blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The
Two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris, Tuesday, June 11, 2019
CONTRIBUTION (24) TO THE NATIONAL
DEBATE WISHED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC IN 2019.
THE RETURN OF THE JIHADISTS (14), THE
OFFENSIVE OF THE PRO-JIHADISTS OF FRANCE AND THE FORMATION OF TWO
CAMPS. (Continuation of the reflection n ° 13 of June 4th, 2019, cf:
madic50)
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
1. Preamble
There is no one in France to defend the
rights of the mentally handicapped who are judged as valid persons.
On the other hand, what cackling to
defend the rights of the unfortunate person of jihadist criminals
taken prisoner!
The campaign cleverly and powerfully
orchestrated to bring back the jihadists to be tried in France for
secondary crimes and released soon, (because in fact their fight
would be if not just justified at least) adapts, continues and s
'intensifies.
The death sentence of several French
jihadists has given it a new source of inspiration and a search for
legitimacy. From now on, their supporters no longer only defend
innocent people wrongly accused and prevented from proving their good
faith. They call to rescue men, women, even children, who want to be
murdered.
2) - The first assault
Initially, the arguments focused on the
inability of local justices, of lower qualification, to judge lords
such as French citizens.
The only officially competent justices
are those of the places of commission of the crimes; in this case,
Syria and Iraq.
The purpose of the first offensive is
to make it admitted as a public fact that these two states, and by
extension those of the South, are incapable of exercising justice.
3) - The States
The first disqualification is aimed at
the two states themselves
1- Syria
a- The exclusion of the right
France still does not want to restore
diplomatic relations with the Syrian state, which in its eyes no
longer exists. The denial of the facts and of several years of war
does not change this bias.
In this judicial debate, Syria is
represented by Syrian Kurdistan and arrests by Kurdish and Arab
fighters of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).
(SDS: Largely dominated by the Kurds of
the People's Protection Units (YPG), the SDF also includes Arab
rebels close to the Free Syrian Army, local tribes such as the
Al-Sanadid Army and Christians of the Syriac Military Council .
The SDS is actively supported by the
US-led international coalition that provides them with trainers,
weapons and air support.)
This representation only shifts the
question of the lack of representativity.
Indeed, Syrian Kurdistan is a Syrian
administrative district and not a sovereign state. No international
authority recognizes the quality of forming justice.
Outside everyone!
b- The report
So, all the trick of the European
support of the jihadists is to qualify the defendants as combatants
on Syrian soil and to make it known by the opinion that the Syrian
justice and its Kurdish substitute are considered by the
international community as legally illegal.
It follows that the jihadists can only
be repatriated to France to be judged legally.
Because, you see, the right just the
right all right! It's beautiful like the Antique!
2- Iraq
France recognizes Iraq since this state
is supposed to be under American rule.
However, Western discourse presents the
justice of a state that exists in its eyes (Iraq) as finally having
no more legality than that of a state that does not exist for the
Western party (Syria) .
This justice is immediately adorned
with two major technical flaws:
1- It is criminal
The procedure is a joke, torture is a
permanent "risk", the sentences are excessive and even
unjustified.
2- She is legally incompetent
The defendants were delivered to Iraq
by the Kurds who are in Syrian territory. The crimes were committed
as part of the Caliphate that straddles the two countries (Iraq and
Syria) and no one can say whether they are under Syrian or Iraqi
justice.
And that's good! Here too, the law ...
etc.
4) - The themes
The disqualification of the Iraqi
judiciary is also organized around its professional incapacity to
assume the tasks which it appropriates itself unduly.
I'm looking at three of these themes
here:
1- The Caliphate
The Iraqi judiciary would have
appropriated the defendants who do not depend on his authority since
they were arrested in Syria.
2- The death penalty
Western countries could not stand to
have their citizens sentenced to death. To accept this punishment
would suffocate European states with indignation and shame.
3- Torture
Among other things, the Iraqi justice
system is said to have failed to put the "risk" of torture
on the accused. This method of interrogation would simply be
incompatible with Western societies.
5) - Jurisdiction of Iraq for the
Caliphate
Iraq's declaration of competence for
the judgment of the crimes committed by the jihadists of the
Caliphate of Daesh is relevant.
1- The Caliphate was born in Iraq and
spread to Syria.
It is therefore supposed to claim that
the leaders of the Caliphate and their subordinates are subject to
the justice of the State from which they come. Their extension to
Syria is the overflow, expansion, subversion of Iraqi citizens.
2- The Caliphate is not straddling two
political states. It is the negation of these two political states
and their unity in a new anti-political and religious structure.
The jihadists do not cross a border to
find themselves in another country under the guise of their laws.
They want to break the law of each of
the political states (including France and the EU countries).
They seek to bend two countries to
their dictatorship by reducing them to a single space.
The Caliphate is not a state, it is a
borderless totality that holds its reality of the terror of its
functioning.
3- The caliphate can be overcome only
by destroying it in its unity, ie in its totality, independently of
the political boundaries that it covers and that as long as it exists
no longer exist.
It is by pursuing the jihadists in all
the space that they conquered and by exercising a right of justice
over all this space that the concerned states find their legal
borders.
It should be noted that while the Iraqi
state claims the capacity to try the jihadists of the whole
Caliphate, its military and judicial determination has not given rise
to any territorial claim, to any will to move the border between the
two states.
The military and judicial treatment of
this totality is the guarantee of the restoration of political
borders.
Recall by contrast, that there is
little western states were discussing a redrawing of the borders of
the region according to the expansion of the Caliphate.
Therefore, one can not blame the Iraqi
state for seizing the judgment of all the jihadists of the Caliphate.
6) - The death penalty
The sentencing of 10 jihadist criminals
to the death penalty has put this sentence at the center of the
debate.
The first and ordinary arguments are
the assertion that:
1- On the one hand, the death penalty
is an absolute monstrosity.
This quality is mentioned by Western
countries only in the case of a judgment.
The above apply the death penalty in a
thousand ways:
a- The criminal bombings of Libya are
still not tried.
b- In the curriculum of Grandes Ecoles,
students learn to predict deaths in the ordinary conduct of a
project.
It is therefore not absolutely certain
that this clause of illegality of the death penalty applies without
dispute for a country at war vis-à-vis those of its attackers who
intend to repeat their calls for massacres of civilians to resume the
course of its destruction.
The major problem that jihadists pose
to Western states is precisely the certainty that they will not want
to start again but to continue.
2- On the other hand, since France, the
European Union (EU), do not want Death Penalty at home, they can not
accept it outside their judicial system.
The death penalty would be a fault.
a- Sweden and England play a decisive
role in the court case for the return of Australian journalist Julian
Assange to US justice for criminal charges that include the death
penalty among possible punishments.
France refused to give him asylum. NGOs
are silent.
Australia does not show a crazy
requirement in the defense of its national.
Apparently, it does not bother anyone.
Suddenly, when it comes to criminals of
fascist wars, consciences wake up and proclaim themselves painful.
7) - Torture
The same goes for torture.
a- In France, the mentally handicapped
form 30% of the prisoners. Prison detention is already destructive
for the able-bodied. It is an equivalent of torture sessions for the
mentally ill.
b- The United States has outsourced the
torture of its defendants in several countries under the cover of
NATO.
Apparently, here too, it does not
bother anyone.
Only on the occasion of the defense of
Fascist war criminals judged by the justice of a Southern State that
the European lawyers, the Western NGOs, the northern Muslim parties,
remember the respect of the person of the litigants .
It was the jihadists who went to these
countries not to fight but to commit crimes.
8) - The second assault
The pronouncement of death sentences
has sounded like a response to the cultural colonialism of the
European pro-jihadist camarilla.
The Iraqi state can no longer be
declared, condescendingly, incompetent and non-existent since it
appears that it exists and that it judges.
Supporters of jihadists then move on to
another argument:
a- The Iraqi state becomes a diplomatic
enemy of France and Western countries because it would trap these
Western states.
b- This is so because the convictions
would in fact be fabrications of hostages for economic, diplomatic
and military negotiations with the countries of nationality of these
convicts.
Detaining Western nationals would
provide a means of pressure on Iraq.
c- The only way for France to protect
itself from it, to "hold hands", would be to repatriate the
jihadists of French nationality.
The pro-jihadist call in some way the
Iraqi state to transform the refusal of the return of the jihadists
in France as an instrument of blackmail against it.
Using action in Iraq to strike France
is exactly one of the major axes of Daesh policy.
One of the inputs to this reasoning is
the certainty of these people that apart from some Western countries,
the world is a legal, political, institutional vacuum.
Jihadists can walk around as they want.
There is no state before Western Europe or the United States.
The Iraqi state is of course a bunch of
savages unable to assume a state policy.
On the other hand, the European states
are cakes moms desperate to save their babies who have committed a
big mistake.
The basis of this reasoning is always
cultural colonialism and complicity.
a- We can not discuss seriously with
these countries because they do not really exist.
The jihadists are judged by criminals
worse than they. They had good reason to fight even if they committed
mistakes that remain to be proven.
c. The French State must not only
ensure the quality of the trials of jihadists. It must also ensure
their ability to continue a fight whose true leaders are their
enemies.
d- The State, the French Republic, the
French, all must be afraid, first and foremost. Politics, law,
opinion must be based on this fear.
If French diplomacy wants to go to bed,
she will go to bed. It will not be because of Iraq or the jihadists,
but only because of it.
We will see.
9) - The factious unit
Initially it comes as a simple civil
confrontation.
In fact, the civil accomplices of
jihadism participate in the caliphate's war against political states;
in the place that is theirs.
Their congenital link with the ideology
of jihad is their fight against secularism and the political and
non-religious form of the state, as it was defined publicly in Europe
by Luther from 1517 and in France in 1789 and 1905 .
Being outside the permanent military
battlefield, they can organize common fronts with so-called moderate
religious groups; such associations of families of detainees. This
gives their fight a pathetic and human turn.
They can also lead the fight of jihad
on the judicial front transforming criminals on the one hand into
victims of those who judge them in Iraq and on the other hand French
judges guaranteeing the impunity of jihadists vis-à-vis Southern
countries and their military vanguard status vis-à-vis the Muslim
populations of the North.
It is not the accused whose hypocrites
defend the rights. They ensure the continuity of the caliphate's
staff and do what they can to guarantee the continuation of their
crimes.
Moreover, they claim to defend these
criminals. In fact, they publicly demonstrate that they are engaged
in a continuing war. In the end, they are poor lawyers. But is it
their concern?
Their primary goal is to disarm the
Democrats in every way.
10) - Conclusion
Of course, the pro-jihadist offensive
in the French media debate leads to the formation of two camps; the
pros and the cons.
Both sides are involved in this war.
For now, the initiative comes back to the first.
They can win.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire