blog: madic50.blogspot.com / Book: The
Two forms, ed. Amazon
Paris, Wednesday, June 27, 2019
CONTRIBUTION (26) TO THE NATIONAL
DEBATE WISHED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC IN 2019.
THE ACCUSATION OF MOHAMED BEN SALMANE
(MBS) PRIME MINISTER OF SAUDI ARABIA BY AGNES CALAMARD IN A REPORT OF
THE UN.
(Continuation of the reflection n ° 25
of June 13th, 2019, cf .: madic50.blogspot.com)
LAW, MORALITY, POLITICS
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019, Chained
Duck, p.1, by the article "UN Sawed", informs us of the
conclusions of the report that Agnes Callamard has just given to
the UN.
Investigating the death of Saudi
journalist and opponent Jamal Khashoggi in Saudi Arabia's consulate
in Turkey, Agnes Callamard clarifies the premeditation and horror of the
facts she details.
Concluding on the responsibilities of
the State in whose consulate these facts occurred, she says:
"Deliberate, premeditated,
extrajudicial execution, for which the State of Saudi Arabia is
responsible under international human rights law";
She advocates:
1- An international criminal
investigation into the involvement of Mohamed Ben Salmane in view of
the "credible evidence" she has gathered.
2- A freezing of assets abroad of the
aforesaid.
For too long now, the use of the
informal and particularly random doctrine of "human rights"
is intrinsically linked to political militancy aimed at manipulating
legal procedures for political ends.
In the name of a political moralism
which is necessarily of variable geometry and a privatization of the
demand of justice, it is decided that it is necessary to change the
government of a country, to stigmatize its rulers, to dispose at
discretion of global administrative bodies, such as banking networks,
to break its leaders.
The strength of these maneuvers is to
mobilize good talkative souls. The creation of moral evidence is the
armature of a new totality that rallies as much as it submits.
It is for this double reason that the
Libyan government has been overthrown. It was in the name of moral
urgency and righteousness that the UN resolution was violated.
Everyone knows the chaos that resulted from what was presented as a
moral justice operation. No one claims this action.
This pretense of substituting the right
to politics has made impossible the agreement of the States on a
legal solution during the Syrian conflict which is following it.
Their inability to stop the carnage stems directly.
This time, it is Saudi Arabia which is
targeted on the pretext of the criminal classification of a state
executives action in the legal enclosure of this one. It is advocated
to seize the political leadership of this country and bring chaos by
sowing stigma.
It is up to this ad hoc commission of
the UN to build a comprehensive report of facts, to provide the
analysis, to inform the citizens of the world.
The UN report is forwarded to the
competent Saudi court in the case, which attaches it to the file of
which it is already aware.
On the other hand, it does not give
this commission in any way the capacity to destabilize the Saudi
government under cover of a civil and judicial action, targeting the
person of the Prime Minister.
If humanity has produced the form of
governmental organization it is also because the judicial form can
not replace it.
a- It must be said that the elimination
of this opponent was made outside the rules of law.
b- It must also be said that justice
can not be the substitute for questions and political responses that
do not come from the economic and social system concerned, his
nation.
Crime is part of the ordinary action of
states and governments.
Judging them for their crimes is not
the institutional transposition of the nerve crisis of personalities
horrified by the age-old practices of states.
The least we can say is that the thing
is not simple. The ad hoc judicial systems do not stand out from
their various and varied confrontations with this type of criminal
offense. Politics overflows them everywhere.
In law, this way of determining the
continuity of a national system from outside is called a Declaration
of War.
By claiming to circumvent the wishes of
the Saudis by the astute use of the judicial quarrel; the UN
rapporteur is part of a war sector whose name she does not
specifically mention.
What she wants to trigger is not the
legal hunt for an alleged murderer, it is a military offensive
legally masked in legal action.
She claims to name or reveal while she
covers and she veils.
That's enough. The Saudi government
does not have to be upset, destabilized, worried, by the judicial
maneuvers targeting its Prime Minister because those who want to
submit it to their wishes have no national grip on its operation.
It is hoped that governments will
reject this new irresponsible delirium.
Marc SALOMONE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire