Paris, Friday, December 1, 2017
Part 1: French text / Part 2:
English text, Google translation
Copy :
1- President of the French
Republic
2- European Commission
3- UN
4- Embassies: Australia, North
Korea (Bern), South Korea, China, European, Japan, Russia, USA.
5- Speakers of Parliament and
French parliamentary groups
Reflection on the international
political debates after the sending of a nuclear missile by North Korea,
29.11.17.
See previous posts on
Madic50.blogspot.com
1-11.08.17
2- 29.08. 17
3- 03.09.17
4-5.09.17
5- 10.09.17
6- 15.09.17
7-18.09.17
8-20.09.17
9- 23.09.17
10-24.09.17
11-28.09.17
12-9.10.17
INTELLECTUAL OBSTRUCTION
Korea is again the subject of
international tension after a nuclear missile strike by North Korea on November
29, 2017.
Immediately, the same
ideological rituals take action and everyone finds his place.
It is clear that nothing
changes and that the protagonists do nothing.
Fools are considering a new war
without collateral damage as a solution to the problem. This
ritornello is exactly the place of what the doctors of old called Saignée (a "bleeding")
The protagonists fail to
coordinate their efforts because they base their reasoning and their proposals
on chimeras.
a- When only one side imposes
its law, these sides are swept away by the crushing of the recalcitrant.
b- It turns out that today the
situation has fortunately become complex and that no one can crush the other.
The media speak of North Korea
as if it were self-evident.
North Korea and South Korea
have only a relative existence.
a- If it is a matter of
situating geographically state realities, these two "Koreas" exist.
b. If it is a question of
naming States and acting with them in this respect; the two
"Koreas" do not exist.
The historical reality named
Korea was divided into two military-political camps on July 27, 1953, in
Panmunjeom.
When we speak since 1953 of
these two Koreas have actually talked about these two camps.
These two camps have three
functions:
a- Manage their own camp
b- Prepare reunification under
his authority
c- Prevent the other side from
dominating the reunification
These three founding functions
are inseparable.
For convenience, these camps
have named the state military, political, economic, implemented to achieve
these goals.
We can not therefore be in
favor of Panmunjeom's policy of sharing and reunification and at the same time
blame the two sides for developing the consequences.
To discuss with the states of
North Korea and South Korea, they must first be built.
To build them, it is necessary
to renounce to consider them like the masks of military-political camps whose
aim is Reunification for their benefit.
This implies for foreign powers
to renounce their ambitions of conquest by the action of a third party.
It is therefore necessary to
bring the parties together to:
1- To consecrate the States in
place and place of the Camps.
2- Renounce all forms of
reunification
3- Resume the discussions on
the 1968 NPT, signed at the time by the two "Koreas".
This is not the first time
Korea has split into sovereign states. She will return to the path of unity
later and without the help of others.
To pretend that we are going to
replace reflection, politics, diplomacy, with the gris-gris of
"sanction", "pressure", "destruction", is an
aberration that has already lost precious time to the
international community.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire