupy the first place.
In doing so, unless it creates new "legal obstacles" not mentioned in the decision of the prosecution, it seems to me that the complaint and the request for the opening of an investigation will become admissible.
2)- The decision of the prosecution
The dismissal letter from the Public Prosecutor of the Anti-Terrorist Prosecutor's Office of August 24, 2022, specifies:
"V/Ref: Complaint dated June 08, 2022 received in my office on June 17, 2022 against X counts of war crimes
" Sir,
I hereby inform you that the aforementioned complaint has been filed without further action at my prosecutor's office under the reference number.
Indeed, the examination of this procedure does not justify criminal prosecution on the grounds that the facts that you denounce do not fall within the territorial jurisdiction of the French courts.
The facts you complained about cannot be judged due to a legal obstacle.
Therefore, the prosecution can no longer pursue this case in court.
You can contest this classification decision by sending a reasoned letter accompanied by a copy of this classification notice to the public prosecutor at the Court of Appeal.
You also have the possibility of overriding my decision by continuing the procedure yourself either through:
Of the criminal trial
Civil lawsuit. »
3)- The complaint
1- The aim
On June 8, 2022, I sent to the public prosecutor a reflection having the value of a complaint about a crime consisting in the disqualification of women in Afghanistan and concerning Western executives, including French present on the scene, for counts of complicity in crimes against humanity and participation in a war crime.
I call them journalists since the journalist who reports the facts that I study presented them thus on television.
He himself lives in France and contributes regularly to a weekly newspaper; The chained Duck.
This collaboration reinforces the reliability of his testimony.
This complaint is fair and does not involve the magistrates in any partisan position.
It aims to qualify the facts and their perpetrators and to give the law and its representatives the opportunity to take their rightful place and which they alone can ensure and assume in the public debate opened by this crime; where war, politics, civil debate, fail to account for the facts.
2- The prosecution's response
The answer of August 24, 2022 comes from the public prosecutor of the anti-terrorism prosecution.
It builds the falsification of the title of the complaint, the omission of legal references that allow it to be studied, the ignorance of the urgency of the presence of the law.
5)- The falsification of the title of the complaint
1- The complaint relates to:
"the possible criminal responsibilities of French and Europeans, as complicity in crimes against humanity and war crimes. (See complaint p.1)
2- The prosecution's response relates to:
"V/Ref: Complaint dated June 08, 2022 received in my office on June 17, 2022 against X counts of war crimes"
The falsification is patent.
6)- The link between the two crimes
War crimes can only be conceived through complicity with crimes against humanity.
The Taliban are the branch of administrative supremacy, where the other Mujahideen branches organize the supremacy of the private, of the Warlords.
Even if the Taliban administratively rationalizes an oppression that other branches mix with the art of individual looting and turf wars; both humanely disqualify women as the basis of their politics.
The human disqualification of women is a crime against humanity.
To women who question them about their rights, journalists respond that the Mujahideen's political war aims outweigh women's rights.
In doing so, they are complicit in crimes against humanity.
By sharing the military continuity of this civilian crime, by accepting de facto the subordination of their support for the strictly military activities of their allies to the regular commission of a crime by them, they are guilty of participation in a war crime. .
All the more so since they know that the official reason for their support for the military activity of the Mujahideen (the rejection of Soviet troops) has been moot for several years.
It is still necessary to agree to qualify the disqualification of one sex (women), by the other, or for the benefit of the other (men) as a crime against humanity.
7)- The function of mutilation
This deletion of one of the two criminal references by the prosecution seems voluntary.
It is a question of reducing the complaint to a trick, a thing, a contraption.
This complaint must be dissociated from the activity of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan and the responsibilities taken on this occasion by certain Western executives.
This is reflected in the information provided by the prosecution to object to the dismissal:
The complaint is likened to "the summoning of an adversary" and a claim for damages against that person.
It is well mentioned the request "to open an investigation by means of a constitution of civil party before the dean of the investigating judges".
But, you have to pay.
However, I specified in the complaint that I am forced to AJ.
8)- The exclusion of women's rights.
Thus, women are put out of the attention of justice.
The complaint is reduced to a virtual denunciation of a common law crime committed by one or more individuals against the author of the complaint.
It is a recomposition of the complaint.
In the discussion reported by the journalist quoted, the question is not that of the communication of an address of a brothel for minors.
It is the fate of Afghan women, in their Totality, that is at stake.
The facts will prove these interlocutors right.
Journalists and other potential attendees answer this question: do they agree to make a pact with those who will disqualify the humanity of women?
Their verbal, expressed answer is yes and it is subject to judicial attention.
So the journalists respond to the women that the Mujahideen have priority over them.
The prosecution makes it known by the rejection of this complaint that those who collaborated in delivering them to their executioners and to slavery are untouchable.
This goes against French and European case law.
9)- Two types of war crimes:
All armies commit war crimes.
a- When a Frenchman in 1944 sided with the American army, he assumed the militarily useless bombardments of villages or towns.
But the Americans do not come to France to raze the cities. They come to hunt the Germans.
b- When Afghan women ask journalists on which side they are, they ask them to choose between their right to humanity and people who kill in the context of a military battle that no longer has any place and whose main if not unique goal is to build a new, modern society, which is based on the disqualification of women.
It is moreover because the fate of women is their only concern, which they will constantly demonstrate thereafter, that the Mujahideen, all, refuse to enter the government of national unity as proposed by the government in place. .
The official reason for the war has been extinguished for four years with the departure of Soviet troops in 1988.
To pass all this mutilation and the mess it generates, it is possible and even necessary to use legal references to threaten twice without seeming to touch the plaintiff with legal, financial and penal repressions, knowing that he is poor and that he is waiting for the legal response to seek legal aid.
10)- The evasion of legal references
1- The only reason for the rejection
The anti-terrorism prosecution invalidates the complaint on the basis of a single reason that of "a legal obstacle".
I note that the anti-terrorism prosecution does not retain any reason that would come from the content of the complaint itself.
He bases the dismissal of the complaint on a simple question of procedure.
This is why Madame Aurélie Belliot, Deputy Prosecutor, who drafts the text for the prosecutor notes:
a- informs
"I hereby inform you that the aforementioned complaint is dismissed at my prosecutor's office"
b- the fact
"Indeed, the examination of this procedure does not justify a criminal prosecution"
c- the pattern
"on the grounds that the facts you denounce do not fall within the territorial jurisdiction of the French courts. »
d- the "legal obstacle"
“The facts you complained about cannot be tried due to a legal impediment. »
e- accordingly
“Therefore, the prosecution can no longer pursue this case in court. »
There is no "suite" because "the procedure does not justify criminal prosecution" for the sole "reason of a legal obstacle" which is the exclusion of the subject from "territorial jurisdiction".
The validity of this "dismissal" rests solely on this "legal hurdle".
2- Erasure
In the same way that the anti-terrorist prosecutor's office voluntarily erases complicity in crimes against humanity; it erases "universal jurisdiction" in favor of only "territorial jurisdiction".
We are clearly in the ideology of self-segregation by referring the overbearing to their local concerns seen as a restrictive assignment.
It therefore falls to me to examine this question of Jurisdiction.
11)- Professional morality
I am not accountable here for a discussion on Skills.
Judges are deemed to know the rules.
I find that the district attorney omits one of the two Jurisdiction rules; voluntarily since he knows them.
I therefore recall the existence of this one and its qualities concerning us.
Moreover, no magistrate, and especially not those of the Anti-Terrorist Prosecutor's Office, needs to be reminded of the rules of operation of Universal Jurisdiction.
Consequently, the book references to the Competences of French justice, below, are not intended to teach magistrates that they exist and how but to examine the logic by which the anti-terrorism prosecution denies or manipulates their existence in the present case.
12)- Skills
There are two Skill rules; territorial and universal.
Universal Jurisdiction is now a recognized jurisdiction in the same way as Territorial Jurisdiction.
It is enshrined in all the treaties establishing international courts of justice that France has helped to set up and that it has signed.
The anti-terrorist prosecutor's office has no professional reason to omit this Competence in the motivation of a follow-up or classification decision.
He is simply convinced that this voluntary censorship will not be followed up because of the plaintiff's social status or covered by obscure solidarities.
13)- A souvenir
Many years ago, the magistrates condemned a young man who had left to shoot in Asia.
He had been denounced by the photographer who had developed his souvenir photos.
One of them showed him with his Asian companions posing in front of an enemy's head on the ground.
Although he had demonstrated that he had never fired a gun or killed anyone, he was sentenced to a prison term.
The facts took place 10,000 km from France.
At the time, universal jurisdiction was new to the ordinary functioning of justice. It had to be installed.
He was neither a journalist nor an associate, just a somewhat unbalanced Tartarin who had wanted a great adventure to tell his friends.
He did not understand.
He committed suicide upon his release from prison.
14)- Universal Jurisdiction
Seen on the internet, Universal Jurisdiction has two qualities that concern us:
1- Cairn.info
“Universal jurisdiction consists of the ability of a judge to try an offense regardless of where it was committed and regardless of the nationality of the perpetrator and that of the victim. »
2- Universal jurisdiction - TRIAL International
"Under this principle, States have the possibility (and sometimes even the obligation) to prosecute the perpetrators of international crimes found on their territory - and this wherever the crimes were committed and whatever the nationality of the perpetrators. and victims. »
3- What is universal jurisdiction? - Amnesty International France
a- Universal jurisdiction means that the State is competent to prosecute and judge an offense when it has not been committed on its territory, when it has been committed by a foreign person, against a foreign victim, and without that State being the victim of the offence.
b- There are two main categories of universal jurisdiction:
Absolute universal jurisdiction:
aa- the courts of State A have jurisdiction even if no legal link seems to attach the offense to said State A.
In particular, the courts of country A can try people who have committed a crime abroad and who are not on the territory of country A.
ab- Relative universal jurisdiction: the courts of country A only have jurisdiction if there is a legal connection with country A. In particular, the perpetrator of the offense is located in country A.
15)- The French code
According to Amnesty International, France attaches three conditions to its participation in the exercise of Universal Jurisdiction:
1- Residence
- The person responsible for a genocide, crime against humanity or war crime can only be prosecuted if he "habitually resides" on French territory.
2- The monopoly of the prosecutor's office
a- The law entrusts the monopoly of prosecution to the Public Prosecutor's Office: this eliminates the possibility for a victim or association to initiate proceedings by filing a complaint with a civil action. -
b- This provision is interesting because it denounces the means used by the Anti-Terrorist Prosecutor's Office to refuse to lend its support to this complaint.
c- the prosecution writes:
"You also have the option of overriding my decision by pursuing the procedure yourself either through:
OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL:
- by seizing the competent court by direct summons;
You must ask a bailiff to summon your opponent to court. If you have recourse to the assistance of a lawyer, it is he who will contact the bailiff.
- or by requesting the opening of an investigation by means of a constitution of civil party before the dean of the investigating judges.
In this case, you will be asked to pay a sum fixed by the examining magistrate in guarantee of the payment of the civil fine likely to be pronounced if your constitution of civil party is considered to be abusive or dilatory. »
This sum is here exclusively a means of social segregation.
d- The anti-terrorist public prosecutor says "my decision".
It's not a simple copy-paste.
However, according to Amnesty International, recourse to the constitution of a civil party is prohibited by law in this case.
He therefore knows that his advice is worthless.
e- this dysfunction in the councils stems from the mutilation of the complaint.
By this mutilation, the prosecution makes it a neighborhood complaint.
f- It is an evasion of the responsibilities of the prosecution combined with the expression of brutal social contempt.
The silent contempt of enslaved women combined with the talkative hatred of the poor.
g- the law therefore enjoins the Public Prosecutor's Office to take responsibility for the opening of information.
3- Co-jurisdiction
"The acts must be punishable both by French law and by the legislation of the State where they were committed under the condition of dual criminality. Thus, it is enough that a State has not provided for genocide in its national law to prevent prosecution in France on this basis. France therefore encourages impunity in the States where such crimes have been committed. »
I will explain below that this rule is compatible with the complaint.
16)- The case in point
The filed complaint falls under these three conditions:
1- Residence
The reporter of the facts is a French journalist who lives in France and works regularly for a French weekly.
He will say who the others are.
One cannot assume their strangeness before knowing them.
2- The monopoly of the prosecutor's office
a- I can only speak to him.
b- It is a question of obtaining an investigation. What goes through the floor.
Which rejects without valid reason.
3- Co-jurisdiction
The Taliban government is not recognized by the French government. And this is not the only one.
Therefore the Constitution and the law of reference are those of the previous government, the one that the Taliban overthrew by force alone without any recognized legal procedure.
What does the legal Afghan law recognized by world legal bodies say?
Wikipedia:
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
The Afghan constitution governed the organization of the Afghan state formed by the International Coalition between the fall of the Taliban regime in October-December 2001 and their resumption of power in August 2021. It was adopted in January 2004 by an assembly of notables Afghans.
Preamble
The Preamble to the Constitution mentions eleven points which preside over the main principles of the text1. Islam as the religion of the Afghan people and the difficult resistance of the jihad against the Soviets are the first points recognized.
However, many other points are asserted:
• respect for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights1;
• the guarantee of national unity, the sovereignty of the country and its integrity1;
• the rejection of oppression, discrimination, atrocities and the establishment of a society based on the rule of law, social justice, protection of human rights and dignity;
• ensuring the development of a prosperous country and a healthy environment;
• put the country back on the international scene.
Chapter II of the constitution has 37 articles that define the rights and duties of Afghan citizens.
a- the first principles laid down are those of equality between men and women (article 21)
b- duty of the State to respect and protect the freedom of its citizens (article 22)3.
c- justice, the presumption of innocence and the right to counsel are established and torture is prohibited3.
Such a constitution can only include the recognition of war crimes and crimes against humanity in its legal corpus.
This case therefore fulfills all the boxes of Universal Jurisdiction.
17)- The urgency of the law
Assured of the oblivion of the remark thus buried, the prosecution casually uses fallacious, constructed arguments to eliminate the examination of a request for an investigation into the participation of networks of Western executives, by some of their members, in new criminality wearing the clothes of customary ideological practices.
In doing so, he ignores the urgency of the presence of the law and therefore of judges in the emergence of these practices and their metastases.
This urgency is recalled almost daily by the news from Afghanistan and the Western metastases of the victory of this type of crime.
The news now extends this urgency to Iran and the consequences of its "Talibanization" on Europe. (To see further).
Three current examples bear witness to this:
1- The rejection of the constitutionality of abortion by the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
2- The double repetition in the same terms of the Taliban logic with regard to the Finnish Prime Minister, Mrs. Sanna Marin.
a- the obligation made to her, by organizations unable to demand it, to submit to a drug test for the sole reason that she danced.
b- the questioning of her legitimacy to exercise power because she danced.
Madam Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not mistaken.
She posted a photo showing her dancing for fun while performing her duties.
c- At the same time, a woman of the same rank as her, President of the European Commission, Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, was spending three days in the ecumenical community of Taizé. She explained that she came there to "find inspiration in the difficult times that Europe is going through".
Each his own.
The fact is that no one found fault with this step aside with regard to his work.
d- In one case, a woman dances, she is a whore, in the other, she submits to a religious order, she is in her place.
e- I think that only the penetration of the metastases of the Taliban victory can explain this institutional dissociation (because there are practical effects) between the choices of these two stateswomen.
It is from both that this modernity based on the disqualification of women is forged.
However, it is neither Muslim customs nor Protestant Puritanism that are in question.
It is a political industrialization of these doctrines that makes them a new ideological practice.
f- The fact that networks of Finnish executives were able to contribute to it in 2022 lends credibility to the idea that European journalists were also able to contribute to the same operation in Afghanistan in 1992.
3- On September 16, 2022, the Iranian morality police somehow homicide Miss Mahsa Amini.
Madame Azadeh Kian, French-Iranian sociologist, professor of sociology and director of the Center for Teaching, Documentation and Research for Feminist Studies (CEDREF) at Paris-Diderot University; speaks of the "Talibanization" of the Iranian regime.
The event is significant enough for the French government to publish a condemnation and for the American government to take "sanctions" against the heads of the Iranian service responsible for the facts.
Again, dozens of people are dying in Iran seeking justice.
The center of this debate is again the disqualification of women. The facts concern the control of the obligation to wear a public sign of their specific servitude.
This is confirmed by women who risk their lives by removing this garment.
18)- Inequality in law
It would be good if, on this occasion, the magistrates forgot the ordinary social segregation in the functioning of justice by selecting litigants according to their financial capacity to hire a lawyer themselves, to use the civil party constitution, by court costs.
Social selection is also made by the innocuous threat of financial repression if the importunate persists.
1- Constitution of Civil Party:
"In this case, you will be asked to pay a sum set by the investigating judge as security for the payment of the civil fine that may be imposed if your civil action is deemed abusive or dilatory. »
2- Legal Aid (AJ)
“a- In the event of insufficient resources, you can request the benefit of legal aid, by writing to the following address:….
b- I draw your attention to the fact that Article 177-2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for the sanction of abusive civil party filings. »
These threats being said of course under the guise of a reminder of the law.
At 71, having filed a complaint for rape, sexual violence, racism, spoliation and exploitation of the mentally handicapped, I have experience, even limited, of the socially segregated and violent functioning of justice, both judges and lawyers , with respect to vulnerable persons; not to mention the cultural hatreds that are added to it.
As self-evident, it always begins with the travesty of the grounds for the complaint, then the ritual accusation of lying, the search for mental discredit and the silting of the procedure.
I therefore request from you the calm and professional examination of the question raised.
It is a complaint, it is motivated, it relates to the qualifications of a crime against humanity and a war crime.
I specified in the complaint that I must have the declaration of opening of an investigation by the justice to be able to dispose of the AJ and to entrust a lawyer with the care of following the procedure.
19) - Courage and Fear
Afghans and Iranians protest saying, "We are not afraid!" »
But they must show that courage that commands admiration.
Here we do not need courage.
Greatness, public service, is honesty.
Courage is the impotent result of our failures, our cowardice, our intellectual limits.
The intimate question that the French must answer, on the other hand, is that of what and of whom are we afraid?
20)- The right
The law is inseparable from its representatives. It includes both judges and lawyers from both parties.
1- He knows very well how to judge the defeated or those who do not yet know that the social system in which they are part is obsolete. It accompanies their conversion.
French jurists know how to accompany the downgrading of petty chiefs, religious or civil.
2- On the other hand, this ranking without follow-up indicates that it has not found its place in the judgment of the winners or in the confrontations where the devices of tomorrow are being built today.
21)- The originality of the subject
By this complaint, I draw the attention of justice to an original legal course.
1- Judge the strongest
This criminality does not concern the belated macho victories of yesterday but the winners of the fight in which the journalists and associates concerned have joined, which consists in presenting the disqualification of women as a solution to the questions of modernity.
a- The Mujahideen defeated the communist government and the Taliban version of the Mujahideen defeated the democratic government installed by the Americans and established the supremacy of Quran law over civil law.
b- Western journalists or associates who contributed to the victory of their Mujahideen allies are part of both the victory against the Afghan communist government and the installation of the crime of disqualification of women.
c- Both are among the winners of post-Soviet geopolitics.
2- Judge the "builders"
By accompanying them passively, the law subordinates itself to the winners who claim to be the founders of this new world and therefore of its law.
They cannot be criminals because they are the de facto or de jure writers of legal codes.
From now on, they are the ones who designate the criminals.
A primary function of the victors being to bring to justice the criminals of this new version of the law.
a- The Taliban manufacture their litigants.
b- The journalists do not hesitate either to point out the criminals of the moment to justice.
c- For lack of available justice, these criminals can be apprehended by the destruction of their country and executed by pseudo-unknowns. This was the case of President Gaddafi and his country, Libya.
3- Judging "friends"
This time, the judges are also faced with examining the criminality of people who are on their own side in the geostrategic space of the 1978-1992 war in Afghanistan; that of the Cold War.
Again, that doesn't take "courage" (we leave that to Afghan women).
It requires honesty, lucidity, professionalism.
4- Becoming
On the other hand, the Finnish example (and many others which do not concern the Statesmen or Women) convince us that if the law is not said, the European generations to come will once again have to show courage to towards their "friends", the victors, the prescribers of the law.
22)- Closing
1- I think I answered all the arguments in the package point by point; without discriminating or forgetting a single one.
2- This complaint is perfectly in line with French law and the justice system has all the instruments to open information and investigate, such as, if necessary, the Criminal Research Institute of the National Gendarmerie (IRCGN).
3- We can no doubt recognize in this questioning the imprint of reality, necessity and urgency.
Thanking you for your attention,
Please accept, Mr. Attorney General, the assurance of my best regards.
Marc SALOMONE
retired worker
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE
Liberty equality fraternity
NATIONAL ANTI-TERRORIST PROSECUTOR'S
Crimes against Humanity, war crimes and offenses unit
The Anti-Terrorism Public Prosecutor
to: Mr. Marc SALOMONE
122 bis boulevard Davout
75O2O PARIS
V/Ref: Complaint dated June 08, 2022 received in my services on June 17, 2022 against X of the heads of
war crimes
O/Ref: P.222360OO384
Sir,
I hereby inform you that the aforementioned complaint has been filed without further action at my prosecutor's office under the reference number.
Indeed, the examination of this procedure does not justify criminal prosecution on the grounds that the facts that you denounce do not fall within the territorial jurisdiction of the French courts.
The facts you complained about cannot be judged due to a legal obstacle. Therefore, the prosecution can no longer pursue this case in court.
You can contest this classification decision by sending a reasoned letter accompanied by a copy of this classification notice to the public prosecutor at the Court of Appeal.
You also have the possibility of overriding my decision by continuing the procedure yourself either through:
OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL:
- by seizing the competent court by direct summons;
You must ask a bailiff to summon your opponent to court. If you have recourse to the assistance of a lawyer, it is he who will contact the bailiff.
- or by requesting the opening of an investigation by means of a constitution of civil party before the dean of the investigating judges.
In this case, you will be asked to pay a sum fixed by the examining magistrate in guarantee of the payment of the civil fine likely to be pronounced if your constitution of civil party is considered to be abusive or dilatory.
P2
OF THE CIVIL TRIAL:
Ask a bailiff to summon your opponent before the civil court to claim payment of damages.
If you intend to claim damages for an amount less than or equal to 4OO0 euros, you must bring the case before the court near your opponent's domicile.
If you intend to claim damages for an amount between 4000 and 1000 euros, you must bring the case before the district court of your opponent's domicile.
At the hearing, you can appear in person, or be represented by a lawyer or a relative (your spouse, your relatives and allies in direct line, people exclusively attached to your personal service or your company).
If you intend to claim damages for an amount greater than 10,000, you must bring the case before the high court of your opponent's domicile.
In this case, you must hire a lawyer.
In the event of insufficient resources, you can request the benefit of legal aid, in
writing to the following address:
Judicial Court of Paris
Legal aid office
Forecourt of the Court
75859 PARIS CEDEX 17
I draw your attention to the fact that Article 177-2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for the sanction of abusive civil party filings.
Although the complaint you have filed has been closed, if you maintain your intention to obtain compensation for your damage, you can ask the president of the bar association to appoint a lawyer for you to assist you. in your steps.
To this end, you must send the attached form.
You are advised that the costs of this lawyer will be at your expense. However, if your monthly income
are below the ceiling set by law (936 euros for total legal aid, 1367 euros for partial legal aid), you will be able to benefit from legal aid, the lawyer's fees then being covered in full or part by the state.
For any additional information on this point, you can contact the legal aid office at the tribunal de grande instance.
" If you want to know more: www.justice.gouv.fr, section "rights and procedures" "
Please accept, Madam, Sir, the expression of my consideration
Done in Paris, August 24, 2022'
P/THE PROSECUTOR OF THE ANTI-TERRORIST REPUBLIC
Aurélie BELLIOT, Deputy Prosecutor
P3
Mr. President of the Paris Bar Association
11 Place Dauphine
75053 PARIS CEDEX 01
Parquet number:
I, the undersigned),
NAME
FIRST NAMES
Born /
at
Domicile: N'
Street
Postal code
Town
asks the President of the Bar to be good enough, in accordance with the provisions of Article 4O-4 paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to appoint me a lawyer within the framework of the procedure in reference which has been the subject of a classification without continuation.
HAS
the
Signature
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire