19.09.18, Canard enchainé, france5, migrants, nation, france, french,

Email: marcsalomone@sfr.fr

blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The Two forms, ed. Amazon

Paris, Thursday, September 20, 2018

READING OF THE DUCK DUCK ARTICLE ON A DOCUMENTARY TO DELETE THE INDIVISIBILITY OF THE REPUBLIC AND THE CONTINUITY OF THE STATE

The article Chained Duck, 19.09.18, p.7, "Land of exiles" presents a documentary from France 5. It is shocking.

Indeed, it is part of a campaign that aims to eliminate the indivisibility of the republic by removing the constitutional indistinction of races, origins and religions.

The activist of religious communalism Edwy Plenel, Director of Médiapart, has already exposed this factious political program in 2016-2017: the French Republic is criminal, since the Declaration of 1789, because because of this universal equality in law it prohibits the laws and organizations based on these distinctions.

The method used by the article and probably by the documentary is also the same as his.

It is a question of creating a terror of opinion by presenting rantings based on fallacious examples which all have the sole function of criminalizing the subject concerned; in this case, the French Republic.

The old men of May 68 know this process well. He is the skeleton of all strata of so-called leftist scams.

It is very likely that we find here the same party of opinion which a hundred times on the trade delivers its work.

He could not destroy the French Republic in 1968. He thinks he has today the masses and the political environment to achieve this.

A first important victory of this party is the suppression of this indistinction of the races in article 2 of the constitution. From now on, racial separatism can become legal.

This article presents a television show, a documentary, as there are more and more.

a- It aims to present migrants as a block of 20 million French who are entitled to claim specific legal recognition.

b- This program follows the racializing campaigns such as "Blacks of France", "Arabs of France", "Asians of France", etc.

c- The figure of "20 million" descendants of migrants is the recovery of the fetish number of communitarians.

d- It's been thirty years since the black communitarians say that there are "20 million" blacks in France.

The writer of the article, probably in the rest of the documentary, quotes the French football team whose victory at the World Cup would be, by the origin of its players, the guarantor of the unity of the La France.

In this respect, one fact deserves attention:

he presenter of the morning program of France2, the Monday following the Cup, addressed a sports academician and told him:

Is not there a problem of discrimination? Indeed, there are five Malians, which corresponds to the presence of these in France, but there are only three Maghrebians and already on this side there are questions about this favoritism.

The break with the indivisibility of the Republic and the moral and political elimination of the French are exposed there in any letter.

This goes hand in hand with:

a- An Arab player who starts the Cup by shooting in the shin of a black player.

b- The statements of the former President of the United States, Barack Obama in South Africa expressly stipulating that the players are not "Gallic".

c- The laughter of black American presenters citing the racial quality of the team.

d- The comments of African journalists on the qualified team of African.

A question arises: How are the famous "20 million" descendants of migrants invited to take the thing? Victory of France or step in the final victory of "migrants"?

What are the main lines of this article that are probably those of the documentary?

1- The title "History of a Nation" of the documentary is parallel to the title "Birth of a Nation" of the founding film of American public history, in 1915.

2- It is necessary to instil the idea that the history of France is in fact "The history of a nation" which is constituted by the migrants.

3- France is a "Land of Exiles" in the manner of the United States.

4- France did not exist before 1871.

5- Until 1871, she is a country:

a- "small countries" foreign to each other. The provinces are territories that ignore each other.

b- foreign corporatisms to each other. The "Canuts lyonnais" had nothing in common with the "Marseille fishermen".

5- The French were "made" after this date to create a nation that had no

 meaning for its inhabitants.

6- They are so stupid that it was necessary to impose on them this unity of which they are incapable by themselves.

7- This manufacture was established from the beginning, 1871, by the definition and the separation of two types of "French".

a- Local aliens.

b- Extra-local foreigners; the "migrants".

8- To do this, the French State invents the "races": the "French race" the "Jewish race".

9- It thus produces "the weapon of the assassins".

10- France is originally anti-Semitic, Hitlerite, genocidal.

11- The migrants

a- Have built France.

b- Are excluded from the "French race".

12- It is time to recognize the legal equality of these "races" and these origins.

13- Migrants are one-third of the French population and they must be recognized as such.

14- Migrants are foreigners "from all over the world" who succeed to local foreigners before 1871.

15- They bring a humanist organization and erase the previous racist "factory" of the "French" due to the locals.

16- The history of France is the story of a crime.

17- The French must agree to say that:

a- Without migrants, they are nothing

b- The racial distinctions are the first administrative distinctions.

18. They must give way to their judges and liberators.

On this occasion, Vichy is presented in this article, and probably in the documentary, as a reference and a continuity whose legality is this time accepted without discussion.

Marc SALOMONE