Marc Salomone / Blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The two forms, ed. Amazon.
Paris, Thursday, December 9, 2021
REFLECTION ON THE SETTLEMENT OF WOMEN IN THE REGULAR ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SOCIETY
1) - Sisyphus and Helena
1- The law
The public debate fixes the place of the debates concerning the sexes in the perimeter of the law and the regulations.
Today, it is clear that Parliament, the government and the judiciary are chasing the sporadic fires of conflicts of both sexes without any, or their combined action, being able to extinguish any lastingly.
Violence against women, stubborn professional and salary inequalities, inequalities in career, situation, power, wealth, inequalities in hope, are dealt with following their sporadic and unpredictable manifestations.
The defense of women's rights is currently part of the logic of the myth of Sisyphus.
2- the constitution
The accumulation of rules, jurisprudences, social activities, certainly faces concrete problems, but it also serves to mask, compensate, replace, and perhaps hide, the absence of general regulation of the question posed by this myriad of 'inadmissible, intolerable and insoluble events.
These myriads of independent events are not soluble in particular laws because they depend on a general law.
Indeed, the repetition of feminicides, the continuity of rapes by the powerful, the inequalities of treatment between the sexes, indicate that these particular cases come under a general subject.
However, this generality is lacking in the public debate.
Its absence renders legal and social action ineffective, paralyzes it, disqualifies it by its impotence.
This debate is not resolved in the sum of particular actions because it comes under general action, ie constitutional law.
Replacing these particular fights in their generality is the object of this reflection.
3- The emergency
a- This replacement of the question of women's rights in the constitutional sphere is all the more urgent given that gender relations, as evidenced by the Mila affair or the Afghan tragedy, are expressly included in current socio-political developments.
b- Whether in questions of mass migration, administrative organization charts, in the ordinary of work or couple relations, the question of the relations of the two sexes is decisive.
c- The specificity of our time is that this question has become politically crucial.
d- Hélène has once again become a reason for war.
e- The novelty is now that Hélène no longer waits for Hector. She fights; solitary.
2) - The Patriarchate
The codification of this generality will not solve everything and will even reveal other subjects which are hidden behind the current particularisms.
On the other hand, it will install the company, French in this case, on foundations which will erase, will make obsolete, will make forget, the inequalities of principle which produce the activists of their implementation.
Indeed, the killers of women, the social rapists, the discriminators, are first and foremost voluntary civil servants of an invisible administration that the current feminists call the "Patriarchy".
It doesn't matter what it may mean for ethnologists. The term has become political, therefore public.
The political Patriarchate is first and foremost a global ideological system which is inscribed in the laws, regulations, legal and administrative provisions, blocks their developments, and perpetuates the public legitimization of archaic references to social, individual, family, and social behavior. all the more unbearable as they are obsolete.
Ordinary relationships, such as family or work relationships, are the mucus of this administrative ideology.
Two anecdotes:
a- In 1946, the Constitution enshrined the legal equality of both sexes.
b- In 2000, a bailiff of the Chamber of Deputies tried to deny access to the debate amphitheater to a deputy because she was in trousers, the wearing of which was then still prohibited for women by the regulations.
c- In 2021, a kitchen team (of twelve people including five cooks) and a ministry team is practicing what case law calls “sexual and homophobic harassment of the environment”. cf. The Chained Duck of 08,12,21, p.4.
One of the cooks said to the diver and the only woman on the team: "And you, do you have a fat pussy?" ".
Faced with the denunciation by the latter supported by another diver, the team united and obtained the dismissal of the aforementioned and her report to the Public Prosecutor, for "conspiracy".
This implies that the witness diver changes his mind at the appropriate time and that the control bodies come together in a secular, medieval, repugnant way:
a- "Systematically salacious humor" of the team, of its leader, can be amended,
b- The “plot” of the diver is proven and reprehensible.
c- These anecdotes reflect the normality of machismo in daily parliamentary and corporate life.
d- We are not going to make a law a day for each chauvinist diarrhea.
So :
The race for specific measures is the continuation of the past.
The end of the Patriarchal system is the order of the day.
3) - The change of law
It is time to destabilize this global administrative policy by erasing its places of legal organization.
Of course, the end of the organizational domination of the masculine reference over the feminine reference will not put an end to the inequalities which undoubtedly have many other sources.
But precisely, this domination subordinates all the others and prevents them from showing themselves. As long as it subsists our society is doomed to wade through this insanitary swamp of effects with multiple and incomprehensible causes which is the form of the Patriarchate land.
This domination has become morally and socially unbearable. The social clothes of both sexes are no longer to be mended but to be changed.
The presidential election debate is required to lead to a change in the law.
4) - The obstacle
This possibility is also current because it is already registered in the public debate.
Indeed, constitutional and legislative debates have already established the two sexes in legal equality (1946), personal equality (1974), parity (1999).
This provision became constitutional in 1999.
So, with the three constitutional laws, or of such value, French society should no longer oppose any obstacle to equality of the sexes, respect for their persons, the equal participation of all.
However, each one notes that this is not the case and that it is necessary to accumulate the laws to compensate for an absence which is precisely that of the equal social value of the two sexes.
This lack does not come from an absence of legal device but from the constitutional device itself.
The abolition of the Patriarchate is the establishment of the legal, joint, equal, universal presence of both sexes in all activities of organization and management of society.
Today, what hinders the abolition of the Patriarchate is the constitutional law, that of 1999.
It is supposed to have started the process of the abolition of the Patriarchate.
In fact, it renewed it while occupying the ground for its abolition and thus blinds the public debate.
5) - Competitive parity
1- The law of 1999
The 1999 Constitution Act adds two articles to the Constitution.
Art. 1, paragraph 2: "The law promotes equal access of women and men to electoral mandates and elective functions, as well as to professional and social responsibilities. "
Art. 4, paragraph 2: "They contribute to the implementation of the principle set out in the second paragraph of Article 1 under the conditions determined by law. "
2- Comment
The main quality of this constitutional law is to establish competition between the sexes as a constitutional and therefore legal principle.
a- It thus relays all the false debates on the possible incompetence of women, their recurrent inadequate training, their ritual disinterest in the positions concerned, the possible superiority (circumstantial of course) of men.
b- In principle both sexes are present on an equal basis, this is Parity.
c- In fact, one of the two sexes already occupies all the positions and it has the constitutional competence to choose the elements of the other sex that it deems capable of asserting it.
d- Take patience, prove
yourself, everything comes at the right time for those who know how
to wait.
e- It offers a place for the equal presence of the two
sexes and a place for the precedence and in fact for the
organizational domination of one sex over the other.
Guess which one.
In any case, she does not answer the question asked by the murderers of women who care little about the chabada lists but very much about the precedence of male authority and the respect that is due to him.
6) - Parity of law
The only valid answer to the question asked is that of equal rights.
1- The reform
a- Art. 1, paragraph 2 is deleted
b- Art. 4, paragraph 2 is retained
b- Art. 3, paragraph 5 is added:
“The public powers, the deliberative assemblies, their directions, the directions having a social activity, are constituted by the joint, equal, universal presence, of right, of the two sexes. "
The legal experts concerned examine the first part of the article.
The second part is a block.
2- The effects
a- Women no longer have to prove.
b- Both sexes are present everywhere, as of right, where decisions of a public nature are taken.
c- The changes:
For the elective assemblies and the governing bodies which depend on them, the consequences are immediate at each election.
For all organizations dependent on the state, its delegations and its funding, the reform is becoming a topical statutory object.
For the institutions, Parliament is responsible for drawing up a reform plan.
For this and that, the reform under the direction of the Parliament and the government, organizes its programming.
3- disintegration
Women and all democrats are waiting for this provision which will establish women by right in all spheres of social organization.
Of course, legislative and regulatory action will not take place in a day, or even in a term of office.
But everyone will then understand that henceforth the primacy of the male moral reference is no longer either dominant, legal or a public reference.
The same applies to the provisions which codify, endorse and extend it.
All arrangements will be made on the basis of gender parity.
There will no longer be any social hold on which to hang the Patriarchate.
Public actions will accelerate its disintegration.
4- The reference
To get an idea of the change that Parity of Law will bring, it is possible to refer to another change in administrative policy.
The role of legal parity can be compared to that of the transition from royal administration to public administration.
Before 89, the King's officials had to subordinate their energy to the financing of the feudal and royal lifestyle.
The road network was as bad as it was in the 18th century as it was in the 15th.
After 89, the same people could devote their energy to the Nation.
The 19th century, particularly brutal in its class clashes, organized the entire road, rail, postal, school, administrative, etc. network.
7) - The elections
The harshness of the times to come foreshadows storms in the public debate.
The inclusion of this constitutional reform in a candidate's program would impose the primacy of this theme over others.
It would refocus the debate on national unity on the ground of fraternity and democracy.
It would install the actions to come in an obligation of modernity for all.
It would include parity in all civil strategies.
He would make voting compulsory during the next term of office.
It would be his “Abolition of the death penalty”.
All candidates will be forced to take a stand and appear either behind or in line.
Currently, the candidates rely on the fear inspired by the other and the voters vote according to their own productions of fears.
By this proclamation, the candidate would capture hopes. He would have the beautiful role of opening Democracy.
Voters would have the satisfaction of voting positively for the only candidate who took the initiative to put an end to an obsolete and necessarily unjust logic of association of the two sexes and to install another open to justice and efficiency. .
Whatever his program, and therefore the inevitable confrontations to come, he would have the certainty of being able to govern. This is not obvious to any of the candidates in the running.
Indeed, today, for these elections:
a- The electoral mechanics will produce a winner.
b- The uncertainty of legitimacy will raise the question of its capacity to govern.
With few words, it would generate great effects.
8) – Conclusion
The question of equality of the sexes and of their joint, equal, legal, universal presence in the organization of public powers, of the family, of national cohesion, becomes decisive.
Those who oppose it no longer seek to hide the issue, on the contrary, they make it their bloody flag.
The legal parity of the sexes becomes an element of the constitutionality of the government.
Finally, turn the page.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire