Blog: madic50.blogspot.com /
Book: The two forms, Amazon.
Paris, Sunday, January 14, 2018
Part 1: French text / Part 2:
English text, Google translation
Copy :
1- President of the French
Republic
2- European Commission
3- UN
4- Embassies: Australia, North
Korea (Bern), South Korea, China, European, Japan, Russia, USA.
5- Speakers of Parliament and
French parliamentary groups
REFLECTION ON THE ILLUSIONS OF
THE RECOVERY OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO CORES, January 9, 2018.
See previous articles on
madic50.blogspot.com
1-11.08.17
2- 29.08. 17
3- 03.09.17
4-5.09.17
5- 10.09.17
6- 15.09.17
7-18.09.17
8-20.09.17
9 to 23.09.17
10-24.09.17
11-28.09.17
12-9.10.17
13-12.12.17
14-17.12.17
REFLECTION ON THE ILLUSIONS OF
THE RECOVERY OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO CORES, January 9, 2018.
1) - The illusion of encounters
The two Koreas meet on January
9, 2018 as they met before and they will divide again as before.
The good or the bad will of the
others is for nothing.
It is the very logic of their meeting that
provokes their inevitable separation that carries the next encounter
These meetings are based on the
illusions produced by the modalities of separation.
a- They are founders of the
division by legitimizing it by the prospect of Reunification.
b- They organize both division and
reunification.
By this pendulum from one to
the other, they carry on endlessly the logic of the armistice which is that of
the installation of the state of war in civil forms and the impossibility of
peace.
2) - The two chimeras
The two chimeras produced by
the armistice of July 27, 1953, are the Reunification and the two States which
must contribute to it. Neither of these political and
ideological realities have any reality.
1- The two states
Today, these two states do not
exist.
They are the public ghosts, the presentable
diplomatic figures, of these two military-political camps to which the
Armistice has granted to each a separate territory and its sovereign
management.
2- Reunification
Reunification is the
continuation, under the civil form codified by the 1953 Armistice, of the
unification war waged in military form from June 1950 to July 1953.
In both cases the logic of unification is that of subjection from one side to the other.
By gaining access to a stable
nuclear weapon, becoming a nuclear power, North Korea has rendered obsolete all
the hopes of reunification for the benefit of the Southern camp.
South Korea may also fear that
the North camp is gradually integrating its nuclear power into its ordinary
relations with that of the South.
In fact, each side is happy
that its raison d'être, the domineering reunification, is the public logic of
the relations of the two camps and the powers that support them.
3) - The obscurantist
misunderstanding
There is, however, a
misunderstanding between the Koreans and the Western powers.
This blindness prohibits any change in the
thinking of States.
1- Westerners
Western powers act as if they
still dominate the world.
But the most visible aspect of
this new Korean crisis is that the West no longer has the capacity to impose
its law on any of the two Koreas; nor to North Korea nor to South
Korea.
The United States has not been able to prevent North Korea's accession to nuclear weapons, nor can it manipulate South Korea as an armed arm.
Westerners still think they
dominate in Asia as they are more and more arrogant supplementers, mercenary
potentates, Asian states in their internal conflicts.
2- The two Koreas
This is not the first time that
Korea has split into two distinct and sovereign states.
The Koreans know how to handle this
conflictuality.
The two Koreas know that they
are part of the Asian ensemble whose place in the world will be decisive in the
21st century.
It follows that none of the two
Koreas will agree to be the mop of calculations of the Western party.
If Westerners want to transform
their secular, conflictual and beneficial presence into a globalized society,
they must admit to working with Korean people as they are.
4) - The Armistice
On 9 July 1953, in Panmunjeom,
the parties in question established a so-called Armistice doctrine according to
which two military-political camps divide Korea territorially and have a
diplomatic rank of State.
By the Armistice both sides
take note of the impossibility for a camp to win the military victory. They renew their goals of
hegemonic reunification under civil forms.
Everything that emerges from
the management of the Armistice reduces the primacy of the two camps to the
state forms and maintains the competition of these two camps to achieve
reunification for their benefit.
The reconciliations between the
two Koreas are therefore products of the device that separates them so that
this rapprochement leads to the defeat of the one and the victory of the other.
US military maneuvers with
South Korea, as well as North Korea's atomic armament, are the conditions for
the normal functioning of the balance of antagonisms organized by the
Armistice.
5) - The constructive
renunciations of the two Koreas
To get out of the current
confrontation and the risks of nuclear war, it is necessary to get out of the
operating rules of the armistice.
This requires constructive
renunciation.
We must abandon the objectives
of the two military-political camps and take note of the uselessness of these
two camps.
The two states, hitherto
subordinated to the two Armistice Camps, must cease to be the pretense of these
camps.
They must take precedence over
their partisan origin and proclaim their outer and inner sovereignty.
This sovereignty manifests
itself in the abandonment of the partisan aims of the two camps and thus of
Reunification as a state and a government affair.
Consequently :
a- Each Korean State ceases to
apply to the population of the other State.
b) These States are prohibited
from putting in place any modality of sovereign intervention whatsoever, from
its territory, towards the other Korean State.
c- The demarcation line becomes
a frontier.
Having become sovereign, the
two Korean states are resuming TPN talks, to which they have both already
adhered. All the administrative channels
of this discussion are already in place.
All these questions are the subject
of treaties.
6) - The constructive
renunciations of the Allied Powers.
All this seems obvious to the
lonely observer and terribly complicated to the executives of the concerned
states, Korean or otherwise.
Indeed, all the States
concerned by this conflict have established their respective diplomatic logics
on the rules of the Armistice and therefore those of the continuation of the
war by other means.
The permanent tension of
reunification and division is routine.
They must get out of this
intellectual comfort included in all the geostrategies of these powers.
The rules of peace entail for each of them considerable abandonment in terms of geostrategic manipulations.
By becoming a strategic goal,
the requirement that Koreans live in peace influences the calculations of the
Powers.
7) - The future of Europe
The United States is a country
bordering the Pacific Ocean and they have settled on the Silk Road. As such, they will continue to be present in
Asia.
The Europeans have already let
themselves be expelled from all work with the republics of the Soviet Union; from Kiev to Vladivostok.
If in addition they do not know
how to leave the Armistice of 1953 to work in common with the two Koreas; they will also exclude
themselves from Asian history.
There are certain realities on
which the average and the powerful should be able to speak the same language.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire