Email:
marcsalomone@sfr.fr
blog:
madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The Two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris,
Thursday, September 20, 2018
READING
OF THE DUCK DUCK ARTICLE ON A DOCUMENTARY TO DELETE THE
INDIVISIBILITY OF THE REPUBLIC AND THE CONTINUITY OF THE STATE
The
article Chained Duck, 19.09.18, p.7, "Land of exiles"
presents a documentary from France 5. It is shocking.
Indeed,
it is part of a campaign that aims to eliminate the indivisibility of
the republic by removing the constitutional indistinction of races,
origins and religions.
The
activist of religious communalism Edwy Plenel, Director of Médiapart,
has already exposed this factious political program in 2016-2017: the
French Republic is criminal, since the Declaration of 1789, because
because of this universal equality in law it prohibits the laws and
organizations based on these distinctions.
The
method used by the article and probably by the documentary is also
the same as his.
It is a
question of creating a terror of opinion by presenting rantings based
on fallacious examples which all have the sole function of
criminalizing the subject concerned; in this case, the French
Republic.
The old
men of May 68 know this process well. He is the skeleton of all
strata of so-called leftist scams.
It is
very likely that we find here the same party of opinion which a
hundred times on the trade delivers its work.
He could
not destroy the French Republic in 1968. He thinks he has today the
masses and the political environment to achieve this.
A first
important victory of this party is the suppression of this
indistinction of the races in article 2 of the constitution. From now
on, racial separatism can become legal.
This
article presents a television show, a documentary, as there are more
and more.
a- It
aims to present migrants as a block of 20 million French who are
entitled to claim specific legal recognition.
b- This
program follows the racializing campaigns such as "Blacks of
France", "Arabs of France", "Asians of France",
etc.
c- The
figure of "20 million" descendants of migrants is the
recovery of the fetish number of communitarians.
d- It's
been thirty years since the black communitarians say that there are
"20 million" blacks in France.
The writer of the article, probably in the rest of the documentary, quotes the French football team whose victory at the World Cup would be, by the origin of its players, the guarantor of the unity of the La France.
The writer of the article, probably in the rest of the documentary, quotes the French football team whose victory at the World Cup would be, by the origin of its players, the guarantor of the unity of the La France.
In this
respect, one fact deserves attention:
he
presenter of the morning program of France2, the Monday following the
Cup, addressed a sports academician and told him:
Is not
there a problem of discrimination? Indeed, there are five Malians,
which corresponds to the presence of these in France, but there are
only three Maghrebians and already on this side there are questions
about this favoritism.
The break
with the indivisibility of the Republic and the moral and political
elimination of the French are exposed there in any letter.
This goes
hand in hand with:
a- An
Arab player who starts the Cup by shooting in the shin of a black
player.
b- The
statements of the former President of the United States, Barack Obama
in South Africa expressly stipulating that the players are not
"Gallic".
c- The
laughter of black American presenters citing the racial quality of
the team.
d- The
comments of African journalists on the qualified team of African.
A
question arises: How are the famous "20 million"
descendants of migrants invited to take the thing? Victory of France
or step in the final victory of "migrants"?
What are
the main lines of this article that are probably those of the
documentary?
1- The
title "History of a Nation" of the documentary is parallel
to the title "Birth of a Nation" of the founding film of
American public history, in 1915.
2- It is
necessary to instil the idea that the history of France is in fact
"The history of a nation" which is constituted by the
migrants.
3- France
is a "Land of Exiles" in the manner of the United States.
4- France
did not exist before 1871.
5- Until
1871, she is a country:
a- "small
countries" foreign to each other. The provinces are territories
that ignore each other.
b-
foreign corporatisms to each other. The "Canuts lyonnais"
had nothing in common with the "Marseille fishermen".
meaning
for its inhabitants.
6- They
are so stupid that it was necessary to impose on them this unity of
which they are incapable by themselves.
7- This
manufacture was established from the beginning, 1871, by the
definition and the separation of two types of "French".
a- Local
aliens.
b-
Extra-local foreigners; the "migrants".
8- To do
this, the French State invents the "races": the "French
race" the "Jewish race".
9- It
thus produces "the weapon of the assassins".
10-
France is originally anti-Semitic, Hitlerite, genocidal.
11- The
migrants
a- Have
built France.
b- Are
excluded from the "French race".
12- It is
time to recognize the legal equality of these "races" and
these origins.
13-
Migrants are one-third of the French population and they must be
recognized as such.
14-
Migrants are foreigners "from all over the world" who
succeed to local foreigners before 1871.
15- They
bring a humanist organization and erase the previous racist "factory"
of the "French" due to the locals.
16- The
history of France is the story of a crime.
17- The
French must agree to say that:
a-
Without migrants, they are nothing
b- The
racial distinctions are the first administrative distinctions.
18. They
must give way to their judges and liberators.
On this
occasion, Vichy is presented in this article, and probably in the
documentary, as a reference and a continuity whose legality is this
time accepted without discussion.
Marc
SALOMONE
