blog:
madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The two forms, ed. Amazon
1-
Monday, August 6, 2018
REFLECTION
ON THE "CROSS VIOLENCE" OF TWO ETHNIC BANDS AT ORLY
AIRPORT.
Wednesday,
August 1st, 2018.
2-
Friday, August 24, 2018
REFLECTION
ON THE CHALLENGES OF THE FUTURE TRIAL
1) - The
facts
On 1
August 2018, day of their confrontation, MM Booba, Kaaris, eight of
their relatives, are incarcerated in Fleury-Merogis and Fresnes, in
custody.
On August
14, 2018, they are released under judicial supervision by the
Tribunal de Créteil. An eleventh suspect had already been released.
On
September 6, 2018, these defendants will be tried.
Their
lawyers want to make sure that these facts are a "cross
violence" and subordinate the debates to the determination of
the initiators of this brawl.
What is a
political act of installation of an administrative authority distinct
from the public authority in a territory would thus be reclassified
as a disorder of ordinary law to public order.
It
suffices for it to be blind to the aim, the administrative occupation
of a territory, and to judge only the method, the fight between two
bands.
2) - The
concomitance of the facts
The
underlying ideology is that of the public inferiorization of certain
populations which by their nature could only produce lower-level
common-law clashes and which would not be capable enough to produce
the higher-order political fact.
We
already have exactly the same debate about Mr. Benzema pending
judgment.
In
Clairefontaine, stadium of the national team, this selected player
transmits to a player of the French team the racket orders of a civil
thug.
a-
Selected in France team, he is a state agent and the official Stadium
is a place of the State.
b- He transmits to another official of the State, on an official site of the State, the orders of a civil thug.
b- He transmits to another official of the State, on an official site of the State, the orders of a civil thug.
This is
the very definition of the mafia action.
At the
same time as Mr. Benzema officiated, 300 people from public life and
the municipal administration were on trial in Rome.
All these
characters, in all respects, did nothing but communicate or implement
the orders of the civilian thugs who paid them, were of their family
or friends.
They were
doing service. The Italian administration is on the floor.
As in the
case of Booba and Kaaris, the advocates of Mr. Benzema continue to
infantilize and explain that as a "young city" he can not
want to bribe agents of the state. That would be too important for
him.
These
authentic racists base their reasoning on a colonial ideological
regression. They cry racism against the French who want to keep one
of the most valuable assets of our society that is an indivisible and
honest administration.
Both
cases are similar. They constitute a project to impose parallel to
the public administration a separate administration for populations
defined distinctly in racial terms.
Justice
must recognize these people's ability to participate in political
struggles to participate in the definition and exercise of public
authorities, what is called politics and in this case a factious
policy to fight the Republic.
The
French have many reasons to be worried about this. They are waiting
to see.
3) - The
action
Now that
the mortgage of the pre-trial detention is lifted; it is possible to
think serenely about the stakes of the trial.
In the
manner of cowboys discovering a new Saloon where to impose the
prerogatives of their omnipotence; the defendants had no preconceived
idea in engaging in this riot.
They
mechanically extended the possibilities of communitarian clashes to
new public spaces. They settle their accounts where they are as they
wish.
However,
this time they installed the demonstration of their power and their
grabbing of a territory in a place of passage of the leading cadres
which became, since September 11, 2001, a strategic place of the
security of the States.
They
imposed the same public terror as in the cities and commercial
centers of the Ile-de-France; but at Orly airport.
It
follows that the French are no longer the only ones silently
observing the capacity of French state agents to deal with this
political crime.
For
example, the American leaders, who finance the communitarianism of
the suburbs where these gentlemen come from, will doubtless examine
whether France is a country capable of controlling its frontier
places in the United States.
The
French and the foreign officials concerned will therefore appreciate
the trial on only one of its components and it is not the quantum of
sentences that will hold their attention.
The
public judicial challenge will be to know if these defendants are
arrested at the hearing to execute their sentence or if they stand
out free to follow the meanders of a judicial procedure made for the
millionaires that they are.
If they
stand out from the audience, it will mean that they have won. Indeed,
in this case, whatever the legitimate concerns of the magistrates,
the political fight of the defendants has been legally reclassified
in common law. It will be somehow gone from crime to contravention.
This will
be the beginning of the "crossed" adventures in French
airports, the international disqualification of these, a new defeat
for France, a further cut for the French.
Randomly
; last night, the subway train in which I was was blocked because a
fight between travelers was conducted, organized, in the previous
train. The controllers refused any idea of intervening in this
case. They are afraid.
As the
press reported, this trial will be closely followed.
Marc
SALOMONE
Email: salomone.marc@neuf.frblog:
madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris, Monday,
August 6, 2018
REFLECTION ON
THE "CROSS VIOLENCE" OF TWO ETHNIC BANDS AT ORLY AIRPORT.
Wednesday, August 1st, 2018.
1)- Preamble
On Wednesday,
August 1, 2018, the two accompanying rappers, Booba and Kaaris,
clashed violently inside the secure area of Orly airport. Both
artists took a plenary part. They were assisted by their associates,
eleven of whom were arrested.
They are all
placed in custody on Wednesday, August 1. They are presented to the
court for immediate appearance on Friday, August 3. The Tribunal
decides that the trial is postponed to Thursday, September 6, 2018
and that the defendants are all subject to a warrant of committal for
remand.
There are two
directions in dealing with this case.
1- Or, the
magistrates consider them as common law cases, individual excesses
which on this occasion occur in a space frequented by honest people.
This is called a fight.
2- Or, they
consider them political coups. The dangerous fight then becomes a
conquest of territory. This is called a factious enterprise.
The
characterization of the facts of "cross-violence" by the
Prosecutor of the Republic allows either to get lost in the statement
of crossings or to grasp the logic of a common offensive.
2) - The Fight
1- The type
This general
fight would be a fight. We give ourselves an appointment, we go for
it, we go back home.
In this case,
this Fight would emerge from the public performance of the usual
aggressiveness of rappers between them.
His only fault
would have been in an inappropriate place.
2- The
legitimate place
These Fights
would be cultural if they are held in popular places, called suburbs,
and reprehensible if they are embedded in the instruments of
circulation of the ruling classes, such as an airport.
3) - The
supporters of the Fight
The reduction
of the confrontation to a conflict of common law out of its
legitimate jar is supported involuntarily by three distinct sources.
1- The lawyers
of the parties
They have
professionally interests so that the judicial debate is organized
starting from the search of the personal responsibilities of the
protagonists.
Their stated
purpose on television is to prove that their client was the assaulted
and therefore the victim.
2-
Representatives of rappers in the media.
According to
them, this affair adds a stone to the public bag of a musical style
that certainly suffers from the public ranting of its participants.
They are right
to support their profession and to demonstrate at the same time that
this violence has other reasons than music.
However, to do
this they feed the media ritornello building the usual scenario of
the band of young cities uncultivated and agitated.
3- The
procedure
The Fight
hypothesis is also supported by the inquiry procedure itself. The
primary concern of the investigators is who did what and in
particular who started.
On arrival,
there will remain only the uncertainties of the genesis and the few
certainties of the filmed identification of some fighters.
4- The result
In doing so,
the procedure and other actors of the proceedings (lawyers, police
officers, rappers, etc.) serve the protagonists of the Fight.
Indeed, the
servile follow-up of the turns and detours of this confrontation
installs the verbiage of the castagneurs at the Direction of the
judgment. The Tribunal becomes the stooge, the justice of the peace,
protagonists.
5- Renewal
By
organizing the trial on this agreed idea of gang brawl, the
state is preparing to repeat the same analysis at the next Fight and
the next one.
This accommodating management of the Fights inevitably leads to their
repetition, their installation, the integration of their
administrative potential in the organization chart of the airport.
4) - The
Judicial Risks of the Fight
The magistrates
will be intractable on the reimbursements of the expenses incurred.
There will undoubtedly be penalties that will cover pre-trial
detention and suspended sentences in case these artists come up with
the foolish idea of resuming this occupation of a coded
territory.
1- On the one
hand, money will trade and there is no shortage. Especially since the
civil plaintiffs (Paris Airport and Duty-free) are very
accommodating.
2- On the other
hand, these artists have no intention of starting again.
3- As for their
henchmen, they do not care about these judicial abuses.
These people
indeed include arrests and scandals in their actions. The lawyers are
there to adjust these in the official frameworks.
The media even
constantly evokes the hypothesis of a media coup on the part of the
two rappers.
On a video, we
can see a big guy under arrest who seems to be one of two artists
continue to do in front of police inert warlike gestures of
provocation against the enemy. He knows how to make the difference
between the essence of chaos and the scum of official procedures.
5) - The
conquest
This
confrontation must be taken for what it is: a political act. Even if
it is a policy of influence, while waiting better.
This is so
because it aims at the definition, the training, the exercise of the
public authorities; public order is one of them.
This political
struggle is not immediately understandable for the French for whom
politics is a matter of inset parties seeking to seize power by
elections, or dreaming of the use of force, in order to govern.
The influential
parties want to invest the places of power without necessarily
exercising it in title.
The Italian
mafia can serve as a reference. The mafia do not want a municipality
wearing the colors of the mafia. They want a municipality that
satisfies the mafia on the issues that concern it.
We can compare
these fights to those of bars. They are of two types:
1- The fights
that are quarrels of drunk customers who break everything to let off
steam from the hardships of their lives.
2- Those
organized by the mafia who want to terrorize both the owners and the
customers.
3- In this
case, the stake is not to let off steam but to make it clear to the
keeper that he must pay the Pizzo, to the customers that they must be
silent, to the forces of the order which they must stick to the
observation of incomprehensible "cross-violence".
These ethnic
bands do not want to run the airport. They only want to install
gradually, by keys, in the functional landscape of the airport.
We will soon
learn that the border police can no longer enter baggage sorting
centers and that the distribution of tickets is controlled by
elements outside the relevant services.
This fight is
also to reconcile press information on the existence in the airport
of ethnic networks tracking the rich passengers and their looting on
the highway.
Through
cultural knowledge networks; the bands are starting to feel at home
and their leaders want to extend the authority to extend the
influence zones into the airport.
6) - The
natural slope
Insensibly,
without departing from the scrupulous follow-up of the procedure
which chops the meaning and transforms it into details of facts,
justice will organize the disqualification of politics in facts of
common law.
For decades,
judges have proceeded in so-called spaces, suburbs, neighborhoods,
etc.
As a result,
the inhabitants of the places where these criminals are suffering
undergo both their diktats and the incapacity of justice to name the
public facts of this policy of conquest.
With regard to
what she calls imperturbably common law violence; justice has
successively repressed, reprimanded, channeled, legitimized,
organized political violence.
The Theo Luhaka
case incidentally taught us that the state was giving 700,000 euros
to a family to ensure public order instead of the police force,
solely because of the ethnic characterization of this family.
In the Nantes
case, describing the facts as "the death of a 22-year-old"
and not the "death of a wanted criminal in a state of
recidivism", the magistrates legalized the ideology of the
rioters factious.
They say they want to set limits to the action of this type of
scoundrels and guarantee them that there will be no follow-up if they
do not leave. These limits have been for over thirty years of true
rights of cuissage limited and extensible to infinity on the
inhabitants.
The only result
of this sleepwalking policy is first the trivialization of terror in
the territories they control.
1- These
territories have been named since 2000: "The lost territories of
the Republic".
2- In 2017, in
a city of Marseille, the Chief of a police patrol said: "No, we
do not go there, they are at home. We go through the small exit not
to annoy them. We too would not accept that they come to us. "
3- A petition was published on April 21, 2018, in Le Parisien, saying
that 50,000 suburban Jews had to leave their homes and their cities.
4- Tens of
thousands of other French people have done the same.
1- This is what
the petitioners call "low-noise ethnic cleansing".
2- This
questions us about the political reasons for the cowardice with which
these two populations are expropriated with so much submission.
This is exactly
the question that judges face in the Orly airport case. They must say
whether they submit to the false pretenses of villainous appearances
or whether they judge the reality of a political offensive.
7) - The change
of place
Magistrates do
not care and continue to treat ethnic-religious clashes as a fight
between young people and rival gangs, and not for what they are, that
is, territorial conquest processes.
Control of
public order allows participation in the property.
This is so
because these territories primarily concern workers and employees in
which magistrates do not recognize themselves.
The interest of
the Orly affair is that this strategy of territorial conquest,
because that is what it is about, goes to the next stage.
Not only, it
takes place in a strategic location of the state that is an airport
but it concerns the social classes in which the magistrates recognize
themselves. They can say: I could have been there.
8) - Pre-trial
detention
The detention
in remand of persons who are also personalities informs us on the
estimate of the violence of the facts by the public authorities.
It is by the
risk of the resumption of these "cross-violence" that the
Tribunal has given priority to the detention warrant.
This measure is
not an installment on the decisions of the trial. It can not
therefore engage in reflections on the responsibilities that will
accompany it.
9) - The issue
of sentences
The facts
having happened in Orly, it is in the eyes of the whole world that
justice will organize its action and render a judgment. The
magistrates will not only have to deal with French people, but they
despise them.
In their
judgment, the magistrates will surely take into account the
complexity of the situation.
Nevertheless,
if they masked the showdown with the public authorities by means of
this "cross-violence" as a determining element of the
facts, they would hide the essential. They would miss the march on a
strategic issue.
The decisive
criterion for judicial action that will take into account the
priority of the policy in this case is the presence or not of a
prison sentence with a warrant of committal at the hearing.
The latter will
indicate that it is up to the factious thugs to present their
arguments not to execute their sentence and not to the courts to
justify the value of the judgment.
10) –
Conclusion
If the
magistrates renew the ideology of the Fight, the French will suffer
in silence this new defeat.
If the
magistrates indicate that this "cross violence" has had the
concern to define public order and if they restore the indivisibility
of the state, it will be a hope for the French.
Everyone is
waiting.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire