Book: "The two forms", Amazon
/ madic50.blogspot.com
Paris, Wednesday, February 13, 2019
CONTRIBUTION (8) TO THE NATIONAL DEBATE
WISHED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC IN 2019.
THE SUBSTITUTION OF THE PORTRAIT OF
SIMONE VEIL TO THAT OF MARIANNE AND THE MEDIA OMERTA ON RACIST AND
ANTI-SEMITARIAN CRIMINALITIES (Continuation of the reflection n ° 6
of February 8th, 2019, see: madic50)
1) - The facts
Criminals inscribe a swastika on the
picture of Simone Veil printed by the post office on one of his
street mailboxes.
This act goes hand in hand with the
announcement of a substantial increase in anti-Semitic acts.
Among the proposals to stop these
criminal acts, two solutions are presented as obvious:
1- It is proposed that the face of
Simone Veil become that of the Marianne des Mairies.
2- Create a media coverage of
anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, and other message aggression.
1) - The portrait of Simone Veil
Marianne is the embodiment of the
French population; in other words, all women and all men.
No French must be able to say that he
does not recognize himself in the portrait of this bust.
Therefore Marianne can have neither a
name nor a story. One can always interview the woman who posed, she
must nonetheless be a woman among others.
To adopt the portrait of Simone Veil as
that of Marianne is to identify Marianne with a particular woman with
a singular destiny for her heroism and her specific belonging to a
fraction of the People.
Inevitably, all the fractions of the
people who claim to be victims will sooner or later claim their turn.
There are hundreds.
There is no reason for Marianne to be a
woman, and so on.
Article 1 of the Constitution states:
"France is an indivisible, secular, democratic and social
Republic. It ensures equality before the law of all citizens without
distinction of origin, race or religion. She respects all beliefs.
Its organization is decentralized. "
The irresponsibility of those who want
to suppress the indistinction of the races can not lead to the
organization of the distinction of races and religions.
The anonymity of Marianne and Article 1
of the Constitution are instead the basis of an effective fight
against anti-Semitism.
In this connection, I note that if the
magistrates did not cover any racism, for example that against the
French, they would work against all racism.
2) - The omerta
Those who want to organize the media
silence about racist attacks, whoever they are, are either
incompetent or accomplices or actors.
1- The incompetent
French information is of poor quality.
It is already based on manipulation and censorship.
In addition, we would like to formalize
the disinformation at the shelter of which thrives the crime.
2- The accomplices and the actors
This is also why the media delegates of
the attackers and their supporters demand such censorship in the name
of morality, as always, and on the pretext of not heroising the
aggressors.
The freedom of information has been
precisely built because the omerta experience is always worse than
the swirl created by information.
France is not a Third World country and
the French are citizens and not subjects. Their information is right.
In both cases, serious situations are
exploited unduly to violate the constitutional principles of Liberty
and Equality.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire